导管消融腔静脉窦依赖性扑动后右冠状动脉损伤的长期风险。

IF 5.6 2区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Haran Yogasundaram, Muralidhar Reddy Papireddy, Saman Nazarian, Gustavo S Guandalini, Timothy M Markman, Robert D Schaller, Michael P Riley, David Lin, Sanjay Dixit, Benjamin D'Souza, Ramanan Kumareswaran, David J Callans, David S Frankel, Fermin C Garcia, Erica Zado, Rajat Deo, Andrew E Epstein, Gregory E Supple, Francis E Marchlinski, Matthew C Hyman
{"title":"导管消融腔静脉窦依赖性扑动后右冠状动脉损伤的长期风险。","authors":"Haran Yogasundaram, Muralidhar Reddy Papireddy, Saman Nazarian, Gustavo S Guandalini, Timothy M Markman, Robert D Schaller, Michael P Riley, David Lin, Sanjay Dixit, Benjamin D'Souza, Ramanan Kumareswaran, David J Callans, David S Frankel, Fermin C Garcia, Erica Zado, Rajat Deo, Andrew E Epstein, Gregory E Supple, Francis E Marchlinski, Matthew C Hyman","doi":"10.1016/j.hrthm.2024.09.029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of cavotricuspid isthmus (CTI)-dependent atrial flutter requires ablation of the tricuspid annulus overlying the right coronary artery (RCA). While considered safe, reports of acute and subacute RCA injury in human and animal studies raise the possibility of late RCA stenosis.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the incidence and severity of angiographic RCA stenoses in patients who have undergone CTI RFA to a control group to assess the long-term risk of RCA damage.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A two-center retrospective case-cohort study was performed including all patients from 2002-2018 undergoing atrial fibrillation (AF) with CTI ablation (CTI+AF) or AF ablation alone with subsequent coronary angiography (CAG). The AF alone group served as controls due to anticipated similarity of baseline characteristics. Coronary arteries that are anatomically remote to the CTI were examined as prespecified falsification endpoints. CAG was scored by a blinded observer.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>156 patients who underwent PVI with subsequent CAG (CTI+AF, n=81; AF alone, n=75) had no difference in baseline characteristics including age, sex, comorbidities, and medications. Mean time from ablation to CAG was similar (CTI+AF 5.0±3.7 years vs AF alone 5.4 ±3.9 years, p=0.5). The mid and distal RCA showed no difference in the average number of angiographic stenoses or lesion severity. In regression analysis, CTI ablation was not a predictor of RCA stenosis severity (p=0.6). There was no difference in coronary disease at sites remote to the CTI ablation (p=NS for all).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There was no observed relationship between CTI RFA and the number or severity of angiographically apparent RCA stenoses in long-term follow up.</p>","PeriodicalId":12886,"journal":{"name":"Heart rhythm","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Long-term Risk of Right Coronary Artery Injury Following Catheter Ablation of Cavotricuspid Isthmus-dependent Flutter.\",\"authors\":\"Haran Yogasundaram, Muralidhar Reddy Papireddy, Saman Nazarian, Gustavo S Guandalini, Timothy M Markman, Robert D Schaller, Michael P Riley, David Lin, Sanjay Dixit, Benjamin D'Souza, Ramanan Kumareswaran, David J Callans, David S Frankel, Fermin C Garcia, Erica Zado, Rajat Deo, Andrew E Epstein, Gregory E Supple, Francis E Marchlinski, Matthew C Hyman\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.hrthm.2024.09.029\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of cavotricuspid isthmus (CTI)-dependent atrial flutter requires ablation of the tricuspid annulus overlying the right coronary artery (RCA). While considered safe, reports of acute and subacute RCA injury in human and animal studies raise the possibility of late RCA stenosis.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the incidence and severity of angiographic RCA stenoses in patients who have undergone CTI RFA to a control group to assess the long-term risk of RCA damage.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A two-center retrospective case-cohort study was performed including all patients from 2002-2018 undergoing atrial fibrillation (AF) with CTI ablation (CTI+AF) or AF ablation alone with subsequent coronary angiography (CAG). The AF alone group served as controls due to anticipated similarity of baseline characteristics. Coronary arteries that are anatomically remote to the CTI were examined as prespecified falsification endpoints. CAG was scored by a blinded observer.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>156 patients who underwent PVI with subsequent CAG (CTI+AF, n=81; AF alone, n=75) had no difference in baseline characteristics including age, sex, comorbidities, and medications. Mean time from ablation to CAG was similar (CTI+AF 5.0±3.7 years vs AF alone 5.4 ±3.9 years, p=0.5). The mid and distal RCA showed no difference in the average number of angiographic stenoses or lesion severity. In regression analysis, CTI ablation was not a predictor of RCA stenosis severity (p=0.6). There was no difference in coronary disease at sites remote to the CTI ablation (p=NS for all).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There was no observed relationship between CTI RFA and the number or severity of angiographically apparent RCA stenoses in long-term follow up.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12886,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Heart rhythm\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Heart rhythm\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrthm.2024.09.029\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Heart rhythm","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrthm.2024.09.029","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:射频消融(RFA)治疗腔静脉峡(CTI)依赖性心房扑动需要消融覆盖右冠状动脉(RCA)的三尖瓣环。尽管被认为是安全的,但人类和动物研究中关于急性和亚急性 RCA 损伤的报告提出了后期 RCA 狭窄的可能性:目的:比较 CTI RFA 患者与对照组患者血管造影 RCA 狭窄的发生率和严重程度,以评估 RCA 损伤的长期风险:我们进行了一项双中心回顾性病例队列研究,研究对象包括2002-2018年期间接受房颤消融术(CTI+AF)或单纯房颤消融术并随后接受冠状动脉造影术(CAG)的所有患者。由于基线特征相似,单纯房颤组作为对照组。与 CTI 在解剖学上相距较远的冠状动脉作为预设的伪造终点接受检查。CAG由盲人观察员评分:156名接受PVI并随后接受CAG的患者(CTI+房颤,81人;单纯房颤,75人)在年龄、性别、合并症和药物治疗等基线特征方面没有差异。从消融到 CAG 的平均时间相似(CTI+AF 5.0±3.7 年 vs 单纯房颤 5.4±3.9 年,P=0.5)。RCA中段和远段的血管造影狭窄平均数量或病变严重程度没有差异。在回归分析中,CTI消融并不能预测RCA狭窄的严重程度(P=0.6)。CTI消融术远端部位的冠状动脉疾病没有差异(P=NS):结论:在长期随访中,未观察到 CTI RFA 与血管造影显示的 RCA 狭窄数量或严重程度之间的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Long-term Risk of Right Coronary Artery Injury Following Catheter Ablation of Cavotricuspid Isthmus-dependent Flutter.

Background: Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of cavotricuspid isthmus (CTI)-dependent atrial flutter requires ablation of the tricuspid annulus overlying the right coronary artery (RCA). While considered safe, reports of acute and subacute RCA injury in human and animal studies raise the possibility of late RCA stenosis.

Objective: To compare the incidence and severity of angiographic RCA stenoses in patients who have undergone CTI RFA to a control group to assess the long-term risk of RCA damage.

Methods: A two-center retrospective case-cohort study was performed including all patients from 2002-2018 undergoing atrial fibrillation (AF) with CTI ablation (CTI+AF) or AF ablation alone with subsequent coronary angiography (CAG). The AF alone group served as controls due to anticipated similarity of baseline characteristics. Coronary arteries that are anatomically remote to the CTI were examined as prespecified falsification endpoints. CAG was scored by a blinded observer.

Results: 156 patients who underwent PVI with subsequent CAG (CTI+AF, n=81; AF alone, n=75) had no difference in baseline characteristics including age, sex, comorbidities, and medications. Mean time from ablation to CAG was similar (CTI+AF 5.0±3.7 years vs AF alone 5.4 ±3.9 years, p=0.5). The mid and distal RCA showed no difference in the average number of angiographic stenoses or lesion severity. In regression analysis, CTI ablation was not a predictor of RCA stenosis severity (p=0.6). There was no difference in coronary disease at sites remote to the CTI ablation (p=NS for all).

Conclusion: There was no observed relationship between CTI RFA and the number or severity of angiographically apparent RCA stenoses in long-term follow up.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Heart rhythm
Heart rhythm 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
10.50
自引率
5.50%
发文量
1465
审稿时长
24 days
期刊介绍: HeartRhythm, the official Journal of the Heart Rhythm Society and the Cardiac Electrophysiology Society, is a unique journal for fundamental discovery and clinical applicability. HeartRhythm integrates the entire cardiac electrophysiology (EP) community from basic and clinical academic researchers, private practitioners, engineers, allied professionals, industry, and trainees, all of whom are vital and interdependent members of our EP community. The Heart Rhythm Society is the international leader in science, education, and advocacy for cardiac arrhythmia professionals and patients, and the primary information resource on heart rhythm disorders. Its mission is to improve the care of patients by promoting research, education, and optimal health care policies and standards.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信