N T Snigdha, M I Karobari, A Kamarudin, N A Samsudin, F Baharin, N Dziaruddin, A A Assiry, A M Luke, G A Scardina
{"title":"再生牙髓切断术治疗重要原牙的系统性回顾和 Meta 分析。","authors":"N T Snigdha, M I Karobari, A Kamarudin, N A Samsudin, F Baharin, N Dziaruddin, A A Assiry, A M Luke, G A Scardina","doi":"10.23804/ejpd.2024.1981","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To assess the clinical and radiographic success rates of regenerative pulpotomy compared to devitalising or preservative pulpotomy in treating vital pulp exposure in primary teeth.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Comprehensive search with PubMed/MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Google Scholar and Open Grey databases was done and two reviewers extracted the data after assessing the studies for eligibility criteria. The Cochrane Collaboration Tool and Minors Checklist assessed the quality of the selected studies. A meta-analysis was performed using RevMan (P<0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Within the limitations of the study, it can be concluded that MTA seemed to be the better alternative to FC and FS, showing a lower risk of failure and can be recommended for pulpotomy in primary teeth. BD also demonstrated promising results as a pulpotomy medicament.</p>","PeriodicalId":11930,"journal":{"name":"European journal of paediatric dentistry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Regenerative Pulpotomy in the Treatment of Vital Primary Teeth.\",\"authors\":\"N T Snigdha, M I Karobari, A Kamarudin, N A Samsudin, F Baharin, N Dziaruddin, A A Assiry, A M Luke, G A Scardina\",\"doi\":\"10.23804/ejpd.2024.1981\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To assess the clinical and radiographic success rates of regenerative pulpotomy compared to devitalising or preservative pulpotomy in treating vital pulp exposure in primary teeth.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Comprehensive search with PubMed/MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Google Scholar and Open Grey databases was done and two reviewers extracted the data after assessing the studies for eligibility criteria. The Cochrane Collaboration Tool and Minors Checklist assessed the quality of the selected studies. A meta-analysis was performed using RevMan (P<0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Within the limitations of the study, it can be concluded that MTA seemed to be the better alternative to FC and FS, showing a lower risk of failure and can be recommended for pulpotomy in primary teeth. BD also demonstrated promising results as a pulpotomy medicament.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11930,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European journal of paediatric dentistry\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European journal of paediatric dentistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23804/ejpd.2024.1981\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal of paediatric dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23804/ejpd.2024.1981","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的：评估再生牙髓切断术与去活力或防腐牙髓切断术相比，在治疗基牙牙髓暴露方面的临床和放射学成功率：方法：在PubMed/MEDLINE、Cochrane Library、Web of Science、Google Scholar和Open Grey数据库中进行了全面检索，两名审稿人在评估了研究的资格标准后提取了数据。Cochrane 协作工具和未成年人检查表对所选研究的质量进行了评估。使用 RevMan 进行了荟萃分析（PConclusion：在研究的局限性范围内，可以得出结论：MTA 似乎是 FC 和 FS 的更好替代品，显示出较低的失败风险，可推荐用于基牙的牙髓切断术。BD 作为一种牙髓切断药物也显示出了良好的效果。
A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Regenerative Pulpotomy in the Treatment of Vital Primary Teeth.
Aim: To assess the clinical and radiographic success rates of regenerative pulpotomy compared to devitalising or preservative pulpotomy in treating vital pulp exposure in primary teeth.
Methods: Comprehensive search with PubMed/MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Google Scholar and Open Grey databases was done and two reviewers extracted the data after assessing the studies for eligibility criteria. The Cochrane Collaboration Tool and Minors Checklist assessed the quality of the selected studies. A meta-analysis was performed using RevMan (P<0.05).
Conclusion: Within the limitations of the study, it can be concluded that MTA seemed to be the better alternative to FC and FS, showing a lower risk of failure and can be recommended for pulpotomy in primary teeth. BD also demonstrated promising results as a pulpotomy medicament.
期刊介绍：
The aim and scope of the European Journal of Paediatric Dentistry is to promote research in all aspects of dentistry related to children, including interceptive orthodontics and studies on children and young adults with special needs.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
