Jia Jia Teo, Razan Nossier, Angad Chauhan, Tuan Zea Tan, Vincent Diong Weng Nga
{"title":"AB050.黑色素瘤相关脑膜转移瘤的新疗法与标准疗法：系统综述与网络荟萃分析。","authors":"Jia Jia Teo, Razan Nossier, Angad Chauhan, Tuan Zea Tan, Vincent Diong Weng Nga","doi":"10.21037/cco-24-ab050","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Melanoma stands as a prevalent instigator of leptomeningeal disease (LMD) within the realm of cancer. Given the poor prognosis accompanying this condition, ongoing trials explore a spectrum of treatment modalities in pursuit of more effective interventions. To ascertain the most effective therapeutic strategies, we aim to compare novel treatments against the current standard of care for melanoma-associated LMD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive search was conducted across multiple databases, including PubMed/Medline, EMBASE, Scopus, ScienceDirect and Web of Science for relevant studies published from January 2014 to January 2024. We included primary research studies, including observational studies, randomised control trials, quasi-experimental design studies, clinical trials, and experimental studies focusing on LMD caused by metastatic melanoma. Data extraction was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines and quality assessment/risk of bias is performed individually using the GRADE method. A network meta-analysis is conducted to evaluate the effects of multiple interventions within the study. Overall survival outcomes were quantified using log hazard ratio.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 680 records screened for eligibility, seven carefully chosen studies, meeting our specific inclusion criteria, provide insights into the management of 397 patients grappling with LMD due to metastatic melanoma. These studies vary in design: one observational cohort study with 29 participants, a clinical trial with 25 patients, four retrospective cohort studies ranging from 39 to 190 participants and one experimental study with 24 patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite the escalating breakthroughs of treatment options in melanoma-associated LMD, further studies may be imperative to conclusively determine whether the newer therapeutic options yield superior outcomes compared to the current standard of care treatments.</p>","PeriodicalId":9945,"journal":{"name":"Chinese clinical oncology","volume":"13 Suppl 1","pages":"AB050"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"AB050. Novel treatment vs. standard of care in melanoma-associated leptomeningeal metastases: a systematic review & network meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Jia Jia Teo, Razan Nossier, Angad Chauhan, Tuan Zea Tan, Vincent Diong Weng Nga\",\"doi\":\"10.21037/cco-24-ab050\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Melanoma stands as a prevalent instigator of leptomeningeal disease (LMD) within the realm of cancer. Given the poor prognosis accompanying this condition, ongoing trials explore a spectrum of treatment modalities in pursuit of more effective interventions. To ascertain the most effective therapeutic strategies, we aim to compare novel treatments against the current standard of care for melanoma-associated LMD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive search was conducted across multiple databases, including PubMed/Medline, EMBASE, Scopus, ScienceDirect and Web of Science for relevant studies published from January 2014 to January 2024. We included primary research studies, including observational studies, randomised control trials, quasi-experimental design studies, clinical trials, and experimental studies focusing on LMD caused by metastatic melanoma. Data extraction was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines and quality assessment/risk of bias is performed individually using the GRADE method. A network meta-analysis is conducted to evaluate the effects of multiple interventions within the study. Overall survival outcomes were quantified using log hazard ratio.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 680 records screened for eligibility, seven carefully chosen studies, meeting our specific inclusion criteria, provide insights into the management of 397 patients grappling with LMD due to metastatic melanoma. These studies vary in design: one observational cohort study with 29 participants, a clinical trial with 25 patients, four retrospective cohort studies ranging from 39 to 190 participants and one experimental study with 24 patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite the escalating breakthroughs of treatment options in melanoma-associated LMD, further studies may be imperative to conclusively determine whether the newer therapeutic options yield superior outcomes compared to the current standard of care treatments.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9945,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Chinese clinical oncology\",\"volume\":\"13 Suppl 1\",\"pages\":\"AB050\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Chinese clinical oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21037/cco-24-ab050\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chinese clinical oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/cco-24-ab050","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
AB050. Novel treatment vs. standard of care in melanoma-associated leptomeningeal metastases: a systematic review & network meta-analysis.
Background: Melanoma stands as a prevalent instigator of leptomeningeal disease (LMD) within the realm of cancer. Given the poor prognosis accompanying this condition, ongoing trials explore a spectrum of treatment modalities in pursuit of more effective interventions. To ascertain the most effective therapeutic strategies, we aim to compare novel treatments against the current standard of care for melanoma-associated LMD.
Methods: A comprehensive search was conducted across multiple databases, including PubMed/Medline, EMBASE, Scopus, ScienceDirect and Web of Science for relevant studies published from January 2014 to January 2024. We included primary research studies, including observational studies, randomised control trials, quasi-experimental design studies, clinical trials, and experimental studies focusing on LMD caused by metastatic melanoma. Data extraction was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines and quality assessment/risk of bias is performed individually using the GRADE method. A network meta-analysis is conducted to evaluate the effects of multiple interventions within the study. Overall survival outcomes were quantified using log hazard ratio.
Results: Out of 680 records screened for eligibility, seven carefully chosen studies, meeting our specific inclusion criteria, provide insights into the management of 397 patients grappling with LMD due to metastatic melanoma. These studies vary in design: one observational cohort study with 29 participants, a clinical trial with 25 patients, four retrospective cohort studies ranging from 39 to 190 participants and one experimental study with 24 patients.
Conclusions: Despite the escalating breakthroughs of treatment options in melanoma-associated LMD, further studies may be imperative to conclusively determine whether the newer therapeutic options yield superior outcomes compared to the current standard of care treatments.
期刊介绍：
The Chinese Clinical Oncology (Print ISSN 2304-3865; Online ISSN 2304-3873; Chin Clin Oncol; CCO) publishes articles that describe new findings in the field of oncology, and provides current and practical information on diagnosis, prevention and clinical investigations of cancer. Specific areas of interest include, but are not limited to: multimodality therapy, biomarkers, imaging, tumor biology, pathology, chemoprevention, and technical advances related to cancer. The aim of the Journal is to provide a forum for the dissemination of original research articles as well as review articles in all areas related to cancer. It is an international, peer-reviewed journal with a focus on cutting-edge findings in this rapidly changing field. To that end, Chin Clin Oncol is dedicated to translating the latest research developments into best multimodality practice. The journal features a distinguished editorial board, which brings together a team of highly experienced specialists in cancer treatment and research. The diverse experience of the board members allows our editorial panel to lend their expertise to a broad spectrum of cancer subjects.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
