老年人焦虑、抑郁与认知功能之间的关系:对 1936 年洛锡安出生队列第 1 波数据的探索性横断面分析

IF 3.6 3区 医学 Q2 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Jennifer Sweetman, Lucy E. Stirland, Mona Kanaan, Janie Corley, Paul Redmond, Ian J. Deary, Simon R. Cox, Tom C. Russ, Christina van der Feltz-Cornelis
{"title":"老年人焦虑、抑郁与认知功能之间的关系:对 1936 年洛锡安出生队列第 1 波数据的探索性横断面分析","authors":"Jennifer Sweetman,&nbsp;Lucy E. Stirland,&nbsp;Mona Kanaan,&nbsp;Janie Corley,&nbsp;Paul Redmond,&nbsp;Ian J. Deary,&nbsp;Simon R. Cox,&nbsp;Tom C. Russ,&nbsp;Christina van der Feltz-Cornelis","doi":"10.1002/gps.6151","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>To explore the strength of the association between cognitive functioning and depression and anxiety in older people without dementia.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>An exploratory, cross-sectional analysis of Wave 1 (2004–2007) data from the Lothian Birth Cohort 1936 dataset. Three subgroups were based on Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) subscales: no probable anxiety or depression (<i>N</i> = 592), probable anxiety no depression (<i>N</i> = 122), probable depression with/without anxiety (depression) (<i>N</i> = 30). Regression analyses determined relationships between subgroups and identified cognitive test variables.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Participants were 744 individuals (male = 385 [51.5%]; mean [M] age = 69.5 years [Standard deviation = 0.83]); characteristics for subgroups were similar. Participants with probable depression had slower simple reaction time scores than those with no anxiety or depression (regression slope [<i>β</i>] on the log10 scale = 0.05, 95% Confidence Interval [0.03, 0.08], <i>p</i> ≤ 0.001). Those with probable anxiety had significantly worse scores on other tests: Spatial span (<i>β</i> = −0.80 [−1.36, −0.25], <i>p</i> ≤ 0.005), Symbol Search (<i>β</i> = −1.67 [−2.90, −0.45], <i>p</i> ≤ 0.01), Matrix Reasoning (<i>β</i> = −1.58 [−2.55, −0.60], <i>p</i> ≤ 0.005) and Block Design (<i>β</i> = −3.33 [−5.29, −1.37], <i>p</i> ≤ 0.001), than those without probable anxiety or depression.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Probable depression and anxiety were found to be associated with lower cognitive function in those without evidence of dementia. People with probable anxiety showed poorer performance in tests that concerned making decisions. People with probable depression showed slower processing speed.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":14060,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry","volume":"39 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/gps.6151","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Relationship Between Anxiety, Depression and Cognitive Functioning in Older Adults: An Exploratory Cross-Sectional Analysis of Wave 1 Lothian Birth Cohort 1936 Data\",\"authors\":\"Jennifer Sweetman,&nbsp;Lucy E. Stirland,&nbsp;Mona Kanaan,&nbsp;Janie Corley,&nbsp;Paul Redmond,&nbsp;Ian J. Deary,&nbsp;Simon R. Cox,&nbsp;Tom C. Russ,&nbsp;Christina van der Feltz-Cornelis\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/gps.6151\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objectives</h3>\\n \\n <p>To explore the strength of the association between cognitive functioning and depression and anxiety in older people without dementia.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>An exploratory, cross-sectional analysis of Wave 1 (2004–2007) data from the Lothian Birth Cohort 1936 dataset. Three subgroups were based on Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) subscales: no probable anxiety or depression (<i>N</i> = 592), probable anxiety no depression (<i>N</i> = 122), probable depression with/without anxiety (depression) (<i>N</i> = 30). Regression analyses determined relationships between subgroups and identified cognitive test variables.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Participants were 744 individuals (male = 385 [51.5%]; mean [M] age = 69.5 years [Standard deviation = 0.83]); characteristics for subgroups were similar. Participants with probable depression had slower simple reaction time scores than those with no anxiety or depression (regression slope [<i>β</i>] on the log10 scale = 0.05, 95% Confidence Interval [0.03, 0.08], <i>p</i> ≤ 0.001). Those with probable anxiety had significantly worse scores on other tests: Spatial span (<i>β</i> = −0.80 [−1.36, −0.25], <i>p</i> ≤ 0.005), Symbol Search (<i>β</i> = −1.67 [−2.90, −0.45], <i>p</i> ≤ 0.01), Matrix Reasoning (<i>β</i> = −1.58 [−2.55, −0.60], <i>p</i> ≤ 0.005) and Block Design (<i>β</i> = −3.33 [−5.29, −1.37], <i>p</i> ≤ 0.001), than those without probable anxiety or depression.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>Probable depression and anxiety were found to be associated with lower cognitive function in those without evidence of dementia. People with probable anxiety showed poorer performance in tests that concerned making decisions. People with probable depression showed slower processing speed.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14060,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry\",\"volume\":\"39 9\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/gps.6151\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/gps.6151\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/gps.6151","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的 探讨无痴呆症老年人的认知功能与抑郁和焦虑之间的关联强度。 方法 对来自 1936 年洛锡安出生队列数据集的第 1 波(2004-2007 年)数据进行探索性横截面分析。根据医院焦虑和抑郁量表(HADS)的分量表划分出三个亚组:无可能焦虑或抑郁(592 人)、可能焦虑无抑郁(122 人)、可能抑郁伴/不伴焦虑(抑郁)(30 人)。回归分析确定了亚组与已确定的认知测试变量之间的关系。 结果 744 名参与者(男性 = 385 [51.5%];平均 [M] 年龄 = 69.5 岁 [标准差 = 0.83]);各亚组的特征相似。与没有焦虑或抑郁的参与者相比,可能患有抑郁症的参与者的简单反应时间得分较慢(log10标度的回归斜率[β]=0.05,95%置信区间[0.03,0.08],p≤0.001)。可能患有焦虑症的儿童在其他测试中的得分明显较低:空间跨度(β = -0.80 [-1.36, -0.25],p ≤ 0.005)、符号搜索(β = -1.67 [-2.90, -0.45],p ≤ 0.01)、矩阵推理(β = -1.58 [-2.55, -0.60],p ≤ 0.005)和积木设计(β = -3.33 [-5.29, -1.37],p ≤ 0.001)的得分明显低于无焦虑或抑郁倾向者。 结论 在没有痴呆症证据的人群中,可能的抑郁和焦虑与认知功能低下有关。疑似焦虑症患者在有关决策的测试中表现较差。疑似抑郁症患者的处理速度较慢。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

The Relationship Between Anxiety, Depression and Cognitive Functioning in Older Adults: An Exploratory Cross-Sectional Analysis of Wave 1 Lothian Birth Cohort 1936 Data

The Relationship Between Anxiety, Depression and Cognitive Functioning in Older Adults: An Exploratory Cross-Sectional Analysis of Wave 1 Lothian Birth Cohort 1936 Data

Objectives

To explore the strength of the association between cognitive functioning and depression and anxiety in older people without dementia.

Methods

An exploratory, cross-sectional analysis of Wave 1 (2004–2007) data from the Lothian Birth Cohort 1936 dataset. Three subgroups were based on Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) subscales: no probable anxiety or depression (N = 592), probable anxiety no depression (N = 122), probable depression with/without anxiety (depression) (N = 30). Regression analyses determined relationships between subgroups and identified cognitive test variables.

Results

Participants were 744 individuals (male = 385 [51.5%]; mean [M] age = 69.5 years [Standard deviation = 0.83]); characteristics for subgroups were similar. Participants with probable depression had slower simple reaction time scores than those with no anxiety or depression (regression slope [β] on the log10 scale = 0.05, 95% Confidence Interval [0.03, 0.08], p ≤ 0.001). Those with probable anxiety had significantly worse scores on other tests: Spatial span (β = −0.80 [−1.36, −0.25], p ≤ 0.005), Symbol Search (β = −1.67 [−2.90, −0.45], p ≤ 0.01), Matrix Reasoning (β = −1.58 [−2.55, −0.60], p ≤ 0.005) and Block Design (β = −3.33 [−5.29, −1.37], p ≤ 0.001), than those without probable anxiety or depression.

Conclusion

Probable depression and anxiety were found to be associated with lower cognitive function in those without evidence of dementia. People with probable anxiety showed poorer performance in tests that concerned making decisions. People with probable depression showed slower processing speed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
2.50%
发文量
168
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The rapidly increasing world population of aged people has led to a growing need to focus attention on the problems of mental disorder in late life. The aim of the Journal is to communicate the results of original research in the causes, treatment and care of all forms of mental disorder which affect the elderly. The Journal is of interest to psychiatrists, psychologists, social scientists, nurses and others engaged in therapeutic professions, together with general neurobiological researchers. The Journal provides an international perspective on the important issue of geriatric psychiatry, and contributions are published from countries throughout the world. Topics covered include epidemiology of mental disorders in old age, clinical aetiological research, post-mortem pathological and neurochemical studies, treatment trials and evaluation of geriatric psychiatry services.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信