在全髋关节置换术中使用自动撞击装置降低小腿骨折风险

IF 1.5 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Dan Gordon , Justin M. Cardenas , David Fawley , Kurt J. Kitziger , Brian P. Gladnick
{"title":"在全髋关节置换术中使用自动撞击装置降低小腿骨折风险","authors":"Dan Gordon ,&nbsp;Justin M. Cardenas ,&nbsp;David Fawley ,&nbsp;Kurt J. Kitziger ,&nbsp;Brian P. Gladnick","doi":"10.1016/j.jor.2024.08.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Automated broaching has recently been introduced for total hip arthroplasty (THA), with the goal of improving surgical efficiency and reducing surgeon workload. While studies have suggested that this technique may improve femoral sizing and alignment, little has been published regarding its safety, particularly with regard to calcar fractures. The purpose of our study was to evaluate the risk of calcar fracture during automated broaching, and to determine if this risk can be mitigated.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We queried our prospective institutional database and identified 1596 unilateral THAs performed by the senior author using automated impaction between 2019 and 2023. We identified the incidence of calcar fracture with automated impaction, and whether the fracture occurred during broaching or stem insertion. We additionally determined calcar fracture incidence within two consecutive subgroups of patients using different stem insertion techniques; subgroup (1): automated broaching with automated stem insertion for all patients; versus subgroup (2): automated broaching with automated stem insertion ONLY if a cushion of cancellous bone separated the broach from the calcar, otherwise the stem was placed manually. Continuous and categorical variables were analyzed with Student's t-test and Fisher's exact test, respectively.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Seventeen calcar fractures occurred intraoperatively (1.1 %). Only two fractures occurred during automated broaching (0.1 %), while fifteen occurred during final stem impaction (0.9 %) (p = 0.007). Four calcar fractures (1.4 %) occurred in subgroup 1, compared to two in subgroup 2 (0.6 %) (p = 0.28).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Our study found a calcar fracture incidence of 1.1 % using automated impaction, consistent with historically reported rates of 0.4–3.7 %. We found that calcar fractures are more likely to occur during stem insertion than during femoral broaching. We recommend that if any part of the final broach is in direct contact with the calcar, the final stem should be impacted manually to minimize fracture risk.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":16633,"journal":{"name":"Journal of orthopaedics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0972978X24002903/pdfft?md5=e35f0247e7cdda1e88b8bbf65030d0e6&pid=1-s2.0-S0972978X24002903-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mitigating calcar fracture risk with automated impaction during total hip arthroplasty\",\"authors\":\"Dan Gordon ,&nbsp;Justin M. Cardenas ,&nbsp;David Fawley ,&nbsp;Kurt J. Kitziger ,&nbsp;Brian P. Gladnick\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jor.2024.08.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Automated broaching has recently been introduced for total hip arthroplasty (THA), with the goal of improving surgical efficiency and reducing surgeon workload. While studies have suggested that this technique may improve femoral sizing and alignment, little has been published regarding its safety, particularly with regard to calcar fractures. The purpose of our study was to evaluate the risk of calcar fracture during automated broaching, and to determine if this risk can be mitigated.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We queried our prospective institutional database and identified 1596 unilateral THAs performed by the senior author using automated impaction between 2019 and 2023. We identified the incidence of calcar fracture with automated impaction, and whether the fracture occurred during broaching or stem insertion. We additionally determined calcar fracture incidence within two consecutive subgroups of patients using different stem insertion techniques; subgroup (1): automated broaching with automated stem insertion for all patients; versus subgroup (2): automated broaching with automated stem insertion ONLY if a cushion of cancellous bone separated the broach from the calcar, otherwise the stem was placed manually. Continuous and categorical variables were analyzed with Student's t-test and Fisher's exact test, respectively.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Seventeen calcar fractures occurred intraoperatively (1.1 %). Only two fractures occurred during automated broaching (0.1 %), while fifteen occurred during final stem impaction (0.9 %) (p = 0.007). Four calcar fractures (1.4 %) occurred in subgroup 1, compared to two in subgroup 2 (0.6 %) (p = 0.28).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Our study found a calcar fracture incidence of 1.1 % using automated impaction, consistent with historically reported rates of 0.4–3.7 %. We found that calcar fractures are more likely to occur during stem insertion than during femoral broaching. We recommend that if any part of the final broach is in direct contact with the calcar, the final stem should be impacted manually to minimize fracture risk.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16633,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of orthopaedics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0972978X24002903/pdfft?md5=e35f0247e7cdda1e88b8bbf65030d0e6&pid=1-s2.0-S0972978X24002903-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of orthopaedics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0972978X24002903\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of orthopaedics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0972978X24002903","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景最近,全髋关节置换术(THA)引入了自动拉床,目的是提高手术效率和减少外科医生的工作量。虽然有研究表明该技术可改善股骨大小和对位,但有关其安全性,尤其是有关髋臼骨折方面的研究却少之又少。我们的研究旨在评估自动拉床过程中发生钙骨骨折的风险,并确定是否可以降低这种风险。方法我们查询了我们的前瞻性机构数据库,并确定了资深作者在 2019 年至 2023 年期间使用自动撞击术进行的 1596 例单侧 THAs。我们确定了自动撞击术的钙痂骨折发生率,以及骨折是发生在拉床还是柄插入过程中。此外,我们还确定了使用不同骨干插入技术的两个连续亚组患者的钙骺端骨折发生率;亚组(1):所有患者均采用自动拉床和自动骨干插入技术;亚组(2):仅在松质骨垫将拉床与钙骺端隔开的情况下采用自动拉床和自动骨干插入技术,否则采用手动放置骨干。连续变量和分类变量分别采用学生 t 检验和费雪精确检验进行分析。只有两例骨折发生在自动拉刀过程中(0.1%),而15例发生在最终柄植入过程中(0.9%)(P = 0.007)。结论我们的研究发现,使用自动撞击法的钙砧骨折发生率为1.1%,与历史上报告的0.4-3.7%的发生率一致。我们发现,与股骨拉床相比,骨干插入过程中更容易发生钙骺端骨折。我们建议,如果最终拉刀的任何部分直接接触到小腿,则应手动撞击最终柄,以将骨折风险降至最低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Mitigating calcar fracture risk with automated impaction during total hip arthroplasty

Background

Automated broaching has recently been introduced for total hip arthroplasty (THA), with the goal of improving surgical efficiency and reducing surgeon workload. While studies have suggested that this technique may improve femoral sizing and alignment, little has been published regarding its safety, particularly with regard to calcar fractures. The purpose of our study was to evaluate the risk of calcar fracture during automated broaching, and to determine if this risk can be mitigated.

Methods

We queried our prospective institutional database and identified 1596 unilateral THAs performed by the senior author using automated impaction between 2019 and 2023. We identified the incidence of calcar fracture with automated impaction, and whether the fracture occurred during broaching or stem insertion. We additionally determined calcar fracture incidence within two consecutive subgroups of patients using different stem insertion techniques; subgroup (1): automated broaching with automated stem insertion for all patients; versus subgroup (2): automated broaching with automated stem insertion ONLY if a cushion of cancellous bone separated the broach from the calcar, otherwise the stem was placed manually. Continuous and categorical variables were analyzed with Student's t-test and Fisher's exact test, respectively.

Results

Seventeen calcar fractures occurred intraoperatively (1.1 %). Only two fractures occurred during automated broaching (0.1 %), while fifteen occurred during final stem impaction (0.9 %) (p = 0.007). Four calcar fractures (1.4 %) occurred in subgroup 1, compared to two in subgroup 2 (0.6 %) (p = 0.28).

Conclusions

Our study found a calcar fracture incidence of 1.1 % using automated impaction, consistent with historically reported rates of 0.4–3.7 %. We found that calcar fractures are more likely to occur during stem insertion than during femoral broaching. We recommend that if any part of the final broach is in direct contact with the calcar, the final stem should be impacted manually to minimize fracture risk.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
6.70%
发文量
202
审稿时长
56 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Orthopaedics aims to be a leading journal in orthopaedics and contribute towards the improvement of quality of orthopedic health care. The journal publishes original research work and review articles related to different aspects of orthopaedics including Arthroplasty, Arthroscopy, Sports Medicine, Trauma, Spine and Spinal deformities, Pediatric orthopaedics, limb reconstruction procedures, hand surgery, and orthopaedic oncology. It also publishes articles on continuing education, health-related information, case reports and letters to the editor. It is requested to note that the journal has an international readership and all submissions should be aimed at specifying something about the setting in which the work was conducted. Authors must also provide any specific reasons for the research and also provide an elaborate description of the results.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信