基于无人机图像和机器学习算法的西南地区滴灌柑橘园土壤含水量估算

IF 5.9 1区 农林科学 Q1 AGRONOMY
Quanshan Liu , Zongjun Wu , Ningbo Cui , Shunsheng Zheng , Shidan Zhu , Shouzheng Jiang , Zhihui Wang , Daozhi Gong , Yaosheng Wang , Lu Zhao
{"title":"基于无人机图像和机器学习算法的西南地区滴灌柑橘园土壤含水量估算","authors":"Quanshan Liu ,&nbsp;Zongjun Wu ,&nbsp;Ningbo Cui ,&nbsp;Shunsheng Zheng ,&nbsp;Shidan Zhu ,&nbsp;Shouzheng Jiang ,&nbsp;Zhihui Wang ,&nbsp;Daozhi Gong ,&nbsp;Yaosheng Wang ,&nbsp;Lu Zhao","doi":"10.1016/j.agwat.2024.109069","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Soil moisture content (SMC), as a pivotal component in the energy and matter exchange processes within the soil-plant-atmosphere continuum, plays a crucial role in surface water dynamics, energy fluxes, and carbon cycling within ecosystems. The development of remote sensing technology has offered new perspectives for monitoring soil moisture at regional scales. Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAV) equip with multispectral have distinct advantages for vegetation monitoring, including rapidity and cost-effectiveness, which has superior applicability and practicality. Therefore, in a 5a \"Daya\" late-maturing citrus orchard, the vegetation index (VI) and texture feature (TF) information of citrus canopy based on UAV multi-spectral images were extracted, and soil and plant analyzer development (SPAD) of citrus was collected. These different data sources were integrated into the framework of the random forest algorithm (RF) and genetic algorithm-optimized random forest (GA-RF) to evaluate the accuracy of surface SMC (SSMC) estimation in citrus orchard. The Biswas model was utilized to simulate the root zone SMC (RSMC). The spatiotemporal variations of SMC in citrus orchard were analyzed, and the potential of low-cost sensor-equipped drones in rapidly acquiring spatial and temporal distribution information of SMC at a large regional scale was explored. The results indicated that the GA-RF models outperformed the RF models in estimating citrus orchard SMC (with R<sup>2</sup> ranging from 0.502 to 0.949 and RMSE ranging from 0.552 % to 3.166 % for GA-RF, compared to R<sup>2</sup> ranging from 0.430 to 0.936 and RMSE ranging from 0.587 % to 3.449 % for the RF). The GA-RF models using VI+SPAD as inputs exhibited the best performance for SMC at depths of 5 cm, 10 cm, 20 cm and 40 cm (SMC5, SMC10, SMC20 and SMC40) across citrus growth stages (R<sup>2</sup> ranging from 0.793 to 0.949 at 5 cm, R<sup>2</sup> ranging from 0.702 to 0.938 at 10 cm, R<sup>2</sup> ranging from 0.714 to 0.927 at 20 cm). In bud bust to flowering, young fruit and fruit maturation stages (stage Ⅰ, ⅠⅠ and ⅠⅤ), all models demonstrated good accuracy in estimating SMC at depth of 10 cm (R<sup>2</sup> ranging from 0.567 to 0.908 in stage Ⅰ, with R<sup>2</sup> ranging from 0.681 to 0.916 in stage ⅠⅠ and R<sup>2</sup> ranging from 0.579 to 0.938 in stage ⅠⅤ). In fruit expansion stage (stage III), the models performed best in predicting SMC5 (R<sup>2</sup> ranging from 0.698 to 0.861). The Biswas model was constructed to simulate SMC40 by utilizing the inverted SMC10 and SMC20, thereby generating spatiotemporal distribution maps of SMC at different depths in citrus orchard. The SSMC was susceptible to environmental factors, exhibiting significant spatiotemporal heterogeneity. In summary, this study illustrated that the integration of multiple data sources into GA-RF enhanced the estimation performance of SMC at different growth stages of late-maturing citrus orchard in the Southwest China. Additionally, it enabled the rapid and efficient monitoring of spatiotemporal variations in SMC, providing an effective method and practical foundation for precision irrigation and improved water use efficiency.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7634,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural Water Management","volume":"303 ","pages":"Article 109069"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378377424004050/pdfft?md5=db2c2299e15804c87635309e6c534499&pid=1-s2.0-S0378377424004050-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Soil moisture content estimation of drip-irrigated citrus orchard based on UAV images and machine learning algorithm in Southwest China\",\"authors\":\"Quanshan Liu ,&nbsp;Zongjun Wu ,&nbsp;Ningbo Cui ,&nbsp;Shunsheng Zheng ,&nbsp;Shidan Zhu ,&nbsp;Shouzheng Jiang ,&nbsp;Zhihui Wang ,&nbsp;Daozhi Gong ,&nbsp;Yaosheng Wang ,&nbsp;Lu Zhao\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.agwat.2024.109069\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Soil moisture content (SMC), as a pivotal component in the energy and matter exchange processes within the soil-plant-atmosphere continuum, plays a crucial role in surface water dynamics, energy fluxes, and carbon cycling within ecosystems. The development of remote sensing technology has offered new perspectives for monitoring soil moisture at regional scales. Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAV) equip with multispectral have distinct advantages for vegetation monitoring, including rapidity and cost-effectiveness, which has superior applicability and practicality. Therefore, in a 5a \\\"Daya\\\" late-maturing citrus orchard, the vegetation index (VI) and texture feature (TF) information of citrus canopy based on UAV multi-spectral images were extracted, and soil and plant analyzer development (SPAD) of citrus was collected. These different data sources were integrated into the framework of the random forest algorithm (RF) and genetic algorithm-optimized random forest (GA-RF) to evaluate the accuracy of surface SMC (SSMC) estimation in citrus orchard. The Biswas model was utilized to simulate the root zone SMC (RSMC). The spatiotemporal variations of SMC in citrus orchard were analyzed, and the potential of low-cost sensor-equipped drones in rapidly acquiring spatial and temporal distribution information of SMC at a large regional scale was explored. The results indicated that the GA-RF models outperformed the RF models in estimating citrus orchard SMC (with R<sup>2</sup> ranging from 0.502 to 0.949 and RMSE ranging from 0.552 % to 3.166 % for GA-RF, compared to R<sup>2</sup> ranging from 0.430 to 0.936 and RMSE ranging from 0.587 % to 3.449 % for the RF). The GA-RF models using VI+SPAD as inputs exhibited the best performance for SMC at depths of 5 cm, 10 cm, 20 cm and 40 cm (SMC5, SMC10, SMC20 and SMC40) across citrus growth stages (R<sup>2</sup> ranging from 0.793 to 0.949 at 5 cm, R<sup>2</sup> ranging from 0.702 to 0.938 at 10 cm, R<sup>2</sup> ranging from 0.714 to 0.927 at 20 cm). In bud bust to flowering, young fruit and fruit maturation stages (stage Ⅰ, ⅠⅠ and ⅠⅤ), all models demonstrated good accuracy in estimating SMC at depth of 10 cm (R<sup>2</sup> ranging from 0.567 to 0.908 in stage Ⅰ, with R<sup>2</sup> ranging from 0.681 to 0.916 in stage ⅠⅠ and R<sup>2</sup> ranging from 0.579 to 0.938 in stage ⅠⅤ). In fruit expansion stage (stage III), the models performed best in predicting SMC5 (R<sup>2</sup> ranging from 0.698 to 0.861). The Biswas model was constructed to simulate SMC40 by utilizing the inverted SMC10 and SMC20, thereby generating spatiotemporal distribution maps of SMC at different depths in citrus orchard. The SSMC was susceptible to environmental factors, exhibiting significant spatiotemporal heterogeneity. In summary, this study illustrated that the integration of multiple data sources into GA-RF enhanced the estimation performance of SMC at different growth stages of late-maturing citrus orchard in the Southwest China. Additionally, it enabled the rapid and efficient monitoring of spatiotemporal variations in SMC, providing an effective method and practical foundation for precision irrigation and improved water use efficiency.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7634,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Agricultural Water Management\",\"volume\":\"303 \",\"pages\":\"Article 109069\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378377424004050/pdfft?md5=db2c2299e15804c87635309e6c534499&pid=1-s2.0-S0378377424004050-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Agricultural Water Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378377424004050\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRONOMY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agricultural Water Management","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378377424004050","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

土壤水分含量(SMC)是土壤-植物-大气连续体中能量和物质交换过程的关键组成部分,在地表水动力学、能量通量和生态系统中的碳循环中发挥着至关重要的作用。遥感技术的发展为在区域范围内监测土壤水分提供了新的视角。配备多光谱设备的无人飞行器(UAV)在植被监测方面具有明显的优势,包括快速性和成本效益,具有更强的适用性和实用性。因此,在一个 5a "大雅 "晚熟柑橘园中,基于无人机多光谱图像提取了柑橘树冠的植被指数(VI)和纹理特征(TF)信息,并收集了柑橘的土壤和植物分析器发育(SPAD)信息。将这些不同的数据源整合到随机森林算法(RF)和遗传算法优化随机森林(GA-RF)的框架中,以评估柑橘果园表面 SMC(SSMC)估算的准确性。Biswas 模型用于模拟根区 SMC(RSMC)。分析了柑橘园中 SMC 的时空变化,并探讨了配备传感器的低成本无人机在大区域范围内快速获取 SMC 时空分布信息的潜力。结果表明,GA-RF 模型在估计柑橘果园 SMC 方面优于 RF 模型(GA-RF 的 R2 为 0.502 至 0.949,RMSE 为 0.552 % 至 3.166 %,而 RF 的 R2 为 0.430 至 0.936,RMSE 为 0.587 % 至 3.449 %)。使用 VI+SPAD 作为输入的 GA-RF 模型在柑橘各生长阶段的 5 厘米、10 厘米、20 厘米和 40 厘米深度(SMC5、SMC10、SMC20 和 SMC40)的 SMC 方面表现最佳(5 厘米深度的 R2 为 0.793 到 0.949,10 厘米深度的 R2 为 0.702 到 0.938,20 厘米深度的 R2 为 0.714 到 0.927)。在花芽分化期、幼果期和果实成熟期(Ⅰ、ⅠⅠ和ⅠⅤ期),所有模型在估计 10 厘米深度的 SMC 时都表现出良好的准确性(在 5 厘米深度 R2 为 0.567 至 0.908)。Ⅰ期的 R2 为 0.681 至 0.916,ⅠⅤ期的 R2 为 0.579 至 0.938)。在果实膨大期(Ⅲ期),模型在预测 SMC5 方面表现最佳(R2 为 0.698 至 0.861)。Biswas 模型利用倒置的 SMC10 和 SMC20 来模拟 SMC40,从而生成柑橘园不同深度的 SMC 时空分布图。SSMC 易受环境因素影响,表现出明显的时空异质性。总之,本研究表明,将多种数据源集成到 GA-RF 中可提高对中国西南地区晚熟柑橘果园不同生长阶段 SMC 的估计性能。此外,它还实现了对 SMC 时空变化的快速高效监测,为精准灌溉和提高用水效率提供了有效方法和实用基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Soil moisture content estimation of drip-irrigated citrus orchard based on UAV images and machine learning algorithm in Southwest China

Soil moisture content (SMC), as a pivotal component in the energy and matter exchange processes within the soil-plant-atmosphere continuum, plays a crucial role in surface water dynamics, energy fluxes, and carbon cycling within ecosystems. The development of remote sensing technology has offered new perspectives for monitoring soil moisture at regional scales. Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAV) equip with multispectral have distinct advantages for vegetation monitoring, including rapidity and cost-effectiveness, which has superior applicability and practicality. Therefore, in a 5a "Daya" late-maturing citrus orchard, the vegetation index (VI) and texture feature (TF) information of citrus canopy based on UAV multi-spectral images were extracted, and soil and plant analyzer development (SPAD) of citrus was collected. These different data sources were integrated into the framework of the random forest algorithm (RF) and genetic algorithm-optimized random forest (GA-RF) to evaluate the accuracy of surface SMC (SSMC) estimation in citrus orchard. The Biswas model was utilized to simulate the root zone SMC (RSMC). The spatiotemporal variations of SMC in citrus orchard were analyzed, and the potential of low-cost sensor-equipped drones in rapidly acquiring spatial and temporal distribution information of SMC at a large regional scale was explored. The results indicated that the GA-RF models outperformed the RF models in estimating citrus orchard SMC (with R2 ranging from 0.502 to 0.949 and RMSE ranging from 0.552 % to 3.166 % for GA-RF, compared to R2 ranging from 0.430 to 0.936 and RMSE ranging from 0.587 % to 3.449 % for the RF). The GA-RF models using VI+SPAD as inputs exhibited the best performance for SMC at depths of 5 cm, 10 cm, 20 cm and 40 cm (SMC5, SMC10, SMC20 and SMC40) across citrus growth stages (R2 ranging from 0.793 to 0.949 at 5 cm, R2 ranging from 0.702 to 0.938 at 10 cm, R2 ranging from 0.714 to 0.927 at 20 cm). In bud bust to flowering, young fruit and fruit maturation stages (stage Ⅰ, ⅠⅠ and ⅠⅤ), all models demonstrated good accuracy in estimating SMC at depth of 10 cm (R2 ranging from 0.567 to 0.908 in stage Ⅰ, with R2 ranging from 0.681 to 0.916 in stage ⅠⅠ and R2 ranging from 0.579 to 0.938 in stage ⅠⅤ). In fruit expansion stage (stage III), the models performed best in predicting SMC5 (R2 ranging from 0.698 to 0.861). The Biswas model was constructed to simulate SMC40 by utilizing the inverted SMC10 and SMC20, thereby generating spatiotemporal distribution maps of SMC at different depths in citrus orchard. The SSMC was susceptible to environmental factors, exhibiting significant spatiotemporal heterogeneity. In summary, this study illustrated that the integration of multiple data sources into GA-RF enhanced the estimation performance of SMC at different growth stages of late-maturing citrus orchard in the Southwest China. Additionally, it enabled the rapid and efficient monitoring of spatiotemporal variations in SMC, providing an effective method and practical foundation for precision irrigation and improved water use efficiency.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Agricultural Water Management
Agricultural Water Management 农林科学-农艺学
CiteScore
12.10
自引率
14.90%
发文量
648
审稿时长
4.9 months
期刊介绍: Agricultural Water Management publishes papers of international significance relating to the science, economics, and policy of agricultural water management. In all cases, manuscripts must address implications and provide insight regarding agricultural water management.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信