论人种学视角的必要性(和不足):以跨尺度方法开展 "学术语言 "研究

IF 1.6 2区 文学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Ramón Antonio Martínez
{"title":"论人种学视角的必要性(和不足):以跨尺度方法开展 \"学术语言 \"研究","authors":"Ramón Antonio Martínez","doi":"10.1016/j.linged.2024.101355","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This methodological commentary extends and complicates earlier discussions of the need for ethnographic approaches to exploring “academic language.” While indispensable as a tool for contextualizing classroom language use, this commentary suggests that ethnography alone is insufficient to the task of elucidating academic language in school-based settings. Drawing on ethnographic and interactional data, this article argues for the necessity of looking across multiple scales of analysis in order to apprehend the complex, nuanced, and contradictory ways in which academic language is learned, produced, and perceived in schools.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47468,"journal":{"name":"Linguistics and Education","volume":"84 ","pages":"Article 101355"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"On the necessity (and insufficiency) of ethnographic perspectives: Towards an inter-scalar approach to research on “academic language”\",\"authors\":\"Ramón Antonio Martínez\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.linged.2024.101355\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This methodological commentary extends and complicates earlier discussions of the need for ethnographic approaches to exploring “academic language.” While indispensable as a tool for contextualizing classroom language use, this commentary suggests that ethnography alone is insufficient to the task of elucidating academic language in school-based settings. Drawing on ethnographic and interactional data, this article argues for the necessity of looking across multiple scales of analysis in order to apprehend the complex, nuanced, and contradictory ways in which academic language is learned, produced, and perceived in schools.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47468,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Linguistics and Education\",\"volume\":\"84 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101355\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Linguistics and Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0898589824000883\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Linguistics and Education","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0898589824000883","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这篇方法论评论扩展了早先关于采用人种学方法探索 "学术语言 "的必要性的讨论,并使之复杂化。虽然人种学作为一种将课堂语言使用背景化的工具是不可或缺的,但本评论认为,仅靠人种学是不足以完成阐明学校环境中学术语言的任务的。本文以人种学和互动数据为基础,论证了跨越多种分析尺度的必要性,以便理解学术语言在学校中学习、生成和感知的复杂、微妙和矛盾的方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
On the necessity (and insufficiency) of ethnographic perspectives: Towards an inter-scalar approach to research on “academic language”

This methodological commentary extends and complicates earlier discussions of the need for ethnographic approaches to exploring “academic language.” While indispensable as a tool for contextualizing classroom language use, this commentary suggests that ethnography alone is insufficient to the task of elucidating academic language in school-based settings. Drawing on ethnographic and interactional data, this article argues for the necessity of looking across multiple scales of analysis in order to apprehend the complex, nuanced, and contradictory ways in which academic language is learned, produced, and perceived in schools.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
12.50%
发文量
87
期刊介绍: Linguistics and Education encourages submissions that apply theory and method from all areas of linguistics to the study of education. Areas of linguistic study include, but are not limited to: text/corpus linguistics, sociolinguistics, functional grammar, discourse analysis, critical discourse analysis, conversational analysis, linguistic anthropology/ethnography, language acquisition, language socialization, narrative studies, gesture/ sign /visual forms of communication, cognitive linguistics, literacy studies, language policy, and language ideology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信