无转移的分配:不完全信息下的福利最大化机制

IF 0.5 4区 经济学 Q4 ECONOMICS
Ethem Akyol
{"title":"无转移的分配:不完全信息下的福利最大化机制","authors":"Ethem Akyol","doi":"10.1007/s00355-024-01552-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This paper studies the allocation of multiple copies of indivisible objects to agents with multi-object demands in the absence of monetary transfers. We look for a welfare-maximizing ordinal mechanism in an incomplete information setting where agents’ preferences are <i>privately</i> known. Our main finding establishes the significant welfare gains of the so-called Ranking mechanism. When each agent’s type (values for objects) is independently drawn from an exchangeable distribution, the Ranking mechanism yields higher interim utility for all agents compared to<i> any</i> symmetric equilibrium of <i>any</i> other symmetric ordinal mechanism, regardless of the agents’ cardinal values.</p>","PeriodicalId":47663,"journal":{"name":"Social Choice and Welfare","volume":"32 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Allocation without transfers: a welfare-maximizing mechanism under incomplete information\",\"authors\":\"Ethem Akyol\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00355-024-01552-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>This paper studies the allocation of multiple copies of indivisible objects to agents with multi-object demands in the absence of monetary transfers. We look for a welfare-maximizing ordinal mechanism in an incomplete information setting where agents’ preferences are <i>privately</i> known. Our main finding establishes the significant welfare gains of the so-called Ranking mechanism. When each agent’s type (values for objects) is independently drawn from an exchangeable distribution, the Ranking mechanism yields higher interim utility for all agents compared to<i> any</i> symmetric equilibrium of <i>any</i> other symmetric ordinal mechanism, regardless of the agents’ cardinal values.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47663,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Social Choice and Welfare\",\"volume\":\"32 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Social Choice and Welfare\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00355-024-01552-z\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Choice and Welfare","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00355-024-01552-z","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文研究了在没有货币转移的情况下,向有多物品需求的代理人分配多份不可分割物品的问题。在代理人的偏好为私人所知的不完全信息环境中,我们寻找一种福利最大化的顺序机制。我们的主要发现证实了所谓的排名机制能带来显著的福利收益。当每个代理人的类型(对物品的价值)都是从可交换的分布中独立抽取时,与任何其他对称序数机制的对称均衡相比,排名机制能为所有代理人带来更高的中期效用,而与代理人的卡片价值无关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Allocation without transfers: a welfare-maximizing mechanism under incomplete information

This paper studies the allocation of multiple copies of indivisible objects to agents with multi-object demands in the absence of monetary transfers. We look for a welfare-maximizing ordinal mechanism in an incomplete information setting where agents’ preferences are privately known. Our main finding establishes the significant welfare gains of the so-called Ranking mechanism. When each agent’s type (values for objects) is independently drawn from an exchangeable distribution, the Ranking mechanism yields higher interim utility for all agents compared to any symmetric equilibrium of any other symmetric ordinal mechanism, regardless of the agents’ cardinal values.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
11.10%
发文量
56
期刊介绍: Social Choice and Welfare explores all aspects, both normative and positive, of welfare economics, collective choice, and strategic interaction. Topics include but are not limited to: preference aggregation, welfare criteria, fairness, justice and equity, rights, inequality and poverty measurement, voting and elections, political games, coalition formation, public goods, mechanism design, networks, matching, optimal taxation, cost-benefit analysis, computational social choice, judgement aggregation, market design, behavioral welfare economics, subjective well-being studies and experimental investigations related to social choice and voting. As such, the journal is inter-disciplinary and cuts across the boundaries of economics, political science, philosophy, and mathematics. Articles on choice and order theory that include results that can be applied to the above topics are also included in the journal. While it emphasizes theory, the journal also publishes empirical work in the subject area reflecting cross-fertilizing between theoretical and empirical research. Readers will find original research articles, surveys, and book reviews.Officially cited as: Soc Choice Welf
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信