来自日常生活中使用的医疗智能手表的大规模客观强直阵挛发作记录的统计特征

IF 6.6 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Epilepsia Pub Date : 2024-09-17 DOI:10.1111/epi.18109
Boyu Zhang, Weixuan V. Chen, Giulia Regalia, Daniel M. Goldenholz, Rosalind W. Picard
{"title":"来自日常生活中使用的医疗智能手表的大规模客观强直阵挛发作记录的统计特征","authors":"Boyu Zhang,&nbsp;Weixuan V. Chen,&nbsp;Giulia Regalia,&nbsp;Daniel M. Goldenholz,&nbsp;Rosalind W. Picard","doi":"10.1111/epi.18109","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>This study aimed to assess whether population-level patterns in seizure occurrence previously observed in self-reported diaries, medical records, and electroencephalographic recordings were also present in tonic–clonic seizure (TCS) diaries produced via the combined input of a US Food and Drug Administration-cleared wristband with an artificial intelligence detection algorithm and patient self-reports. We also investigated the characteristics of patient interactions with wearable seizure alerts.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We analyzed wristband data from patients with TCSs who had at least three reported TCSs over a minimum of 90 days. We quantified TCS frequency and cycles, and the relationship between the mean and variability of monthly TCS counts. We also assessed interaction metrics such as false alarm dismissal and seizure confirmation rates.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Applying strict criteria for usable data, we reviewed 137 490 TCSs from 3012 patients, with a median length of TCS alert records of 445 days (range = 90–1806). Analyses showed consistency between prior diary studies and the present data concerning (1) the distribution of monthly TCS frequency (median = 3.1, range = .08–26); (2) the linear relationship (slope = .79, <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = .83) between the logarithm of the mean and the logarithm of the SD of monthly TCS frequency (L-relationship); and (iii) the prevalence of multiple coexisting seizure cycles, including circadian (84.0%), weekly (24.6%), and long-term cycles (31.1%).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Significance</h3>\n \n <p>Key population-level patterns in seizure occurrence are recapitulated in wrist-worn device recordings, supporting their validity for tracking TCS burden. Compared to other approaches, wearables can provide noninvasive, objective, long-term data, revealing cycles in seizure risk. However, improved patient engagement with wristband alerts and further validation of detection accuracy in ambulatory settings are needed. Together, these findings suggest that data from smart wristbands may be used to derive features of TCS records and, ultimately, facilitate remote monitoring and the development of personalized forecasting tools for TCS management. Our findings may not generalize to other types of seizures.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":11768,"journal":{"name":"Epilepsia","volume":"65 11","pages":"3255-3264"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/epi.18109","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Statistical characteristics of large-scale objective tonic–clonic seizure records from medical smartwatches used in daily life\",\"authors\":\"Boyu Zhang,&nbsp;Weixuan V. Chen,&nbsp;Giulia Regalia,&nbsp;Daniel M. Goldenholz,&nbsp;Rosalind W. Picard\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/epi.18109\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objective</h3>\\n \\n <p>This study aimed to assess whether population-level patterns in seizure occurrence previously observed in self-reported diaries, medical records, and electroencephalographic recordings were also present in tonic–clonic seizure (TCS) diaries produced via the combined input of a US Food and Drug Administration-cleared wristband with an artificial intelligence detection algorithm and patient self-reports. We also investigated the characteristics of patient interactions with wearable seizure alerts.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>We analyzed wristband data from patients with TCSs who had at least three reported TCSs over a minimum of 90 days. We quantified TCS frequency and cycles, and the relationship between the mean and variability of monthly TCS counts. We also assessed interaction metrics such as false alarm dismissal and seizure confirmation rates.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Applying strict criteria for usable data, we reviewed 137 490 TCSs from 3012 patients, with a median length of TCS alert records of 445 days (range = 90–1806). Analyses showed consistency between prior diary studies and the present data concerning (1) the distribution of monthly TCS frequency (median = 3.1, range = .08–26); (2) the linear relationship (slope = .79, <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = .83) between the logarithm of the mean and the logarithm of the SD of monthly TCS frequency (L-relationship); and (iii) the prevalence of multiple coexisting seizure cycles, including circadian (84.0%), weekly (24.6%), and long-term cycles (31.1%).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Significance</h3>\\n \\n <p>Key population-level patterns in seizure occurrence are recapitulated in wrist-worn device recordings, supporting their validity for tracking TCS burden. Compared to other approaches, wearables can provide noninvasive, objective, long-term data, revealing cycles in seizure risk. However, improved patient engagement with wristband alerts and further validation of detection accuracy in ambulatory settings are needed. Together, these findings suggest that data from smart wristbands may be used to derive features of TCS records and, ultimately, facilitate remote monitoring and the development of personalized forecasting tools for TCS management. Our findings may not generalize to other types of seizures.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11768,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Epilepsia\",\"volume\":\"65 11\",\"pages\":\"3255-3264\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/epi.18109\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Epilepsia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/epi.18109\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Epilepsia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/epi.18109","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的本研究旨在评估以前在自我报告日记、医疗记录和脑电图记录中观察到的人群水平的癫痫发作模式是否也存在于强直阵挛发作(TCS)日记中,该日记是通过美国食品药品管理局批准的腕带与人工智能检测算法和患者自我报告联合输入而生成的。我们还调查了患者与可穿戴癫痫发作警报互动的特点。方法我们分析了至少在 90 天内报告过三次 TCS 的 TCS 患者的腕带数据。我们量化了 TCS 频率和周期,以及每月 TCS 计数的平均值和变异性之间的关系。我们还评估了交互指标,如误报排除率和发作确认率。结果应用严格的可用数据标准,我们审查了来自 3012 名患者的 137 490 次 TCS,TCS 警报记录的中位长度为 445 天(范围 = 90-1806)。分析表明,先前的日记研究与本数据在以下方面具有一致性:(1) 每月 TCS 频率的分布(中位数 = 3.1,范围 = .08-26);(2) 每月 TCS 频率的平均值对数与 SD 对数之间的线性关系(斜率 = .79,R2 = .83)(L-关系);(iii) 多种并存发作周期的普遍性,包括昼夜节律(84.意义腕戴式设备记录再现了癫痫发作的主要人群水平模式,支持其追踪 TCS 负担的有效性。与其他方法相比,可穿戴设备可以提供无创、客观、长期的数据,揭示癫痫发作风险的周期。不过,还需要提高患者对腕带警报的参与度,并进一步验证在非卧床环境中的检测准确性。总之,这些研究结果表明,智能腕带的数据可用于推导 TCS 记录的特征,并最终促进远程监控和 TCS 管理个性化预测工具的开发。我们的研究结果可能不适用于其他类型的癫痫发作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Statistical characteristics of large-scale objective tonic–clonic seizure records from medical smartwatches used in daily life

Statistical characteristics of large-scale objective tonic–clonic seizure records from medical smartwatches used in daily life

Objective

This study aimed to assess whether population-level patterns in seizure occurrence previously observed in self-reported diaries, medical records, and electroencephalographic recordings were also present in tonic–clonic seizure (TCS) diaries produced via the combined input of a US Food and Drug Administration-cleared wristband with an artificial intelligence detection algorithm and patient self-reports. We also investigated the characteristics of patient interactions with wearable seizure alerts.

Methods

We analyzed wristband data from patients with TCSs who had at least three reported TCSs over a minimum of 90 days. We quantified TCS frequency and cycles, and the relationship between the mean and variability of monthly TCS counts. We also assessed interaction metrics such as false alarm dismissal and seizure confirmation rates.

Results

Applying strict criteria for usable data, we reviewed 137 490 TCSs from 3012 patients, with a median length of TCS alert records of 445 days (range = 90–1806). Analyses showed consistency between prior diary studies and the present data concerning (1) the distribution of monthly TCS frequency (median = 3.1, range = .08–26); (2) the linear relationship (slope = .79, R2 = .83) between the logarithm of the mean and the logarithm of the SD of monthly TCS frequency (L-relationship); and (iii) the prevalence of multiple coexisting seizure cycles, including circadian (84.0%), weekly (24.6%), and long-term cycles (31.1%).

Significance

Key population-level patterns in seizure occurrence are recapitulated in wrist-worn device recordings, supporting their validity for tracking TCS burden. Compared to other approaches, wearables can provide noninvasive, objective, long-term data, revealing cycles in seizure risk. However, improved patient engagement with wristband alerts and further validation of detection accuracy in ambulatory settings are needed. Together, these findings suggest that data from smart wristbands may be used to derive features of TCS records and, ultimately, facilitate remote monitoring and the development of personalized forecasting tools for TCS management. Our findings may not generalize to other types of seizures.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Epilepsia
Epilepsia 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
10.70%
发文量
319
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Epilepsia is the leading, authoritative source for innovative clinical and basic science research for all aspects of epilepsy and seizures. In addition, Epilepsia publishes critical reviews, opinion pieces, and guidelines that foster understanding and aim to improve the diagnosis and treatment of people with seizures and epilepsy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信