扰动效用路线选择模型中的替代问题

Mogens Fosgerau, Nikolaj Nielsen, Mads Paulsen, Thomas Kjær Rasmussen, Rui Yao
{"title":"扰动效用路线选择模型中的替代问题","authors":"Mogens Fosgerau, Nikolaj Nielsen, Mads Paulsen, Thomas Kjær Rasmussen, Rui Yao","doi":"arxiv-2409.08347","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper considers substitution patterns in the perturbed utility route\nchoice model. We provide a general result that determines the marginal change\nin link flows following a marginal change in link costs across the network. We\ngive a general condition on the network structure under which all paths are\nnecessarily substitutes and an example in which some paths are complements. The\npresence of complementarity contradicts a result in a previous paper in this\njournal; we point out and correct the error.","PeriodicalId":501293,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - ECON - Econometrics","volume":"4 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Substitution in the perturbed utility route choice model\",\"authors\":\"Mogens Fosgerau, Nikolaj Nielsen, Mads Paulsen, Thomas Kjær Rasmussen, Rui Yao\",\"doi\":\"arxiv-2409.08347\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper considers substitution patterns in the perturbed utility route\\nchoice model. We provide a general result that determines the marginal change\\nin link flows following a marginal change in link costs across the network. We\\ngive a general condition on the network structure under which all paths are\\nnecessarily substitutes and an example in which some paths are complements. The\\npresence of complementarity contradicts a result in a previous paper in this\\njournal; we point out and correct the error.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501293,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"arXiv - ECON - Econometrics\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"arXiv - ECON - Econometrics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/arxiv-2409.08347\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - ECON - Econometrics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2409.08347","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文探讨了扰动效用路径选择模型中的替代模式。我们提供了一个一般结果,它决定了整个网络中链接成本发生边际变化后链接流量的边际变化。我们给出了网络结构的一般条件,在此条件下,所有路径都不一定是替代路径,并举例说明了某些路径是互补路径的情况。互补性的存在与本刊之前一篇论文中的结果相矛盾;我们指出并纠正了这一错误。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Substitution in the perturbed utility route choice model
This paper considers substitution patterns in the perturbed utility route choice model. We provide a general result that determines the marginal change in link flows following a marginal change in link costs across the network. We give a general condition on the network structure under which all paths are necessarily substitutes and an example in which some paths are complements. The presence of complementarity contradicts a result in a previous paper in this journal; we point out and correct the error.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信