血管内动静脉瘘是血液透析患者的可行替代方案吗?

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q3 HEMATOLOGY
Hugo Vergara-Pérez,Raúl Diaitz-Usetxi Laplaza,Alejandro Pérez Alba,Pablo Baliño Remiro,Asunción Rius Peris,M Ángeles Fenollosa Segarra,Alejandro Tamayo Vasquez,Javier Reque
{"title":"血管内动静脉瘘是血液透析患者的可行替代方案吗?","authors":"Hugo Vergara-Pérez,Raúl Diaitz-Usetxi Laplaza,Alejandro Pérez Alba,Pablo Baliño Remiro,Asunción Rius Peris,M Ángeles Fenollosa Segarra,Alejandro Tamayo Vasquez,Javier Reque","doi":"10.1159/000541233","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION\r\nFor hemodialysis (HD) patients, the selection of vascular access (VA) is a crucial factor that significantly affects morbidity and mortality. Historically, native Arteriovenous Fistulas (AVFs) have been established using surgical techniques. However, devices facilitating percutaneous endovascular arteriovenous fistula formation have recently been introduced in clinical practice, showing promising initial evidence. The primary objectives were technical success, efficacy, and cannulation rates. The secondary objectives included primary and cumulative patency, safety, and the number of procedures required to maintain fistula patency.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nA prospective, single-center, single-arm study that included all patients who underwent endovascular arteriovenous fistulas (endoAVF) creation using the WavelinQ™ EndoAVF System at a University Hospital between December 2021 and August 2023.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nA total of 20 patients who underwent an endoAVF were included. Technical success was 100%. 75% (15) of the endoAVFs met the criteria for physiological suitability. The cannulation rate was 66% (10/15) for endoAVFs that reached physiological suitability. At 6 months of follow-up, the primary and cumulative patency rates were 65% and 75%, respectively; at 12 months, these were 50% and 70%, respectively. Serious adverse events were not observed. The reintervention rate was 0.33 procedures/patient-year.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSION\r\nBased on our experience, creating AVFs using the WavelinQ 4-F EndoAVF system is safe and effective, with high technical success rates and acceptable patency and reintervention rates.","PeriodicalId":8953,"journal":{"name":"Blood Purification","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Is endovascular arteriovenous fistula a feasible alternative for hemodialysis patients?\",\"authors\":\"Hugo Vergara-Pérez,Raúl Diaitz-Usetxi Laplaza,Alejandro Pérez Alba,Pablo Baliño Remiro,Asunción Rius Peris,M Ángeles Fenollosa Segarra,Alejandro Tamayo Vasquez,Javier Reque\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000541233\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"INTRODUCTION\\r\\nFor hemodialysis (HD) patients, the selection of vascular access (VA) is a crucial factor that significantly affects morbidity and mortality. Historically, native Arteriovenous Fistulas (AVFs) have been established using surgical techniques. However, devices facilitating percutaneous endovascular arteriovenous fistula formation have recently been introduced in clinical practice, showing promising initial evidence. The primary objectives were technical success, efficacy, and cannulation rates. The secondary objectives included primary and cumulative patency, safety, and the number of procedures required to maintain fistula patency.\\r\\n\\r\\nMETHODS\\r\\nA prospective, single-center, single-arm study that included all patients who underwent endovascular arteriovenous fistulas (endoAVF) creation using the WavelinQ™ EndoAVF System at a University Hospital between December 2021 and August 2023.\\r\\n\\r\\nRESULTS\\r\\nA total of 20 patients who underwent an endoAVF were included. Technical success was 100%. 75% (15) of the endoAVFs met the criteria for physiological suitability. The cannulation rate was 66% (10/15) for endoAVFs that reached physiological suitability. At 6 months of follow-up, the primary and cumulative patency rates were 65% and 75%, respectively; at 12 months, these were 50% and 70%, respectively. Serious adverse events were not observed. The reintervention rate was 0.33 procedures/patient-year.\\r\\n\\r\\nCONCLUSION\\r\\nBased on our experience, creating AVFs using the WavelinQ 4-F EndoAVF system is safe and effective, with high technical success rates and acceptable patency and reintervention rates.\",\"PeriodicalId\":8953,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Blood Purification\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Blood Purification\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000541233\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Blood Purification","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000541233","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言对于血液透析(HD)患者来说,血管通路(VA)的选择是一个关键因素,对发病率和死亡率有重大影响。一直以来,原生动静脉瘘(AVF)都是通过外科技术建立的。然而,最近临床实践中出现了促进经皮血管内动静脉瘘形成的设备,并显示出良好的初步效果。研究的首要目标是技术成功率、疗效和插管率。方法该研究是一项前瞻性、单中心、单臂研究,纳入了 2021 年 12 月至 2023 年 8 月期间在一家大学医院使用 WavelinQ™ EndoAVF 系统进行血管内动静脉瘘(endoAVF)成形术的所有患者。结果共纳入了 20 名进行血管内动静脉瘘成形术的患者。技术成功率为 100%。75%(15 例)的腔内腹腔引流符合生理适宜性标准。达到生理适宜标准的内腔静脉输液的插管率为 66%(10/15)。随访 6 个月时,主要通畅率和累积通畅率分别为 65% 和 75%;随访 12 个月时,主要通畅率和累积通畅率分别为 50% 和 70%。未观察到严重不良事件。结论根据我们的经验,使用 WavelinQ 4-F EndoAVF 系统创建 AVF 安全有效,技术成功率高,通畅率和再介入率均可接受。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Is endovascular arteriovenous fistula a feasible alternative for hemodialysis patients?
INTRODUCTION For hemodialysis (HD) patients, the selection of vascular access (VA) is a crucial factor that significantly affects morbidity and mortality. Historically, native Arteriovenous Fistulas (AVFs) have been established using surgical techniques. However, devices facilitating percutaneous endovascular arteriovenous fistula formation have recently been introduced in clinical practice, showing promising initial evidence. The primary objectives were technical success, efficacy, and cannulation rates. The secondary objectives included primary and cumulative patency, safety, and the number of procedures required to maintain fistula patency. METHODS A prospective, single-center, single-arm study that included all patients who underwent endovascular arteriovenous fistulas (endoAVF) creation using the WavelinQ™ EndoAVF System at a University Hospital between December 2021 and August 2023. RESULTS A total of 20 patients who underwent an endoAVF were included. Technical success was 100%. 75% (15) of the endoAVFs met the criteria for physiological suitability. The cannulation rate was 66% (10/15) for endoAVFs that reached physiological suitability. At 6 months of follow-up, the primary and cumulative patency rates were 65% and 75%, respectively; at 12 months, these were 50% and 70%, respectively. Serious adverse events were not observed. The reintervention rate was 0.33 procedures/patient-year. CONCLUSION Based on our experience, creating AVFs using the WavelinQ 4-F EndoAVF system is safe and effective, with high technical success rates and acceptable patency and reintervention rates.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Blood Purification
Blood Purification 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
3.30%
发文量
69
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Practical information on hemodialysis, hemofiltration, peritoneal dialysis and apheresis is featured in this journal. Recognizing the critical importance of equipment and procedures, particular emphasis has been placed on reports, drawn from a wide range of fields, describing technical advances and improvements in methodology. Papers reflect the search for cost-effective solutions which increase not only patient survival but also patient comfort and disease improvement through prevention or correction of undesirable effects. Advances in vascular access and blood anticoagulation, problems associated with exposure of blood to foreign surfaces and acute-care nephrology, including continuous therapies, also receive attention. Nephrologists, internists, intensivists and hospital staff involved in dialysis, apheresis and immunoadsorption for acute and chronic solid organ failure will find this journal useful and informative. ''Blood Purification'' also serves as a platform for multidisciplinary experiences involving nephrologists, cardiologists and critical care physicians in order to expand the level of interaction between different disciplines and specialities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信