治疗偏好与疗效之间的差异

IF 1.1 4区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Cody Morris, Elise A. Zarcaro, Jesse Perrin, Megan E. Ellsworth
{"title":"治疗偏好与疗效之间的差异","authors":"Cody Morris, Elise A. Zarcaro, Jesse Perrin, Megan E. Ellsworth","doi":"10.1002/bin.2057","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Involving clients in therapeutic decisions is a crucial component of effective and ethical behavior‐analytic practice. However, discrepancies between client preference for treatment options and treatment effectiveness are possible in the course of treatment. The purpose of this paper is to advance the discussion of discrepancies between client preference for treatment options and treatment effectiveness by (a) reviewing relevant considerations for adapted strategies to involve clients with limited prerequisite skills in therapeutic decisions, (b) presenting clinical data that exemplifies discrepancies between client preference for treatment options and treatment effectiveness, (c) describing nuanced considerations for navigating discrepancies, and (d) providing suggestions for future research on this topic.","PeriodicalId":47138,"journal":{"name":"Behavioral Interventions","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Discrepancies between treatment preference and effectiveness\",\"authors\":\"Cody Morris, Elise A. Zarcaro, Jesse Perrin, Megan E. Ellsworth\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/bin.2057\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Involving clients in therapeutic decisions is a crucial component of effective and ethical behavior‐analytic practice. However, discrepancies between client preference for treatment options and treatment effectiveness are possible in the course of treatment. The purpose of this paper is to advance the discussion of discrepancies between client preference for treatment options and treatment effectiveness by (a) reviewing relevant considerations for adapted strategies to involve clients with limited prerequisite skills in therapeutic decisions, (b) presenting clinical data that exemplifies discrepancies between client preference for treatment options and treatment effectiveness, (c) describing nuanced considerations for navigating discrepancies, and (d) providing suggestions for future research on this topic.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47138,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Behavioral Interventions\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Behavioral Interventions\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/bin.2057\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavioral Interventions","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/bin.2057","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

让客户参与治疗决策是有效和符合道德规范的行为分析实践的重要组成部分。然而,在治疗过程中,求助者对治疗方案的偏好与治疗效果之间可能存在差异。本文旨在通过(a)回顾让先决条件技能有限的客户参与治疗决策的调整策略的相关注意事项,(b)展示客户对治疗方案的偏好与治疗效果之间存在差异的临床数据,(c)描述驾驭差异的细微注意事项,以及(d)为该主题的未来研究提供建议,从而推动对客户对治疗方案的偏好与治疗效果之间存在差异的讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Discrepancies between treatment preference and effectiveness
Involving clients in therapeutic decisions is a crucial component of effective and ethical behavior‐analytic practice. However, discrepancies between client preference for treatment options and treatment effectiveness are possible in the course of treatment. The purpose of this paper is to advance the discussion of discrepancies between client preference for treatment options and treatment effectiveness by (a) reviewing relevant considerations for adapted strategies to involve clients with limited prerequisite skills in therapeutic decisions, (b) presenting clinical data that exemplifies discrepancies between client preference for treatment options and treatment effectiveness, (c) describing nuanced considerations for navigating discrepancies, and (d) providing suggestions for future research on this topic.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Behavioral Interventions
Behavioral Interventions PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
20.00%
发文量
66
期刊介绍: Behavioral Interventions aims to report research and practice involving the utilization of behavioral techniques in the treatment, education, assessment and training of students, clients or patients, as well as training techniques used with staff. Behavioral Interventions publishes: (1) research articles, (2) brief reports (a short report of an innovative technique or intervention that may be less rigorous than a research report), (3) topical literature reviews and discussion articles, (4) book reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信