法医心理健康新手和专家的后见之明偏见:一项探索性研究

Michael A. Weber, Joëlle N. Albrecht, Jérôme Endrass, Delia Humbel, Dominique R. Meier, Jay P. Singh, Juliane Gerth
{"title":"法医心理健康新手和专家的后见之明偏见:一项探索性研究","authors":"Michael A. Weber, Joëlle N. Albrecht, Jérôme Endrass, Delia Humbel, Dominique R. Meier, Jay P. Singh, Juliane Gerth","doi":"10.1080/24732850.2024.2396991","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Decision-making processes are vulnerable to cognitive biases like hindsight bias, with particularly fateful consequences in forensic contexts. However, while debiasing strategies have been effectiv...","PeriodicalId":89973,"journal":{"name":"Journal of forensic psychology practice","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Hindsight Bias in Forensic Mental Health Novices and Experts: An Exploratory Study\",\"authors\":\"Michael A. Weber, Joëlle N. Albrecht, Jérôme Endrass, Delia Humbel, Dominique R. Meier, Jay P. Singh, Juliane Gerth\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/24732850.2024.2396991\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Decision-making processes are vulnerable to cognitive biases like hindsight bias, with particularly fateful consequences in forensic contexts. However, while debiasing strategies have been effectiv...\",\"PeriodicalId\":89973,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of forensic psychology practice\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of forensic psychology practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/24732850.2024.2396991\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of forensic psychology practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/24732850.2024.2396991","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

决策过程很容易受到认知偏差(如事后诸葛亮)的影响,在法医领域尤其如此。然而,尽管消除偏差的策略已经取得了一定的效果,但在法医领域,这些策略还存在着很大的局限性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Hindsight Bias in Forensic Mental Health Novices and Experts: An Exploratory Study
Decision-making processes are vulnerable to cognitive biases like hindsight bias, with particularly fateful consequences in forensic contexts. However, while debiasing strategies have been effectiv...
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信