各类高果糖饮料与儿童和青少年哮喘关系的系统回顾和荟萃分析

IF 1.9 Q3 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
Fatemeh Keshavarz, Mobina Zeinalabedini, Soraiya Ebrahimpour-Koujan, Leila Azadbakht
{"title":"各类高果糖饮料与儿童和青少年哮喘关系的系统回顾和荟萃分析","authors":"Fatemeh Keshavarz, Mobina Zeinalabedini, Soraiya Ebrahimpour-Koujan, Leila Azadbakht","doi":"10.1186/s40795-024-00930-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Asthma has become the most common chronic condition among children in recent decades. Environmental factors, including food, drive its rise. Sweetened beverages are a staple of children’s diets and cause various health issues. Therefore, this research aims to evaluate the association of all types of high fructose beverages with asthma in children. We assessed observational studies published before November 2023, obtained from PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science. The quality of articles was assessed by using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Studies with a pediatric population under 18 years that indicate the association between all kinds of beverages containing high fructose and asthma and evaluated risk estimates with 95% confidence intervals were included. We also followed Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA). In the final analysis, we included eleven studies with 164,118 individuals. Twenty-one effect sizes indicated a significant positive association between sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs) consumption and odds of asthma (OR: 1.28; 95% CI: 1.15–1.42; Pvalue < 0.001). Three effect sizes showed that total excess free fructose (tEFF) intake increases children’s asthma odds by 2.7 times (pooled OR: 2.73; 95% CI: 1.30–5.73; Pvalue =0.008). However, five effect sizes in 100% fruit juice failed to show statically association with asthma prevalence in children (pooled OR: 1.43; 95%CI: 0.91–2.23; Pvalue =0.12). In summary, SSB and tEFF raised asthma probabilities. No relationship was found between fruit juice and asthma in children and adolescents. We need more cohort studies with correct age selection to identify the precise link.","PeriodicalId":36422,"journal":{"name":"BMC Nutrition","volume":"42 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A systematic review and meta-analysis of the association of all types of beverages high in fructose with asthma in children and adolescents\",\"authors\":\"Fatemeh Keshavarz, Mobina Zeinalabedini, Soraiya Ebrahimpour-Koujan, Leila Azadbakht\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s40795-024-00930-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Asthma has become the most common chronic condition among children in recent decades. Environmental factors, including food, drive its rise. Sweetened beverages are a staple of children’s diets and cause various health issues. Therefore, this research aims to evaluate the association of all types of high fructose beverages with asthma in children. We assessed observational studies published before November 2023, obtained from PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science. The quality of articles was assessed by using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Studies with a pediatric population under 18 years that indicate the association between all kinds of beverages containing high fructose and asthma and evaluated risk estimates with 95% confidence intervals were included. We also followed Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA). In the final analysis, we included eleven studies with 164,118 individuals. Twenty-one effect sizes indicated a significant positive association between sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs) consumption and odds of asthma (OR: 1.28; 95% CI: 1.15–1.42; Pvalue < 0.001). Three effect sizes showed that total excess free fructose (tEFF) intake increases children’s asthma odds by 2.7 times (pooled OR: 2.73; 95% CI: 1.30–5.73; Pvalue =0.008). However, five effect sizes in 100% fruit juice failed to show statically association with asthma prevalence in children (pooled OR: 1.43; 95%CI: 0.91–2.23; Pvalue =0.12). In summary, SSB and tEFF raised asthma probabilities. No relationship was found between fruit juice and asthma in children and adolescents. We need more cohort studies with correct age selection to identify the precise link.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36422,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Nutrition\",\"volume\":\"42 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Nutrition\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40795-024-00930-1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"NUTRITION & DIETETICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40795-024-00930-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

近几十年来,哮喘已成为儿童最常见的慢性疾病。包括食物在内的环境因素是导致哮喘发病率上升的原因。甜饮料是儿童的主食,会引起各种健康问题。因此,本研究旨在评估各种类型的高果糖饮料与儿童哮喘的关系。我们评估了从 PubMed、Scopus 和 Web of Science 上获取的 2023 年 11 月之前发表的观察性研究。文章质量采用纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表进行评估。纳入的研究对象为 18 岁以下的儿童,这些研究指出了各种含高果糖的饮料与哮喘之间的关系,并评估了带有 95% 置信区间的风险估计值。我们还遵循了《系统综述和荟萃分析首选报告项目》(PRISMA)。在最终分析中,我们纳入了 11 项研究,涉及 164 118 人。21 个效应大小表明,饮用含糖饮料 (SSB) 与哮喘几率之间存在显著的正相关关系(OR:1.28;95% CI:1.15-1.42;P 值<0.001)。三个效应大小显示,过量游离果糖(tEFF)总摄入量会使儿童哮喘几率增加 2.7 倍(汇总 OR:2.73;95% CI:1.30-5.73;P 值 =0.008)。然而,100% 果汁中的五个效应大小未能显示出与儿童哮喘发病率的统计学关联(汇总 OR:1.43;95%CI:0.91-2.23;P 值 =0.12)。总之,SSB 和 tEFF 提高了哮喘发生的概率。在儿童和青少年中,没有发现果汁与哮喘之间的关系。我们需要更多正确选择年龄的队列研究来确定两者之间的确切联系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A systematic review and meta-analysis of the association of all types of beverages high in fructose with asthma in children and adolescents
Asthma has become the most common chronic condition among children in recent decades. Environmental factors, including food, drive its rise. Sweetened beverages are a staple of children’s diets and cause various health issues. Therefore, this research aims to evaluate the association of all types of high fructose beverages with asthma in children. We assessed observational studies published before November 2023, obtained from PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science. The quality of articles was assessed by using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Studies with a pediatric population under 18 years that indicate the association between all kinds of beverages containing high fructose and asthma and evaluated risk estimates with 95% confidence intervals were included. We also followed Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA). In the final analysis, we included eleven studies with 164,118 individuals. Twenty-one effect sizes indicated a significant positive association between sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs) consumption and odds of asthma (OR: 1.28; 95% CI: 1.15–1.42; Pvalue < 0.001). Three effect sizes showed that total excess free fructose (tEFF) intake increases children’s asthma odds by 2.7 times (pooled OR: 2.73; 95% CI: 1.30–5.73; Pvalue =0.008). However, five effect sizes in 100% fruit juice failed to show statically association with asthma prevalence in children (pooled OR: 1.43; 95%CI: 0.91–2.23; Pvalue =0.12). In summary, SSB and tEFF raised asthma probabilities. No relationship was found between fruit juice and asthma in children and adolescents. We need more cohort studies with correct age selection to identify the precise link.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Nutrition
BMC Nutrition Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
131
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信