浓缩生长因子对面神经挤压伤的疗效。

IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Emre Balaban,Emine Demir,Özlem Çelebi Erdivanlı,Tolga Mercantepe,Fatih Mehmet Gökçe,Levent Tümkaya,Engin Dursun
{"title":"浓缩生长因子对面神经挤压伤的疗效。","authors":"Emre Balaban,Emine Demir,Özlem Çelebi Erdivanlı,Tolga Mercantepe,Fatih Mehmet Gökçe,Levent Tümkaya,Engin Dursun","doi":"10.1016/j.jormas.2024.102071","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AIM\r\nTo evaluate the effect of concentrated growth factor (CGF) on regeneration of facial nerve after crush injury.\r\n\r\nMATERIALS AND METHODS\r\nFourteen rats were randomized into two groups. The control group (CG) (n = 7) received a crush injury to the right facial nerve. The CGF group (CGFG) (n = 7) received a crush injury to the right facial nerve and concentrated growth factor prepared from their own blood thereafter. Left facial nerves were used for functional comparison. Nerve function was evaluated using whisker movements and electromyography. Histologic properties were evaluated using hematoxylin and eosin and Masson-trichrome staining, and immunohistochemical properties were evaluated using Neurofilament-H and Anti-Tau degeneration markers.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nIn the CGFG, whisker functions began to recover earlier and recovered more quickly compared with the CG. The CG showed significantly prolonged latency and reduced amplitudes in the first week compared with the CGFG (p < 0.05). Recordings of 4th-week latency and amplitudes were similar to the preoperative period in the CGFG (p > 0.05), whereas recordings of the same week were significantly worse in the CG (p < 0.05). Edema and fibrosis were also more pronounced in the CG compared with the CGFG. Neurofilament-H and Anti-Tau were at significantly high levels in the CG (p < 0.05).\r\n\r\nCONCLUSION\r\nConcentrated growth factor promotes recovery in facial crush injury and may prove a cost-effective, practical, and effective treatment choice in peripheral nerve injury.","PeriodicalId":55993,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Stomatology Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery","volume":"51 1","pages":"102071"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The effectiveness of concentrated growth factor in facial nerve crush injury.\",\"authors\":\"Emre Balaban,Emine Demir,Özlem Çelebi Erdivanlı,Tolga Mercantepe,Fatih Mehmet Gökçe,Levent Tümkaya,Engin Dursun\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jormas.2024.102071\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"AIM\\r\\nTo evaluate the effect of concentrated growth factor (CGF) on regeneration of facial nerve after crush injury.\\r\\n\\r\\nMATERIALS AND METHODS\\r\\nFourteen rats were randomized into two groups. The control group (CG) (n = 7) received a crush injury to the right facial nerve. The CGF group (CGFG) (n = 7) received a crush injury to the right facial nerve and concentrated growth factor prepared from their own blood thereafter. Left facial nerves were used for functional comparison. Nerve function was evaluated using whisker movements and electromyography. Histologic properties were evaluated using hematoxylin and eosin and Masson-trichrome staining, and immunohistochemical properties were evaluated using Neurofilament-H and Anti-Tau degeneration markers.\\r\\n\\r\\nRESULTS\\r\\nIn the CGFG, whisker functions began to recover earlier and recovered more quickly compared with the CG. The CG showed significantly prolonged latency and reduced amplitudes in the first week compared with the CGFG (p < 0.05). Recordings of 4th-week latency and amplitudes were similar to the preoperative period in the CGFG (p > 0.05), whereas recordings of the same week were significantly worse in the CG (p < 0.05). Edema and fibrosis were also more pronounced in the CG compared with the CGFG. Neurofilament-H and Anti-Tau were at significantly high levels in the CG (p < 0.05).\\r\\n\\r\\nCONCLUSION\\r\\nConcentrated growth factor promotes recovery in facial crush injury and may prove a cost-effective, practical, and effective treatment choice in peripheral nerve injury.\",\"PeriodicalId\":55993,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Stomatology Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery\",\"volume\":\"51 1\",\"pages\":\"102071\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Stomatology Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jormas.2024.102071\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Stomatology Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jormas.2024.102071","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

材料与方法将 14 只大鼠随机分为两组。对照组(CG)(n = 7)右侧面神经受到挤压伤。对照组(CG)(n = 7)接受右侧面神经挤压伤,之后接受从自身血液中制备的浓缩生长因子。左侧面神经用于功能比较。使用胡须运动和肌电图评估神经功能。使用苏木精、伊红和 Masson-trichrome 染色法评估组织学特性,使用 Neurofilament-H 和 Anti-Tau 退化标记物评估免疫组化特性。与 CGFG 相比,CG 在第一周的潜伏期明显延长,振幅明显降低(p < 0.05)。CGFG 第四周的潜伏期和振幅记录与术前相似(p > 0.05),而 CG 同一周的记录则明显较差(p < 0.05)。与 CGFG 相比,CG 的水肿和纤维化也更为明显。结论:浓缩生长因子可促进面部挤压伤的恢复,可能被证明是一种经济、实用、有效的周围神经损伤治疗方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The effectiveness of concentrated growth factor in facial nerve crush injury.
AIM To evaluate the effect of concentrated growth factor (CGF) on regeneration of facial nerve after crush injury. MATERIALS AND METHODS Fourteen rats were randomized into two groups. The control group (CG) (n = 7) received a crush injury to the right facial nerve. The CGF group (CGFG) (n = 7) received a crush injury to the right facial nerve and concentrated growth factor prepared from their own blood thereafter. Left facial nerves were used for functional comparison. Nerve function was evaluated using whisker movements and electromyography. Histologic properties were evaluated using hematoxylin and eosin and Masson-trichrome staining, and immunohistochemical properties were evaluated using Neurofilament-H and Anti-Tau degeneration markers. RESULTS In the CGFG, whisker functions began to recover earlier and recovered more quickly compared with the CG. The CG showed significantly prolonged latency and reduced amplitudes in the first week compared with the CGFG (p < 0.05). Recordings of 4th-week latency and amplitudes were similar to the preoperative period in the CGFG (p > 0.05), whereas recordings of the same week were significantly worse in the CG (p < 0.05). Edema and fibrosis were also more pronounced in the CG compared with the CGFG. Neurofilament-H and Anti-Tau were at significantly high levels in the CG (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION Concentrated growth factor promotes recovery in facial crush injury and may prove a cost-effective, practical, and effective treatment choice in peripheral nerve injury.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Stomatology Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Journal of Stomatology Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Surgery, Dentistry, Oral Surgery and Medicine, Otorhinolaryngology and Facial Plastic Surgery
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
9.10%
发文量
0
审稿时长
23 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信