颅颈交界处 3d 透视导航器械 C2 神经根切除新改良技术的安全性和有效性

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Lukas Bobinski, Linda Sandberg, Frida Bylander, Hampus Hållberg, Anders Berglund, John M. Duff
{"title":"颅颈交界处 3d 透视导航器械 C2 神经根切除新改良技术的安全性和有效性","authors":"Lukas Bobinski, Linda Sandberg, Frida Bylander, Hampus Hållberg, Anders Berglund, John M. Duff","doi":"10.1007/s00701-024-06265-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Purpose</h3><p>Instrumentation of the C1 vertebra requires either mobilization or transection of the C2 nerve root. This study investigates clinical and radiological outcomes and incidences of C2 neuropathic pain after posterior instrumented fusion in the cranio-cervical junction with or without division of the C2 nerve roots.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Methods</h3><p>This retrospective study compared two cohorts of patients who underwent instrumented fusion in the cranio-cervical junction. Fifty patients (22 males and 28 females) were operated with complete resection of C2 nerve root ganglion (Ex group), and fifty-one patients (30 men, 21 women) with C2 nerve roots preservation (No group).</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>The incidence of postoperative C2 neuropathy was eight times lower in the Ex group compared to the No group that was statistical significant, <i>p</i> = 0.039. Surgical time was significantly shorter in the No group (<i>p</i> = 0.001). The fusion rates were very high for both groups, without difference between groups (<i>p</i> = 1.0). Autografting from the iliac crest (<i>p</i> = 0.001) as well as postoperative immobilisation with a hard collar (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001) were required in fewer patients in the Ex group. Also, patients in the Ex group were mobilised faster after surgery (<i>p</i> = 0.49). Overall, complication rates were similar between groups, but the Ex group demonstrated fewer major medical complications (16% vs 31%). Male sex and iliac bone harvesting demonstrated significantly higher OR for development of postoperative complications (<i>p</i> = 0.023 and <i>p</i> = 0.034 respectively) and postoperative mobilization demonstrated significant higher OR for development of postoperative major complications (<i>p</i> = 0.042).</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusions</h3><p>Resection of the C2 nerve root ganglion during posterior instrumented fusion of the cranio-cervical junction is safe and rarely leads to C2 neuropathy. The technique tends to mitigate the odds of developing postoperative complications.</p>","PeriodicalId":7370,"journal":{"name":"Acta Neurochirurgica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Safety and efficacy of the new modified technique for c2 nerve root resection in 3d fluoroscopy navigated instrumentation in the cranio-cervical junction\",\"authors\":\"Lukas Bobinski, Linda Sandberg, Frida Bylander, Hampus Hållberg, Anders Berglund, John M. Duff\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00701-024-06265-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Purpose</h3><p>Instrumentation of the C1 vertebra requires either mobilization or transection of the C2 nerve root. This study investigates clinical and radiological outcomes and incidences of C2 neuropathic pain after posterior instrumented fusion in the cranio-cervical junction with or without division of the C2 nerve roots.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Methods</h3><p>This retrospective study compared two cohorts of patients who underwent instrumented fusion in the cranio-cervical junction. Fifty patients (22 males and 28 females) were operated with complete resection of C2 nerve root ganglion (Ex group), and fifty-one patients (30 men, 21 women) with C2 nerve roots preservation (No group).</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Results</h3><p>The incidence of postoperative C2 neuropathy was eight times lower in the Ex group compared to the No group that was statistical significant, <i>p</i> = 0.039. Surgical time was significantly shorter in the No group (<i>p</i> = 0.001). The fusion rates were very high for both groups, without difference between groups (<i>p</i> = 1.0). Autografting from the iliac crest (<i>p</i> = 0.001) as well as postoperative immobilisation with a hard collar (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001) were required in fewer patients in the Ex group. Also, patients in the Ex group were mobilised faster after surgery (<i>p</i> = 0.49). Overall, complication rates were similar between groups, but the Ex group demonstrated fewer major medical complications (16% vs 31%). Male sex and iliac bone harvesting demonstrated significantly higher OR for development of postoperative complications (<i>p</i> = 0.023 and <i>p</i> = 0.034 respectively) and postoperative mobilization demonstrated significant higher OR for development of postoperative major complications (<i>p</i> = 0.042).</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Conclusions</h3><p>Resection of the C2 nerve root ganglion during posterior instrumented fusion of the cranio-cervical junction is safe and rarely leads to C2 neuropathy. The technique tends to mitigate the odds of developing postoperative complications.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7370,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Neurochirurgica\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Neurochirurgica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-024-06265-x\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Neurochirurgica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-024-06265-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的C1椎体的器械融合需要移动或切断C2神经根。本研究探讨了在颅颈交界处进行后路器械融合术并切除或不切除 C2 神经根后的临床和放射学结果以及 C2 神经痛的发生率。50 名患者(22 名男性和 28 名女性)接受了完全切除 C2 神经根神经节的手术(Ex 组),51 名患者(30 名男性和 21 名女性)接受了保留 C2 神经根的手术(No 组)。否组的手术时间明显更短(p = 0.001)。两组的融合率都很高,组间无差异(p = 1.0)。Ex 组中需要从髂嵴进行自体移植(p = 0.001)以及术后使用硬颈圈固定(p < 0.001)的患者较少。此外,Ex 组患者术后活动更快(p = 0.49)。总体而言,两组的并发症发生率相似,但 Ex 组的主要医疗并发症较少(16% 对 31%)。结论在颅颈交界处后路器械融合术中切除C2神经根神经节是安全的,很少导致C2神经病变。该技术可减少术后并发症的发生几率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Safety and efficacy of the new modified technique for c2 nerve root resection in 3d fluoroscopy navigated instrumentation in the cranio-cervical junction

Safety and efficacy of the new modified technique for c2 nerve root resection in 3d fluoroscopy navigated instrumentation in the cranio-cervical junction

Purpose

Instrumentation of the C1 vertebra requires either mobilization or transection of the C2 nerve root. This study investigates clinical and radiological outcomes and incidences of C2 neuropathic pain after posterior instrumented fusion in the cranio-cervical junction with or without division of the C2 nerve roots.

Methods

This retrospective study compared two cohorts of patients who underwent instrumented fusion in the cranio-cervical junction. Fifty patients (22 males and 28 females) were operated with complete resection of C2 nerve root ganglion (Ex group), and fifty-one patients (30 men, 21 women) with C2 nerve roots preservation (No group).

Results

The incidence of postoperative C2 neuropathy was eight times lower in the Ex group compared to the No group that was statistical significant, p = 0.039. Surgical time was significantly shorter in the No group (p = 0.001). The fusion rates were very high for both groups, without difference between groups (p = 1.0). Autografting from the iliac crest (p = 0.001) as well as postoperative immobilisation with a hard collar (p < 0.001) were required in fewer patients in the Ex group. Also, patients in the Ex group were mobilised faster after surgery (p = 0.49). Overall, complication rates were similar between groups, but the Ex group demonstrated fewer major medical complications (16% vs 31%). Male sex and iliac bone harvesting demonstrated significantly higher OR for development of postoperative complications (p = 0.023 and p = 0.034 respectively) and postoperative mobilization demonstrated significant higher OR for development of postoperative major complications (p = 0.042).

Conclusions

Resection of the C2 nerve root ganglion during posterior instrumented fusion of the cranio-cervical junction is safe and rarely leads to C2 neuropathy. The technique tends to mitigate the odds of developing postoperative complications.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Neurochirurgica
Acta Neurochirurgica 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
4.20%
发文量
342
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The journal "Acta Neurochirurgica" publishes only original papers useful both to research and clinical work. Papers should deal with clinical neurosurgery - diagnosis and diagnostic techniques, operative surgery and results, postoperative treatment - or with research work in neuroscience if the underlying questions or the results are of neurosurgical interest. Reports on congresses are given in brief accounts. As official organ of the European Association of Neurosurgical Societies the journal publishes all announcements of the E.A.N.S. and reports on the activities of its member societies. Only contributions written in English will be accepted.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信