利用哨兵-2 数据估算多个生长阶段的水稻叶面积指数:对不同检索算法的评估

IF 4.5 1区 农林科学 Q1 AGRONOMY
Tongzhou Wu , Zhewei Zhang , Qi Wang , Wenjie Jin , Ke Meng , Cong Wang , Gaofei Yin , Baodong Xu , Zhihua Shi
{"title":"利用哨兵-2 数据估算多个生长阶段的水稻叶面积指数:对不同检索算法的评估","authors":"Tongzhou Wu ,&nbsp;Zhewei Zhang ,&nbsp;Qi Wang ,&nbsp;Wenjie Jin ,&nbsp;Ke Meng ,&nbsp;Cong Wang ,&nbsp;Gaofei Yin ,&nbsp;Baodong Xu ,&nbsp;Zhihua Shi","doi":"10.1016/j.eja.2024.127362","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Leaf area index (LAI), which is closely related to canopy physiological processes such as photosynthesis and water utilization, serves as an important biophysical parameter for monitoring rice (<em>Oryza sativa</em> L.) growth. However, due to significant variations in the water-soil mixed background during the rice growing season, the optimal LAI retrieval method for rice throughout the whole period remains unclear. Here, different LAI retrieval methods, categorized into vegetation index (VI)-, look-up table (LUT)- and machine learning (ML)-based groups, were evaluated for rice at multiple growth stages using Sentinel-2 images. Particularly, the performance of rice LAI derived from the optimal retrieval model was comprehensively analyzed to understand factors influencing LAI estimation during different growth stages. Results suggested that the Gaussian Process Regression (GPR) in the ML-based group achieved the best performance for rice LAI estimation in the whole growth period (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.75, RMSE = 0.60, RRMSE = 15.81 %), followed by the normalized difference VI (NDVI) in the VI-based group (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.74, RMSE = 0.61, RRMSE = 15.98 %) and the cost function K(x)=log(x)+1/x in the LUT-based group (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.70, RMSE = 0.69, RRMSE = 18.09 %). Notably, although the VI-based LAI retrieval method incorporated ground measurements to build empirical LAI-VI relationships, a single VI with parametric regression cannot well capture variations in rice LAI across growth stages compared to the ML-based method using simulation dataset from the physical model. The optimal ML-based method also exhibited better performance in rice LAI estimation than similar studies, with R<sup>2</sup> increasing by 0.14 and RMSE decreasing by 0.18. Furthermore, based on ground LAI measurements, the water-soil mixed background is a primary influencing factor for rice LAI estimation in the tillering, jointing, and booting stages (RMSE: 0.39–0.79), whereas the saturation effects should be considered in the full heading stage (RMSE = 0.68). Overall, this study indicates that the GPR-based retrieval strategy is the optimal method for generating rice LAI datasets over the whole growth period, providing valuable reference for precision agriculture application such as field irrigation, fertilization management, and yield estimation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51045,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Agronomy","volume":"161 ","pages":"Article 127362"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Estimating rice leaf area index at multiple growth stages with Sentinel-2 data: An evaluation of different retrieval algorithms\",\"authors\":\"Tongzhou Wu ,&nbsp;Zhewei Zhang ,&nbsp;Qi Wang ,&nbsp;Wenjie Jin ,&nbsp;Ke Meng ,&nbsp;Cong Wang ,&nbsp;Gaofei Yin ,&nbsp;Baodong Xu ,&nbsp;Zhihua Shi\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.eja.2024.127362\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Leaf area index (LAI), which is closely related to canopy physiological processes such as photosynthesis and water utilization, serves as an important biophysical parameter for monitoring rice (<em>Oryza sativa</em> L.) growth. However, due to significant variations in the water-soil mixed background during the rice growing season, the optimal LAI retrieval method for rice throughout the whole period remains unclear. Here, different LAI retrieval methods, categorized into vegetation index (VI)-, look-up table (LUT)- and machine learning (ML)-based groups, were evaluated for rice at multiple growth stages using Sentinel-2 images. Particularly, the performance of rice LAI derived from the optimal retrieval model was comprehensively analyzed to understand factors influencing LAI estimation during different growth stages. Results suggested that the Gaussian Process Regression (GPR) in the ML-based group achieved the best performance for rice LAI estimation in the whole growth period (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.75, RMSE = 0.60, RRMSE = 15.81 %), followed by the normalized difference VI (NDVI) in the VI-based group (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.74, RMSE = 0.61, RRMSE = 15.98 %) and the cost function K(x)=log(x)+1/x in the LUT-based group (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.70, RMSE = 0.69, RRMSE = 18.09 %). Notably, although the VI-based LAI retrieval method incorporated ground measurements to build empirical LAI-VI relationships, a single VI with parametric regression cannot well capture variations in rice LAI across growth stages compared to the ML-based method using simulation dataset from the physical model. The optimal ML-based method also exhibited better performance in rice LAI estimation than similar studies, with R<sup>2</sup> increasing by 0.14 and RMSE decreasing by 0.18. Furthermore, based on ground LAI measurements, the water-soil mixed background is a primary influencing factor for rice LAI estimation in the tillering, jointing, and booting stages (RMSE: 0.39–0.79), whereas the saturation effects should be considered in the full heading stage (RMSE = 0.68). Overall, this study indicates that the GPR-based retrieval strategy is the optimal method for generating rice LAI datasets over the whole growth period, providing valuable reference for precision agriculture application such as field irrigation, fertilization management, and yield estimation.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51045,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Agronomy\",\"volume\":\"161 \",\"pages\":\"Article 127362\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Agronomy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1161030124002831\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRONOMY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Agronomy","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1161030124002831","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

叶面积指数(LAI)与光合作用和水分利用等冠层生理过程密切相关,是监测水稻(Oryza sativa L.)生长的重要生物物理参数。然而,由于水稻生长期水土混合背景的显著变化,水稻整个生长期的最佳 LAI 提取方法仍不明确。在此,利用哨兵-2 图像对水稻多个生长阶段的不同 LAI 检索方法进行了评估,这些方法分为植被指数(VI)、查找表(LUT)和基于机器学习(ML)的几组。特别是全面分析了最优检索模型得出的水稻 LAI 性能,以了解影响不同生长阶段 LAI 估算的因素。结果表明,基于 ML 的高斯过程回归(GPR)对水稻整个生长期的 LAI 估计性能最好(R2 = 0.75,RMSE = 0.60,RRMSE = 15.81 %),其次是基于 VI 组的归一化差异植被指数(NDVI)(R2 = 0.74,RMSE = 0.61,RRMSE = 15.98 %)和基于 LUT 组的成本函数 K(x)=log(x)+1/x(R2 = 0.70,RMSE = 0.69,RRMSE = 18.09 %)。值得注意的是,虽然基于 VI 的 LAI 检索方法结合了地面测量来建立经验 LAI-VI 关系,但与使用物理模型模拟数据集的基于 ML 的方法相比,使用参数回归的单一 VI 无法很好地捕捉水稻 LAI 在不同生长阶段的变化。与同类研究相比,基于 ML 的最优方法在水稻 LAI 估算方面也表现出更好的性能,R2 增加了 0.14,RMSE 减少了 0.18。此外,根据地面 LAI 测量结果,水土混合背景是分蘖期、拔节期和抽穗期水稻 LAI 估算的主要影响因素(RMSE:0.39-0.79),而饱和效应应在全穗期考虑(RMSE = 0.68)。总之,本研究表明,基于 GPR 的检索策略是生成水稻整个生长期 LAI 数据集的最佳方法,可为田间灌溉、施肥管理和产量估算等精准农业应用提供有价值的参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Estimating rice leaf area index at multiple growth stages with Sentinel-2 data: An evaluation of different retrieval algorithms

Leaf area index (LAI), which is closely related to canopy physiological processes such as photosynthesis and water utilization, serves as an important biophysical parameter for monitoring rice (Oryza sativa L.) growth. However, due to significant variations in the water-soil mixed background during the rice growing season, the optimal LAI retrieval method for rice throughout the whole period remains unclear. Here, different LAI retrieval methods, categorized into vegetation index (VI)-, look-up table (LUT)- and machine learning (ML)-based groups, were evaluated for rice at multiple growth stages using Sentinel-2 images. Particularly, the performance of rice LAI derived from the optimal retrieval model was comprehensively analyzed to understand factors influencing LAI estimation during different growth stages. Results suggested that the Gaussian Process Regression (GPR) in the ML-based group achieved the best performance for rice LAI estimation in the whole growth period (R2 = 0.75, RMSE = 0.60, RRMSE = 15.81 %), followed by the normalized difference VI (NDVI) in the VI-based group (R2 = 0.74, RMSE = 0.61, RRMSE = 15.98 %) and the cost function K(x)=log(x)+1/x in the LUT-based group (R2 = 0.70, RMSE = 0.69, RRMSE = 18.09 %). Notably, although the VI-based LAI retrieval method incorporated ground measurements to build empirical LAI-VI relationships, a single VI with parametric regression cannot well capture variations in rice LAI across growth stages compared to the ML-based method using simulation dataset from the physical model. The optimal ML-based method also exhibited better performance in rice LAI estimation than similar studies, with R2 increasing by 0.14 and RMSE decreasing by 0.18. Furthermore, based on ground LAI measurements, the water-soil mixed background is a primary influencing factor for rice LAI estimation in the tillering, jointing, and booting stages (RMSE: 0.39–0.79), whereas the saturation effects should be considered in the full heading stage (RMSE = 0.68). Overall, this study indicates that the GPR-based retrieval strategy is the optimal method for generating rice LAI datasets over the whole growth period, providing valuable reference for precision agriculture application such as field irrigation, fertilization management, and yield estimation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
European Journal of Agronomy
European Journal of Agronomy 农林科学-农艺学
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
187
审稿时长
4.5 months
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Agronomy, the official journal of the European Society for Agronomy, publishes original research papers reporting experimental and theoretical contributions to field-based agronomy and crop science. The journal will consider research at the field level for agricultural, horticultural and tree crops, that uses comprehensive and explanatory approaches. The EJA covers the following topics: crop physiology crop production and management including irrigation, fertilization and soil management agroclimatology and modelling plant-soil relationships crop quality and post-harvest physiology farming and cropping systems agroecosystems and the environment crop-weed interactions and management organic farming horticultural crops papers from the European Society for Agronomy bi-annual meetings In determining the suitability of submitted articles for publication, particular scrutiny is placed on the degree of novelty and significance of the research and the extent to which it adds to existing knowledge in agronomy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信