虚拟评估下肢假肢使用者的功能活动能力:一项探索性研究

IF 1.9 Q2 REHABILITATION
Oluwagbemiga DadeMatthews MD, PhD , Jaimie A. Roper PhD , Adan Vazquez MS , David Shannon PhD , JoEllen M. Sefton MS, PhD
{"title":"虚拟评估下肢假肢使用者的功能活动能力:一项探索性研究","authors":"Oluwagbemiga DadeMatthews MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Jaimie A. Roper PhD ,&nbsp;Adan Vazquez MS ,&nbsp;David Shannon PhD ,&nbsp;JoEllen M. Sefton MS, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.arrct.2024.100355","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To investigate the relationship between patient perception of lower extremity function and a home-based virtual clinician assessment of mobility in lower limb prosthesis clients.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>Descriptive observational study using a clinician-administered functional mobility survey and timed Up and Go test to assess lower extremity function under supervision.</p></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><p>Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act-compliant online virtual platform.</p></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><p>Twelve lower limb loss clients currently using prostheses, aged ≥19 years, not pregnant, and with no stroke, seizure disorder, or cancer.</p></div><div><h3>Interventions</h3><p>Not applicable.</p></div><div><h3>Main Outcome Measures</h3><p>Main outcomes were mobility survey scores and mean timed Up and Go duration.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Most participants reported significant ease of completing basic indoor ambulation and toileting tasks (66%-75%) and significant difficulty in running or prolonged ambulation activities (83%) requiring use of lower limb prosthesis. Timed Up and Go test was faster (11.0±2.9 s) than the reference range for transtibial prosthesis users and negatively associated with self-reported lower extremity functional status (<em>r</em>=−.70, <em>P</em>=.02).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Self-reported movement with lower limb prostheses at home and evaluation of mobility via a virtual platform is a feasible assessment modality that may reduce the frequency of therapy visits, defray some rehabilitation costs, and minimize the travel burden to distant prosthetic clinics.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72291,"journal":{"name":"Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation","volume":"6 3","pages":"Article 100355"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590109524000533/pdfft?md5=8999de8e7f0138c6685f4a4a0acbc4cf&pid=1-s2.0-S2590109524000533-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Virtual Assessment of Functional Mobility in Lower Extremity Prosthesis Clients: An Exploratory Study\",\"authors\":\"Oluwagbemiga DadeMatthews MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Jaimie A. Roper PhD ,&nbsp;Adan Vazquez MS ,&nbsp;David Shannon PhD ,&nbsp;JoEllen M. Sefton MS, PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.arrct.2024.100355\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To investigate the relationship between patient perception of lower extremity function and a home-based virtual clinician assessment of mobility in lower limb prosthesis clients.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>Descriptive observational study using a clinician-administered functional mobility survey and timed Up and Go test to assess lower extremity function under supervision.</p></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><p>Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act-compliant online virtual platform.</p></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><p>Twelve lower limb loss clients currently using prostheses, aged ≥19 years, not pregnant, and with no stroke, seizure disorder, or cancer.</p></div><div><h3>Interventions</h3><p>Not applicable.</p></div><div><h3>Main Outcome Measures</h3><p>Main outcomes were mobility survey scores and mean timed Up and Go duration.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Most participants reported significant ease of completing basic indoor ambulation and toileting tasks (66%-75%) and significant difficulty in running or prolonged ambulation activities (83%) requiring use of lower limb prosthesis. Timed Up and Go test was faster (11.0±2.9 s) than the reference range for transtibial prosthesis users and negatively associated with self-reported lower extremity functional status (<em>r</em>=−.70, <em>P</em>=.02).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Self-reported movement with lower limb prostheses at home and evaluation of mobility via a virtual platform is a feasible assessment modality that may reduce the frequency of therapy visits, defray some rehabilitation costs, and minimize the travel burden to distant prosthetic clinics.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72291,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation\",\"volume\":\"6 3\",\"pages\":\"Article 100355\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590109524000533/pdfft?md5=8999de8e7f0138c6685f4a4a0acbc4cf&pid=1-s2.0-S2590109524000533-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590109524000533\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590109524000533","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目标研究患者对下肢功能的感知与基于家庭的虚拟临床医生对下肢假肢使用者活动能力评估之间的关系.设计描述性观察研究,使用临床医生管理的功能活动能力调查和计时 "向上走 "测试,在监督下评估下肢功能.设置符合《健康保险可携性和责任法案》的在线虚拟平台.干预措施不适用。主要结果测量主要结果为活动能力调查得分和平均计时 "向上和向前走 "持续时间。结果大多数参与者表示完成基本的室内行走和如厕任务非常容易(66%-75%),而需要使用下肢假肢的跑步或长时间行走活动则非常困难(83%)。结论自我报告在家中使用下肢假肢的活动情况,并通过虚拟平台对活动能力进行评估是一种可行的评估方式,它可以减少治疗次数,降低部分康复费用,并最大限度地减轻前往遥远的假肢诊所的旅行负担。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Virtual Assessment of Functional Mobility in Lower Extremity Prosthesis Clients: An Exploratory Study

Objective

To investigate the relationship between patient perception of lower extremity function and a home-based virtual clinician assessment of mobility in lower limb prosthesis clients.

Design

Descriptive observational study using a clinician-administered functional mobility survey and timed Up and Go test to assess lower extremity function under supervision.

Setting

Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act-compliant online virtual platform.

Participants

Twelve lower limb loss clients currently using prostheses, aged ≥19 years, not pregnant, and with no stroke, seizure disorder, or cancer.

Interventions

Not applicable.

Main Outcome Measures

Main outcomes were mobility survey scores and mean timed Up and Go duration.

Results

Most participants reported significant ease of completing basic indoor ambulation and toileting tasks (66%-75%) and significant difficulty in running or prolonged ambulation activities (83%) requiring use of lower limb prosthesis. Timed Up and Go test was faster (11.0±2.9 s) than the reference range for transtibial prosthesis users and negatively associated with self-reported lower extremity functional status (r=−.70, P=.02).

Conclusions

Self-reported movement with lower limb prostheses at home and evaluation of mobility via a virtual platform is a feasible assessment modality that may reduce the frequency of therapy visits, defray some rehabilitation costs, and minimize the travel burden to distant prosthetic clinics.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信