无人机还是卫星?如何在人工针叶幼林地上生物量估算的效率和精度之间找到平衡?

IF 7.6 Q1 REMOTE SENSING
Zefu Tao , Lubei Yi , Anming Bao , Wenqiang Xu , Zhengyu Wang , Shimei Xiong , Hu Bing
{"title":"无人机还是卫星?如何在人工针叶幼林地上生物量估算的效率和精度之间找到平衡?","authors":"Zefu Tao ,&nbsp;Lubei Yi ,&nbsp;Anming Bao ,&nbsp;Wenqiang Xu ,&nbsp;Zhengyu Wang ,&nbsp;Shimei Xiong ,&nbsp;Hu Bing","doi":"10.1016/j.jag.2024.104173","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The accurate estimation of Above Ground Biomass (AGB) is the basis for plantation forest carbon trading. This study focused on <em>Picea crassifolia</em> artificial plantations, extracting individual tree crown diameters and heights using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAV) data and calculating the individual tree biomass using allometric growth equations. These results were then used to train a satellite image AGB prediction model. In additional, satellite images were resampled to different resolutions to assess the impact of satellite image resolution on model the accuracy. Finally, the model with the highest accuracy among the deep learning algorithms was selected to predicts the AGB within the <em>P. crassifolia</em> plantation forest. The results indicated that the accuracy of single tree crown diameters extracted from <em>P. crassifolia</em> point clouds significantly surpassed those extracted from general point clouds and Crown Height Model (CHM), while the accuracy of the heights extracted from all three sources was similar; RepLKNet outperformed GoogLeNet and ResNet in identifying plantation forest; random forest slightly outperformed XGBoost in the capability of AGB prediction, while the accuracy of the AGB prediction models initially increasd and then decreasd with satellite image resolution, reaching the highest accuracy at a resolution of 50 m. This indicates that the optimal satellite image resolution for estimating the AGB in the study area was affected by scale effects of 50 m. Compared with the combination of satellite data and manual field measurements, the concurrent use of UAVs and satellites offers significant advantages in terms of efficiency and accuracy. UAVs can replace manual sampling for carbon sequestration transactions for plantations.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":73423,"journal":{"name":"International journal of applied earth observation and geoinformation : ITC journal","volume":"134 ","pages":"Article 104173"},"PeriodicalIF":7.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1569843224005296/pdfft?md5=41b69990809d35b3a12aa185bb577ac9&pid=1-s2.0-S1569843224005296-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"UAV or satellites? How to find the balance between efficiency and accuracy in above ground biomass estimation of artificial young coniferous forest?\",\"authors\":\"Zefu Tao ,&nbsp;Lubei Yi ,&nbsp;Anming Bao ,&nbsp;Wenqiang Xu ,&nbsp;Zhengyu Wang ,&nbsp;Shimei Xiong ,&nbsp;Hu Bing\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jag.2024.104173\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The accurate estimation of Above Ground Biomass (AGB) is the basis for plantation forest carbon trading. This study focused on <em>Picea crassifolia</em> artificial plantations, extracting individual tree crown diameters and heights using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAV) data and calculating the individual tree biomass using allometric growth equations. These results were then used to train a satellite image AGB prediction model. In additional, satellite images were resampled to different resolutions to assess the impact of satellite image resolution on model the accuracy. Finally, the model with the highest accuracy among the deep learning algorithms was selected to predicts the AGB within the <em>P. crassifolia</em> plantation forest. The results indicated that the accuracy of single tree crown diameters extracted from <em>P. crassifolia</em> point clouds significantly surpassed those extracted from general point clouds and Crown Height Model (CHM), while the accuracy of the heights extracted from all three sources was similar; RepLKNet outperformed GoogLeNet and ResNet in identifying plantation forest; random forest slightly outperformed XGBoost in the capability of AGB prediction, while the accuracy of the AGB prediction models initially increasd and then decreasd with satellite image resolution, reaching the highest accuracy at a resolution of 50 m. This indicates that the optimal satellite image resolution for estimating the AGB in the study area was affected by scale effects of 50 m. Compared with the combination of satellite data and manual field measurements, the concurrent use of UAVs and satellites offers significant advantages in terms of efficiency and accuracy. UAVs can replace manual sampling for carbon sequestration transactions for plantations.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73423,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of applied earth observation and geoinformation : ITC journal\",\"volume\":\"134 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104173\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1569843224005296/pdfft?md5=41b69990809d35b3a12aa185bb577ac9&pid=1-s2.0-S1569843224005296-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of applied earth observation and geoinformation : ITC journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1569843224005296\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"REMOTE SENSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of applied earth observation and geoinformation : ITC journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1569843224005296","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REMOTE SENSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

准确估算地上生物量(AGB)是人工林碳交易的基础。这项研究主要针对人工种植的红豆杉(Picea crassifolia),利用无人机(UAV)数据提取单棵树的树冠直径和高度,并利用异速生长方程计算单棵树的生物量。这些结果随后被用于训练卫星图像 AGB 预测模型。此外,卫星图像被重新采样到不同的分辨率,以评估卫星图像分辨率对模型准确性的影响。最后,选择了深度学习算法中准确率最高的模型来预测 P. crassifolia 人工林中的 AGB。结果表明,从 P. crassolia 点云中提取的单棵树冠径的准确度明显超过了从卫星云中提取的单棵树冠径的准确度。在人工林识别方面,RepLKNet优于GoogLeNet和ResNet;在AGB预测能力方面,随机森林略优于XGBoost,而AGB预测模型的准确率随卫星图像分辨率的变化先增大后减小,在分辨率为50 m时准确率最高。与卫星数据和人工实地测量相结合的方法相比,同时使用无人机和卫星在效率和精度方面具有显著优势。无人机可以取代人工采样,用于人工林的碳封存交易。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
UAV or satellites? How to find the balance between efficiency and accuracy in above ground biomass estimation of artificial young coniferous forest?

The accurate estimation of Above Ground Biomass (AGB) is the basis for plantation forest carbon trading. This study focused on Picea crassifolia artificial plantations, extracting individual tree crown diameters and heights using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAV) data and calculating the individual tree biomass using allometric growth equations. These results were then used to train a satellite image AGB prediction model. In additional, satellite images were resampled to different resolutions to assess the impact of satellite image resolution on model the accuracy. Finally, the model with the highest accuracy among the deep learning algorithms was selected to predicts the AGB within the P. crassifolia plantation forest. The results indicated that the accuracy of single tree crown diameters extracted from P. crassifolia point clouds significantly surpassed those extracted from general point clouds and Crown Height Model (CHM), while the accuracy of the heights extracted from all three sources was similar; RepLKNet outperformed GoogLeNet and ResNet in identifying plantation forest; random forest slightly outperformed XGBoost in the capability of AGB prediction, while the accuracy of the AGB prediction models initially increasd and then decreasd with satellite image resolution, reaching the highest accuracy at a resolution of 50 m. This indicates that the optimal satellite image resolution for estimating the AGB in the study area was affected by scale effects of 50 m. Compared with the combination of satellite data and manual field measurements, the concurrent use of UAVs and satellites offers significant advantages in terms of efficiency and accuracy. UAVs can replace manual sampling for carbon sequestration transactions for plantations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International journal of applied earth observation and geoinformation : ITC journal
International journal of applied earth observation and geoinformation : ITC journal Global and Planetary Change, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, Earth-Surface Processes, Computers in Earth Sciences
CiteScore
12.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
77 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation publishes original papers that utilize earth observation data for natural resource and environmental inventory and management. These data primarily originate from remote sensing platforms, including satellites and aircraft, supplemented by surface and subsurface measurements. Addressing natural resources such as forests, agricultural land, soils, and water, as well as environmental concerns like biodiversity, land degradation, and hazards, the journal explores conceptual and data-driven approaches. It covers geoinformation themes like capturing, databasing, visualization, interpretation, data quality, and spatial uncertainty.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信