重症监护转运中的插管前推注式血管加压剂

Q3 Nursing
Alissa M. Bates MD , Alyson M. Esteves PharmD, BCPS, BCCCP , Kalle J. Fjeld MD , Ryan J. Ding BS , Jeremy M. Singleton RN, CFRN , Matthew A. Roginski MD, MPH
{"title":"重症监护转运中的插管前推注式血管加压剂","authors":"Alissa M. Bates MD ,&nbsp;Alyson M. Esteves PharmD, BCPS, BCCCP ,&nbsp;Kalle J. Fjeld MD ,&nbsp;Ryan J. Ding BS ,&nbsp;Jeremy M. Singleton RN, CFRN ,&nbsp;Matthew A. Roginski MD, MPH","doi":"10.1016/j.amj.2024.05.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Push-dose vasopressors are commonly administered to attenuate peri-intubation hypotension. The aim of this study was to describe the current use of push-dose vasopressors in critical care transport.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This was a retrospective chart review of adult patients (≥ 18 years) intubated between January 2017 and May 2023 who received push-dose vasopressors. The outcomes were incidence of push-dose vasopressor administration and the frequency of initiation or an increase in continuous vasopressor infusion.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Of the 334 patients intubated during this period, 49 (14.7%) received push-dose vasopressors in the peri-intubation period. The mean preintubation shock index was 1.1 ± 0.5. Of those who received push-dose vasopressors, 34 (69.4%) received multiple push doses; the mean number of administrations was 2.5 ± 1.9. Most patients had persistent or recurrent hypotension (n = 39, 79.6%). Fifteen (30.6%) were started on a continuous vasopressor infusion, and 3 (11.1%) had an increase in an existing infusion postintubation.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Although push-dose vasopressors are convenient and appropriate in many settings, they inadequately address hypotension in critically ill patients with underlying shock. Further investigation is required to better elucidate the role of peri-intubation push-dose and continuous vasopressors in the critical care transport setting.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":35737,"journal":{"name":"Air Medical Journal","volume":"43 5","pages":"Pages 412-415"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Peri-Intubation Push-Dose Vasopressors in Critical Care Transport\",\"authors\":\"Alissa M. Bates MD ,&nbsp;Alyson M. Esteves PharmD, BCPS, BCCCP ,&nbsp;Kalle J. Fjeld MD ,&nbsp;Ryan J. Ding BS ,&nbsp;Jeremy M. Singleton RN, CFRN ,&nbsp;Matthew A. Roginski MD, MPH\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.amj.2024.05.008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Push-dose vasopressors are commonly administered to attenuate peri-intubation hypotension. The aim of this study was to describe the current use of push-dose vasopressors in critical care transport.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This was a retrospective chart review of adult patients (≥ 18 years) intubated between January 2017 and May 2023 who received push-dose vasopressors. The outcomes were incidence of push-dose vasopressor administration and the frequency of initiation or an increase in continuous vasopressor infusion.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Of the 334 patients intubated during this period, 49 (14.7%) received push-dose vasopressors in the peri-intubation period. The mean preintubation shock index was 1.1 ± 0.5. Of those who received push-dose vasopressors, 34 (69.4%) received multiple push doses; the mean number of administrations was 2.5 ± 1.9. Most patients had persistent or recurrent hypotension (n = 39, 79.6%). Fifteen (30.6%) were started on a continuous vasopressor infusion, and 3 (11.1%) had an increase in an existing infusion postintubation.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Although push-dose vasopressors are convenient and appropriate in many settings, they inadequately address hypotension in critically ill patients with underlying shock. Further investigation is required to better elucidate the role of peri-intubation push-dose and continuous vasopressors in the critical care transport setting.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":35737,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Air Medical Journal\",\"volume\":\"43 5\",\"pages\":\"Pages 412-415\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Air Medical Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1067991X24001056\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Nursing\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Air Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1067991X24001056","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的推注式血管加压药通常用于缓解插管周围低血压。本研究旨在描述目前在重症监护转运中使用推注式血管加压药的情况。方法这是一项回顾性病历审查,对象为 2017 年 1 月至 2023 年 5 月期间接受推注式血管加压药的插管成人患者(≥ 18 岁)。结果 在此期间插管的 334 名患者中,有 49 人(14.7%)在插管前接受了推注式血管加压药。插管前休克指数平均为 1.1 ± 0.5。在接受推注式血管加压药的患者中,34 人(69.4%)接受了多次推注;平均推注次数为 2.5 ± 1.9。大多数患者有持续性或复发性低血压(39 人,占 79.6%)。15例(30.6%)患者开始持续输注血管加压素,3例(11.1%)患者在插管后增加了现有输注。为了更好地阐明插管周围推注式和持续性血管加压药在重症监护转运环境中的作用,还需要进一步的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Peri-Intubation Push-Dose Vasopressors in Critical Care Transport

Objective

Push-dose vasopressors are commonly administered to attenuate peri-intubation hypotension. The aim of this study was to describe the current use of push-dose vasopressors in critical care transport.

Methods

This was a retrospective chart review of adult patients (≥ 18 years) intubated between January 2017 and May 2023 who received push-dose vasopressors. The outcomes were incidence of push-dose vasopressor administration and the frequency of initiation or an increase in continuous vasopressor infusion.

Results

Of the 334 patients intubated during this period, 49 (14.7%) received push-dose vasopressors in the peri-intubation period. The mean preintubation shock index was 1.1 ± 0.5. Of those who received push-dose vasopressors, 34 (69.4%) received multiple push doses; the mean number of administrations was 2.5 ± 1.9. Most patients had persistent or recurrent hypotension (n = 39, 79.6%). Fifteen (30.6%) were started on a continuous vasopressor infusion, and 3 (11.1%) had an increase in an existing infusion postintubation.

Conclusion

Although push-dose vasopressors are convenient and appropriate in many settings, they inadequately address hypotension in critically ill patients with underlying shock. Further investigation is required to better elucidate the role of peri-intubation push-dose and continuous vasopressors in the critical care transport setting.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Air Medical Journal
Air Medical Journal Nursing-Emergency Nursing
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
112
审稿时长
69 days
期刊介绍: Air Medical Journal is the official journal of the five leading air medical transport associations in the United States. AMJ is the premier provider of information for the medical transport industry, addressing the unique concerns of medical transport physicians, nurses, pilots, paramedics, emergency medical technicians, communication specialists, and program administrators. The journal contains practical how-to articles, debates on controversial industry issues, legislative updates, case studies, and peer-reviewed original research articles covering all aspects of the medical transport profession.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信