体内胎盘 T2∗ 测量的单切片评估与多切片评估

IF 3 2区 医学 Q2 DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY
Morteza Pishghadam , Julius S. Ngwa , Yao Wu , Kushal Kapse , Lylach Haizler-Cohen , Dorothy Bulas , Catherine Limperopoulos , Nickie Niforatos Andescavage
{"title":"体内胎盘 T2∗ 测量的单切片评估与多切片评估","authors":"Morteza Pishghadam ,&nbsp;Julius S. Ngwa ,&nbsp;Yao Wu ,&nbsp;Kushal Kapse ,&nbsp;Lylach Haizler-Cohen ,&nbsp;Dorothy Bulas ,&nbsp;Catherine Limperopoulos ,&nbsp;Nickie Niforatos Andescavage","doi":"10.1016/j.placenta.2024.09.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Placental health is vital for maternal and fetal well-being, and placental T2∗ has been suggested to identify in vivo placental dysfunction prior to delivery. However, ideal regions of interest to best inform functional assessments of the placenta remain unknown. The aim of this study is to compare global and slice-wise measures of in-vivo placental T2∗ assessments.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This prospective study recruited pregnant people with singleton pregnancies between December 2017 and February 2022.3D multi-echo RF-spoiled gradient echo sequences were acquired, and placental T2∗ values were derived from global and slice-wise approaches. Statistical analyses included Pearson correlation coefficients, concordance correlation coefficients (CCC), intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC), and Bland-Altman analyses.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Of 115 participants (mean gestational age, 29.25 ± 5.05 weeks), 68 were healthy controls, and 47 were high-risk pregnancies. Global and slice-wise placental T2∗ assessments for the entire cohort showed no significant difference nor for individual subgroups (healthy controls or high-risk). Pearson correlation values ranged between 0.88 and 0.99 for mean global and slice-wise placental T2∗. CCC analyses ranged from 0.88 to 0.99 for mean T2∗, and ICC analyses ranged between 0.88 and 0.99 for mean T2∗, showing a strong agreement between measurements. Bland-Altman analyses depicted T2∗ differences across coverage methods, and groups resided within the 95 % limits of agreement.</p></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><p>Single-slice placental assessments offer robust, comparable T2∗ values to global assessments, with the added benefit of reducing post-processing time and SAR exposure. This supports slice-wise approaches as valid alternatives for assessing placental health in various pregnancies.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":20203,"journal":{"name":"Placenta","volume":"156 ","pages":"Pages 92-97"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Single vs. multi-slice assessments of in vivo placental T2∗ measurements\",\"authors\":\"Morteza Pishghadam ,&nbsp;Julius S. Ngwa ,&nbsp;Yao Wu ,&nbsp;Kushal Kapse ,&nbsp;Lylach Haizler-Cohen ,&nbsp;Dorothy Bulas ,&nbsp;Catherine Limperopoulos ,&nbsp;Nickie Niforatos Andescavage\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.placenta.2024.09.006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Placental health is vital for maternal and fetal well-being, and placental T2∗ has been suggested to identify in vivo placental dysfunction prior to delivery. However, ideal regions of interest to best inform functional assessments of the placenta remain unknown. The aim of this study is to compare global and slice-wise measures of in-vivo placental T2∗ assessments.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This prospective study recruited pregnant people with singleton pregnancies between December 2017 and February 2022.3D multi-echo RF-spoiled gradient echo sequences were acquired, and placental T2∗ values were derived from global and slice-wise approaches. Statistical analyses included Pearson correlation coefficients, concordance correlation coefficients (CCC), intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC), and Bland-Altman analyses.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Of 115 participants (mean gestational age, 29.25 ± 5.05 weeks), 68 were healthy controls, and 47 were high-risk pregnancies. Global and slice-wise placental T2∗ assessments for the entire cohort showed no significant difference nor for individual subgroups (healthy controls or high-risk). Pearson correlation values ranged between 0.88 and 0.99 for mean global and slice-wise placental T2∗. CCC analyses ranged from 0.88 to 0.99 for mean T2∗, and ICC analyses ranged between 0.88 and 0.99 for mean T2∗, showing a strong agreement between measurements. Bland-Altman analyses depicted T2∗ differences across coverage methods, and groups resided within the 95 % limits of agreement.</p></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><p>Single-slice placental assessments offer robust, comparable T2∗ values to global assessments, with the added benefit of reducing post-processing time and SAR exposure. This supports slice-wise approaches as valid alternatives for assessing placental health in various pregnancies.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20203,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Placenta\",\"volume\":\"156 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 92-97\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Placenta\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0143400424006489\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Placenta","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0143400424006489","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

引言 胎盘健康对母体和胎儿的健康至关重要,胎盘 T2∗ 被认为可在分娩前识别体内胎盘功能障碍。然而,最能为胎盘功能评估提供信息的理想感兴趣区仍然未知。这项前瞻性研究招募了 2017 年 12 月至 2022 年 2 月期间单胎妊娠的孕妇,采集了三维多回波射频散射梯度回波序列,并通过全局和切片方法得出胎盘 T2∗值。统计分析包括皮尔逊相关系数(Pearson correlation coefficients)、一致性相关系数(conordance correlation coefficients,CCC)、类内相关系数(intraclass correlation coefficients,ICC)和Bland-Altman分析。对整个组群的胎盘 T2∗整体和切片评估结果显示,各亚组(健康对照组或高危妊娠组)之间无显著差异。胎盘整体和切片平均 T2∗ 的 Pearson 相关值介于 0.88 和 0.99 之间。平均 T2∗ 的 CCC 分析值介于 0.88 和 0.99 之间,平均 T2∗ 的 ICC 分析值介于 0.88 和 0.99 之间,显示测量结果之间具有很强的一致性。讨论单切片胎盘评估可提供可靠、与全局评估相当的 T2∗值,还能减少后处理时间和 SAR 暴露。这支持将切片法作为评估各种妊娠胎盘健康状况的有效替代方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Single vs. multi-slice assessments of in vivo placental T2∗ measurements

Introduction

Placental health is vital for maternal and fetal well-being, and placental T2∗ has been suggested to identify in vivo placental dysfunction prior to delivery. However, ideal regions of interest to best inform functional assessments of the placenta remain unknown. The aim of this study is to compare global and slice-wise measures of in-vivo placental T2∗ assessments.

Methods

This prospective study recruited pregnant people with singleton pregnancies between December 2017 and February 2022.3D multi-echo RF-spoiled gradient echo sequences were acquired, and placental T2∗ values were derived from global and slice-wise approaches. Statistical analyses included Pearson correlation coefficients, concordance correlation coefficients (CCC), intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC), and Bland-Altman analyses.

Results

Of 115 participants (mean gestational age, 29.25 ± 5.05 weeks), 68 were healthy controls, and 47 were high-risk pregnancies. Global and slice-wise placental T2∗ assessments for the entire cohort showed no significant difference nor for individual subgroups (healthy controls or high-risk). Pearson correlation values ranged between 0.88 and 0.99 for mean global and slice-wise placental T2∗. CCC analyses ranged from 0.88 to 0.99 for mean T2∗, and ICC analyses ranged between 0.88 and 0.99 for mean T2∗, showing a strong agreement between measurements. Bland-Altman analyses depicted T2∗ differences across coverage methods, and groups resided within the 95 % limits of agreement.

Discussion

Single-slice placental assessments offer robust, comparable T2∗ values to global assessments, with the added benefit of reducing post-processing time and SAR exposure. This supports slice-wise approaches as valid alternatives for assessing placental health in various pregnancies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Placenta
Placenta 医学-发育生物学
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
10.50%
发文量
391
审稿时长
78 days
期刊介绍: Placenta publishes high-quality original articles and invited topical reviews on all aspects of human and animal placentation, and the interactions between the mother, the placenta and fetal development. Topics covered include evolution, development, genetics and epigenetics, stem cells, metabolism, transport, immunology, pathology, pharmacology, cell and molecular biology, and developmental programming. The Editors welcome studies on implantation and the endometrium, comparative placentation, the uterine and umbilical circulations, the relationship between fetal and placental development, clinical aspects of altered placental development or function, the placental membranes, the influence of paternal factors on placental development or function, and the assessment of biomarkers of placental disorders.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信