数字工厂》评论档案导言:延续旷日持久的辩论

IF 0.8 2区 历史学 Q1 HISTORY
Görkem Akgöz, Aad Blok
{"title":"数字工厂》评论档案导言:延续旷日持久的辩论","authors":"Görkem Akgöz, Aad Blok","doi":"10.1017/s0020859024000385","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Theories about the impact of digital technology on society and the development of capitalism and debates about the influence of digital information technologies on the future of work have been abundant since the end of the twentieth century. Most of the academic debate has taken place outside labour history, leaving the actual effects of digital technologies on human work and labour relations often overlooked. Moritz Altenried's <jats:italic>The Digital Factory: The Human Labor of Automation</jats:italic> focuses precisely on these effects, and as such provides a good opportunity to engage with these debates from a labour history perspective. This Review Dossier includes four comments on Altenried's book, by Bridget Kenny, Nico Pizzolato, Görkem Akgöz, and Greg Downey, to which the author responds. The contributors focus on different aspects of <jats:italic>The Digital Factory</jats:italic> depending on their own perspective on recent developments in the digital economy in the larger context of global capitalism.","PeriodicalId":46254,"journal":{"name":"International Review of Social History","volume":"13 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Introduction to the Review Dossier on The Digital Factory: Continuing a Long-Standing Debate\",\"authors\":\"Görkem Akgöz, Aad Blok\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/s0020859024000385\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Theories about the impact of digital technology on society and the development of capitalism and debates about the influence of digital information technologies on the future of work have been abundant since the end of the twentieth century. Most of the academic debate has taken place outside labour history, leaving the actual effects of digital technologies on human work and labour relations often overlooked. Moritz Altenried's <jats:italic>The Digital Factory: The Human Labor of Automation</jats:italic> focuses precisely on these effects, and as such provides a good opportunity to engage with these debates from a labour history perspective. This Review Dossier includes four comments on Altenried's book, by Bridget Kenny, Nico Pizzolato, Görkem Akgöz, and Greg Downey, to which the author responds. The contributors focus on different aspects of <jats:italic>The Digital Factory</jats:italic> depending on their own perspective on recent developments in the digital economy in the larger context of global capitalism.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46254,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Review of Social History\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Review of Social History\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/s0020859024000385\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Review of Social History","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s0020859024000385","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

自二十世纪末以来,关于数字技术对社会和资本主义发展的影响的理论,以及关于数字信息技术对未来工作的影响的辩论层出不穷。大多数学术辩论都是在劳动史之外进行的,因此数字技术对人类工作和劳动关系的实际影响往往被忽视。莫里茨-阿尔滕里德(Moritz Altenried)的《数字工厂》(The Digital Factory:莫里茨-阿尔滕里德(Moritz Altenried)的《数字工厂:自动化的人类劳动》(The Digital Factory: The Human Labor of Automation)正是聚焦于这些影响,因此提供了一个从劳动史角度参与这些争论的好机会。本评论档案包括布里奇特-肯尼(Bridget Kenny)、尼科-皮佐拉托(Nico Pizzolato)、戈尔克姆-阿克廓兹(Görkem Akgöz)和格雷格-多尼(Greg Downey)对阿滕里德著作的四篇评论,作者对此做出了回应。撰稿人根据自己对全球资本主义大背景下数字经济最新发展的看法,重点讨论了《数字工厂》的不同方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Introduction to the Review Dossier on The Digital Factory: Continuing a Long-Standing Debate
Theories about the impact of digital technology on society and the development of capitalism and debates about the influence of digital information technologies on the future of work have been abundant since the end of the twentieth century. Most of the academic debate has taken place outside labour history, leaving the actual effects of digital technologies on human work and labour relations often overlooked. Moritz Altenried's The Digital Factory: The Human Labor of Automation focuses precisely on these effects, and as such provides a good opportunity to engage with these debates from a labour history perspective. This Review Dossier includes four comments on Altenried's book, by Bridget Kenny, Nico Pizzolato, Görkem Akgöz, and Greg Downey, to which the author responds. The contributors focus on different aspects of The Digital Factory depending on their own perspective on recent developments in the digital economy in the larger context of global capitalism.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
68
期刊介绍: International Review of Social History, is one of the leading journals in its field. Truly global in its scope, it focuses on research in social and labour history from a comparative and transnational perspective, both in the modern and in the early modern period, and across periods. The journal combines quality, depth and originality of its articles with an open eye for theoretical innovation and new insights and methods from within its field and from contiguous disciplines. Besides research articles, it features surveys of new themes and subject fields, a suggestions and debates section, review essays and book reviews. It is esteemed for its annotated bibliography of social history titles, and also publishes an annual supplement of specially commissioned essays on a current theme.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信