废物管理的可持续性评估:废物变能源案例中的社会视角探索性研究

IF 9.7 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL
{"title":"废物管理的可持续性评估:废物变能源案例中的社会视角探索性研究","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.143693","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In the present world, rapid industrialization and extensive use of resources have led to an unprecedented increase in waste volumes. Industries seeking to produce more to satisfy the upsurge demand while exploiting the potential provided by advancements in technology contribute to this. This situation is leading to fast-approaching expiration date for natural resources, which calls for immediate intervention, sustainable practices, and proper waste disposal strategies. As pillars to sustainability, not only the environmental and economic aspects should be considered, the social domain is also very important to take into account. For the particular case of the waste-to-energy (WtE) technologies, the social domain entails several concerns that have never been thoroughly and representatively appraised, a clear understanding of the reasons behind this being missing. Thus, the purpose of this work is to conduct a literature review on social assessments related to the thermal conversion of wastes. Then, distinct methodologies already used for the social aspects in other areas were compared to the achieved results to better frame them and potentially suggest a workflow for this type of assessment in the WtE sector. The aim is to identify and address knowledge gaps, in order to facilitate a comprehensive evaluation of the current context surrounding this controversial topic. The main findings indicate a lack of consistent reporting practices for social life cycle assessment (S-LCA) implementation, the UNEP/SETAC approach appearing as the most commonly used. Social concerns primarily focus on employment, human health, accessibility, safety, and odor-related issues. Knowledge gaps persist, including the need for a better understanding of the interrelation between dimensions, the absence of concise and binding legislation, low sector engagement, discrimination issues, inconsistency in sensitivity analysis, and a lack of objectivity. Based on the literature review, it can be concluded that while WtE techniques have the potential to contribute to a more sustainable and resilient society, there are social concerns that must be addressed. The review highlights the importance of conducting comprehensive social assessments in the context of thermal waste conversion. By filling knowledge gaps and considering the social implications of these techniques, a more informed evaluation can be conducted, leading to better decision-making and the development of more sustainable waste management strategies. This effort should be tightly connected to the sustainability efforts and goals in place, such as the ones preconized by the European Commission and the United Nations.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":349,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cleaner Production","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":9.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959652624031421/pdfft?md5=58568c2ab1e8564dba2167066a5df948&pid=1-s2.0-S0959652624031421-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sustainability assessment in waste management: An exploratory study of the social perspective in waste-to-energy cases\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.143693\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>In the present world, rapid industrialization and extensive use of resources have led to an unprecedented increase in waste volumes. Industries seeking to produce more to satisfy the upsurge demand while exploiting the potential provided by advancements in technology contribute to this. This situation is leading to fast-approaching expiration date for natural resources, which calls for immediate intervention, sustainable practices, and proper waste disposal strategies. As pillars to sustainability, not only the environmental and economic aspects should be considered, the social domain is also very important to take into account. For the particular case of the waste-to-energy (WtE) technologies, the social domain entails several concerns that have never been thoroughly and representatively appraised, a clear understanding of the reasons behind this being missing. Thus, the purpose of this work is to conduct a literature review on social assessments related to the thermal conversion of wastes. Then, distinct methodologies already used for the social aspects in other areas were compared to the achieved results to better frame them and potentially suggest a workflow for this type of assessment in the WtE sector. The aim is to identify and address knowledge gaps, in order to facilitate a comprehensive evaluation of the current context surrounding this controversial topic. The main findings indicate a lack of consistent reporting practices for social life cycle assessment (S-LCA) implementation, the UNEP/SETAC approach appearing as the most commonly used. Social concerns primarily focus on employment, human health, accessibility, safety, and odor-related issues. Knowledge gaps persist, including the need for a better understanding of the interrelation between dimensions, the absence of concise and binding legislation, low sector engagement, discrimination issues, inconsistency in sensitivity analysis, and a lack of objectivity. Based on the literature review, it can be concluded that while WtE techniques have the potential to contribute to a more sustainable and resilient society, there are social concerns that must be addressed. The review highlights the importance of conducting comprehensive social assessments in the context of thermal waste conversion. By filling knowledge gaps and considering the social implications of these techniques, a more informed evaluation can be conducted, leading to better decision-making and the development of more sustainable waste management strategies. This effort should be tightly connected to the sustainability efforts and goals in place, such as the ones preconized by the European Commission and the United Nations.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":349,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Cleaner Production\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959652624031421/pdfft?md5=58568c2ab1e8564dba2167066a5df948&pid=1-s2.0-S0959652624031421-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Cleaner Production\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959652624031421\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cleaner Production","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959652624031421","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

当今世界,快速的工业化和资源的广泛利用导致废物量空前增加。各行各业都在寻求生产更多的产品以满足激增的需求,同时利用技术进步所带来的潜力,这些都是造成这种情况的原因。这种情况导致自然资源的到期日迅速临近,因此需要立即采取干预措施、可持续的做法和适当的废物处理战略。作为可持续发展的支柱,不仅要考虑环境和经济方面,社会领域也非常重要。就废物变能源(WtE)技术的特殊情况而言,社会领域所涉及的一些问题从未进行过彻底和有代表性的评估,对其背后的原因也缺乏清晰的认识。因此,这项工作的目的是对与废物热转化相关的社会评估进行文献综述。然后,将其他领域已用于社会方面的不同方法与已取得的成果进行比较,以更好地确定这些方法的框架,并为 WtE 行业的此类评估提出潜在的工作流程建议。其目的是找出并解决知识差距,以促进对围绕这一有争议的主题的当前背景进行全面评估。主要研究结果表明,社会生命周期评估(S-LCA)的实施缺乏一致的报告实践,最常用的是联合国环境规划署/SETAC 方法。社会问题主要集中在就业、人类健康、无障碍环境、安全和气味相关问题上。知识差距依然存在,包括需要更好地了解各方面之间的相互关系、缺乏简明且具有约束力的立法、部门参与度低、歧视问题、敏感性分析不一致以及缺乏客观性。根据文献综述,可以得出这样的结论:虽然 WtE 技术有可能为建设一个更可持续和更具复原力的社会做出贡献,但也存在一些必须解决的社会问题。该综述强调了在热废物转化方面进行全面社会评估的重要性。通过填补知识空白并考虑这些技术的社会影响,可以进行更知情的评估,从而做出更好的决策并制定更可持续的废物管理战略。这项工作应与现有的可持续性工作和目标紧密联系起来,如欧盟委员会和联合国预先确定的目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Sustainability assessment in waste management: An exploratory study of the social perspective in waste-to-energy cases

In the present world, rapid industrialization and extensive use of resources have led to an unprecedented increase in waste volumes. Industries seeking to produce more to satisfy the upsurge demand while exploiting the potential provided by advancements in technology contribute to this. This situation is leading to fast-approaching expiration date for natural resources, which calls for immediate intervention, sustainable practices, and proper waste disposal strategies. As pillars to sustainability, not only the environmental and economic aspects should be considered, the social domain is also very important to take into account. For the particular case of the waste-to-energy (WtE) technologies, the social domain entails several concerns that have never been thoroughly and representatively appraised, a clear understanding of the reasons behind this being missing. Thus, the purpose of this work is to conduct a literature review on social assessments related to the thermal conversion of wastes. Then, distinct methodologies already used for the social aspects in other areas were compared to the achieved results to better frame them and potentially suggest a workflow for this type of assessment in the WtE sector. The aim is to identify and address knowledge gaps, in order to facilitate a comprehensive evaluation of the current context surrounding this controversial topic. The main findings indicate a lack of consistent reporting practices for social life cycle assessment (S-LCA) implementation, the UNEP/SETAC approach appearing as the most commonly used. Social concerns primarily focus on employment, human health, accessibility, safety, and odor-related issues. Knowledge gaps persist, including the need for a better understanding of the interrelation between dimensions, the absence of concise and binding legislation, low sector engagement, discrimination issues, inconsistency in sensitivity analysis, and a lack of objectivity. Based on the literature review, it can be concluded that while WtE techniques have the potential to contribute to a more sustainable and resilient society, there are social concerns that must be addressed. The review highlights the importance of conducting comprehensive social assessments in the context of thermal waste conversion. By filling knowledge gaps and considering the social implications of these techniques, a more informed evaluation can be conducted, leading to better decision-making and the development of more sustainable waste management strategies. This effort should be tightly connected to the sustainability efforts and goals in place, such as the ones preconized by the European Commission and the United Nations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Cleaner Production
Journal of Cleaner Production 环境科学-工程:环境
CiteScore
20.40
自引率
9.00%
发文量
4720
审稿时长
111 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Cleaner Production is an international, transdisciplinary journal that addresses and discusses theoretical and practical Cleaner Production, Environmental, and Sustainability issues. It aims to help societies become more sustainable by focusing on the concept of 'Cleaner Production', which aims at preventing waste production and increasing efficiencies in energy, water, resources, and human capital use. The journal serves as a platform for corporations, governments, education institutions, regions, and societies to engage in discussions and research related to Cleaner Production, environmental, and sustainability practices.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信