利用回顾性观察基层医疗、住院和死亡率数据衡量荷兰流感疫苗接种的影响

IF 4.5 3区 医学 Q2 IMMUNOLOGY
{"title":"利用回顾性观察基层医疗、住院和死亡率数据衡量荷兰流感疫苗接种的影响","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.vaccine.2024.126244","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>We aimed to estimate the impact of influenza vaccination in the Netherlands using general practitioner medical records for 2011–2020. We found that vaccinees had higher consultation rates for influenza-like-illness, acute respiratory infections, and pneumonia, as well as antibiotic use, hospitalisations, and several control diagnoses (i.e. illnesses for which there was no a priori expectation that influenza vaccination would play a protective effect). We found similar rates for respiratory mortality and lower all-cause mortality in the vaccinees versus non-vaccinees, mainly driven by the 75+ age group. These results expand, but are fairly consistent with those of previous investigations, and highlight the difficulty of using registry data to assess the impact of vaccination, because of underlying differences between vaccinees and non-vaccinees. Whether these biases also play a role for hospitalisations and mortality remains unclear. Our findings support the implementation of randomized studies to assess the impact of influenza vaccination.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":23491,"journal":{"name":"Vaccine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264410X24009265/pdfft?md5=241329ac5497e74d65689c231166a992&pid=1-s2.0-S0264410X24009265-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Measuring the impact of influenza vaccination in the Netherlands using retrospective observational primary care, hospitalisation and mortality data\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.vaccine.2024.126244\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>We aimed to estimate the impact of influenza vaccination in the Netherlands using general practitioner medical records for 2011–2020. We found that vaccinees had higher consultation rates for influenza-like-illness, acute respiratory infections, and pneumonia, as well as antibiotic use, hospitalisations, and several control diagnoses (i.e. illnesses for which there was no a priori expectation that influenza vaccination would play a protective effect). We found similar rates for respiratory mortality and lower all-cause mortality in the vaccinees versus non-vaccinees, mainly driven by the 75+ age group. These results expand, but are fairly consistent with those of previous investigations, and highlight the difficulty of using registry data to assess the impact of vaccination, because of underlying differences between vaccinees and non-vaccinees. Whether these biases also play a role for hospitalisations and mortality remains unclear. Our findings support the implementation of randomized studies to assess the impact of influenza vaccination.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23491,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Vaccine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264410X24009265/pdfft?md5=241329ac5497e74d65689c231166a992&pid=1-s2.0-S0264410X24009265-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Vaccine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264410X24009265\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"IMMUNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vaccine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264410X24009265","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们的目的是利用 2011-2020 年的全科医生医疗记录来估算流感疫苗接种对荷兰的影响。我们发现,接种疫苗者的流感样疾病、急性呼吸道感染和肺炎就诊率较高,抗生素使用率、住院率和几种对照诊断(即事先并不预期接种流感疫苗会起到保护作用的疾病)也较高。我们发现,接种者与未接种者的呼吸系统死亡率相似,而全因死亡率较低,这主要是由 75 岁以上年龄组造成的。这些结果有所扩大,但与之前的调查结果显示的结果相当一致,并突出了使用登记数据评估疫苗接种影响的难度,因为疫苗接种者和非疫苗接种者之间存在潜在的差异。这些偏差是否对住院率和死亡率也有影响仍不清楚。我们的研究结果支持开展随机研究来评估流感疫苗接种的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Measuring the impact of influenza vaccination in the Netherlands using retrospective observational primary care, hospitalisation and mortality data

We aimed to estimate the impact of influenza vaccination in the Netherlands using general practitioner medical records for 2011–2020. We found that vaccinees had higher consultation rates for influenza-like-illness, acute respiratory infections, and pneumonia, as well as antibiotic use, hospitalisations, and several control diagnoses (i.e. illnesses for which there was no a priori expectation that influenza vaccination would play a protective effect). We found similar rates for respiratory mortality and lower all-cause mortality in the vaccinees versus non-vaccinees, mainly driven by the 75+ age group. These results expand, but are fairly consistent with those of previous investigations, and highlight the difficulty of using registry data to assess the impact of vaccination, because of underlying differences between vaccinees and non-vaccinees. Whether these biases also play a role for hospitalisations and mortality remains unclear. Our findings support the implementation of randomized studies to assess the impact of influenza vaccination.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Vaccine
Vaccine 医学-免疫学
CiteScore
8.70
自引率
5.50%
发文量
992
审稿时长
131 days
期刊介绍: Vaccine is unique in publishing the highest quality science across all disciplines relevant to the field of vaccinology - all original article submissions across basic and clinical research, vaccine manufacturing, history, public policy, behavioral science and ethics, social sciences, safety, and many other related areas are welcomed. The submission categories as given in the Guide for Authors indicate where we receive the most papers. Papers outside these major areas are also welcome and authors are encouraged to contact us with specific questions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信