健康的社会决定因素分析进行因果推断,需要流行病学分析方法

IF 4.9 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
{"title":"健康的社会决定因素分析进行因果推断,需要流行病学分析方法","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.socscimed.2024.117344","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The growing emphasis on reducing health disparities and addressing social determinants of health (SDH) has prompted many national and local health agencies to report population health data by SDH measures. However, many agencies rely on descriptive epidemiology methods for such reports and are susceptible to biased findings due to inadequate confounding control. In this brief analytic essay, using the data presented in an HIV Surveillance Report by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), we demonstrated an example of how reporting health outcomes by SDH with descriptive methods could bias the results and conclusions. SDH are causes of health disparities and SDH analysis requires analytic epidemiology methods to ensure valid research results and effective interventions.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49122,"journal":{"name":"Social Science & Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Social determinants of health analysis makes causal inference and requires analytic epidemiology methods\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.socscimed.2024.117344\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The growing emphasis on reducing health disparities and addressing social determinants of health (SDH) has prompted many national and local health agencies to report population health data by SDH measures. However, many agencies rely on descriptive epidemiology methods for such reports and are susceptible to biased findings due to inadequate confounding control. In this brief analytic essay, using the data presented in an HIV Surveillance Report by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), we demonstrated an example of how reporting health outcomes by SDH with descriptive methods could bias the results and conclusions. SDH are causes of health disparities and SDH analysis requires analytic epidemiology methods to ensure valid research results and effective interventions.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49122,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Social Science & Medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Social Science & Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953624007986\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Science & Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953624007986","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

减少健康差异和解决健康的社会决定因素(SDH)日益受到重视,这促使许多国家和地方卫生机构通过 SDH 指标来报告人口健康数据。然而,许多机构依赖于描述性流行病学方法来进行此类报告,由于混杂控制不足,很容易导致报告结果出现偏差。在这篇简短的分析文章中,我们利用美国疾病控制和预防中心(CDC)在一份 HIV 监测报告中提供的数据,举例说明了用描述性方法报告 SDH 健康结果如何会使结果和结论产生偏差。SDH 是造成健康差异的原因,SDH 分析需要分析流行病学的方法,以确保有效的研究结果和有效的干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Social determinants of health analysis makes causal inference and requires analytic epidemiology methods

The growing emphasis on reducing health disparities and addressing social determinants of health (SDH) has prompted many national and local health agencies to report population health data by SDH measures. However, many agencies rely on descriptive epidemiology methods for such reports and are susceptible to biased findings due to inadequate confounding control. In this brief analytic essay, using the data presented in an HIV Surveillance Report by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), we demonstrated an example of how reporting health outcomes by SDH with descriptive methods could bias the results and conclusions. SDH are causes of health disparities and SDH analysis requires analytic epidemiology methods to ensure valid research results and effective interventions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Social Science & Medicine
Social Science & Medicine PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
5.60%
发文量
762
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: Social Science & Medicine provides an international and interdisciplinary forum for the dissemination of social science research on health. We publish original research articles (both empirical and theoretical), reviews, position papers and commentaries on health issues, to inform current research, policy and practice in all areas of common interest to social scientists, health practitioners, and policy makers. The journal publishes material relevant to any aspect of health from a wide range of social science disciplines (anthropology, economics, epidemiology, geography, policy, psychology, and sociology), and material relevant to the social sciences from any of the professions concerned with physical and mental health, health care, clinical practice, and health policy and organization. We encourage material which is of general interest to an international readership.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信