考虑碳税政策影响下的消费者回扣,优化航运货运代理服务

IF 4.8 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 OCEANOGRAPHY
{"title":"考虑碳税政策影响下的消费者回扣,优化航运货运代理服务","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2024.107361","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Maritime carbon emissions, contributing to approximately 2.89% of global anthropogenic CO<sub>2</sub> emissions, have prompted governments to actively promote a low-carbon shift in the freight forwarding sector. The effect of carbon tax implementation on guiding freight forwarders towards offering more eco-friendly freight forwarding services and facilitating a low-carbon transition remains unclear. This study categorizes freight forwarding services models based on delivery speed, ranging from fast to slow, and environmental friendliness, from low to high. It examines scenarios involving a singular carbon tax and consumer rebates, establishing a freight forwarder model without carbon tax constraints (N-T model), a singular carbon tax model for freight forwarders (C-T model), and a combined carbon tax-consumer rebate model (C-C model). The findings suggest that carbon tax pressures from regulatory bodies ultimately affect consumers; thus, under tax cost pressures, freight forwarders must adapt their shipping strategies. A shift towards more eco-friendly freight forwarding services occurs if the rate of demand growth is less than the increase in fixed delivery costs, and an optimal tax rate can drive this shift. Conversely, when the perceived rebate difference between any two services surpasses a certain threshold, eco-friendly freight forwarding services are consistently favored. In the absence of such conditions, a well-designed carbon tax policy is essential to steer freight forwarders toward reducing carbon emissions.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54698,"journal":{"name":"Ocean & Coastal Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Optimization of shipping freight forwarding services considering consumer rebates under the impact of carbon tax policy\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2024.107361\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Maritime carbon emissions, contributing to approximately 2.89% of global anthropogenic CO<sub>2</sub> emissions, have prompted governments to actively promote a low-carbon shift in the freight forwarding sector. The effect of carbon tax implementation on guiding freight forwarders towards offering more eco-friendly freight forwarding services and facilitating a low-carbon transition remains unclear. This study categorizes freight forwarding services models based on delivery speed, ranging from fast to slow, and environmental friendliness, from low to high. It examines scenarios involving a singular carbon tax and consumer rebates, establishing a freight forwarder model without carbon tax constraints (N-T model), a singular carbon tax model for freight forwarders (C-T model), and a combined carbon tax-consumer rebate model (C-C model). The findings suggest that carbon tax pressures from regulatory bodies ultimately affect consumers; thus, under tax cost pressures, freight forwarders must adapt their shipping strategies. A shift towards more eco-friendly freight forwarding services occurs if the rate of demand growth is less than the increase in fixed delivery costs, and an optimal tax rate can drive this shift. Conversely, when the perceived rebate difference between any two services surpasses a certain threshold, eco-friendly freight forwarding services are consistently favored. In the absence of such conditions, a well-designed carbon tax policy is essential to steer freight forwarders toward reducing carbon emissions.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54698,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ocean & Coastal Management\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ocean & Coastal Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0964569124003466\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OCEANOGRAPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ocean & Coastal Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0964569124003466","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OCEANOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

海运业的碳排放量约占全球人为二氧化碳排放量的 2.89%,这促使各国政府积极推动货运代理行业的低碳转型。碳税的实施对引导货运代理企业提供更环保的货运代理服务、促进低碳转型的影响尚不明确。本研究根据交付速度(从快到慢)和环保程度(从低到高)对货运代理服务模式进行了分类。研究考察了涉及单一碳税和消费者退税的情景,建立了无碳税约束的货运代理模式(N-T 模式)、货运代理单一碳税模式(C-T 模式)和碳税-消费者退税组合模式(C-C 模式)。研究结果表明,来自监管机构的碳税压力最终会影响消费者;因此,在税收成本压力下,货运代理必须调整其运输策略。如果需求增长率低于固定运输成本的增长,货运代理公司就会转向更环保的货运代理服务,而最佳税率可以推动这种转变。反之,当任何两种服务之间的退税差异超过一定临界值时,环保型货运代理服务就会一直受到青睐。在没有这些条件的情况下,精心设计的碳税政策对于引导货运代理减少碳排放至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Optimization of shipping freight forwarding services considering consumer rebates under the impact of carbon tax policy

Maritime carbon emissions, contributing to approximately 2.89% of global anthropogenic CO2 emissions, have prompted governments to actively promote a low-carbon shift in the freight forwarding sector. The effect of carbon tax implementation on guiding freight forwarders towards offering more eco-friendly freight forwarding services and facilitating a low-carbon transition remains unclear. This study categorizes freight forwarding services models based on delivery speed, ranging from fast to slow, and environmental friendliness, from low to high. It examines scenarios involving a singular carbon tax and consumer rebates, establishing a freight forwarder model without carbon tax constraints (N-T model), a singular carbon tax model for freight forwarders (C-T model), and a combined carbon tax-consumer rebate model (C-C model). The findings suggest that carbon tax pressures from regulatory bodies ultimately affect consumers; thus, under tax cost pressures, freight forwarders must adapt their shipping strategies. A shift towards more eco-friendly freight forwarding services occurs if the rate of demand growth is less than the increase in fixed delivery costs, and an optimal tax rate can drive this shift. Conversely, when the perceived rebate difference between any two services surpasses a certain threshold, eco-friendly freight forwarding services are consistently favored. In the absence of such conditions, a well-designed carbon tax policy is essential to steer freight forwarders toward reducing carbon emissions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ocean & Coastal Management
Ocean & Coastal Management 环境科学-海洋学
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
15.20%
发文量
321
审稿时长
60 days
期刊介绍: Ocean & Coastal Management is the leading international journal dedicated to the study of all aspects of ocean and coastal management from the global to local levels. We publish rigorously peer-reviewed manuscripts from all disciplines, and inter-/trans-disciplinary and co-designed research, but all submissions must make clear the relevance to management and/or governance issues relevant to the sustainable development and conservation of oceans and coasts. Comparative studies (from sub-national to trans-national cases, and other management / policy arenas) are encouraged, as are studies that critically assess current management practices and governance approaches. Submissions involving robust analysis, development of theory, and improvement of management practice are especially welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信