Luca Aerts, Michal J Kawczynski, Elham Bidar, Justin Luermans, Marisevi Chaldoupi, Mark La Meir, Mariusz Kowaleski, Jos G Maessen, Samuel Heuts, Bart Maesen
{"title":"胸腔镜消融术与混合胸腔镜消融术对心房颤动患者的短期和长期疗效:系统综述和单个患者数据重建荟萃分析。","authors":"Luca Aerts, Michal J Kawczynski, Elham Bidar, Justin Luermans, Marisevi Chaldoupi, Mark La Meir, Mariusz Kowaleski, Jos G Maessen, Samuel Heuts, Bart Maesen","doi":"10.1093/europace/euae232","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and aims Both isolated thoracoscopic and hybrid thoracoscopic atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation techniques have demonstrated favorable outcomes in the management of patients with (long-standing) persistent AF, as compared to catheter ablation. However, it is currently unknown whether there is a difference in short- and long-term outcomes when comparing these two minimally invasive surgical AF ablation procedures. Therefore, a systematic review and meta-analysis were performed to investigate these two techniques, with a specific emphasis on long-term freedom from atrial tachyarrhythmias (ATA) Methods A systematic search through PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library databases was performed. All studies reporting on short-term outcomes were included in the meta-analysis. A pooled analysis of long-term freedom from ATA was performed based on Kaplan-Meier (KM) curve-derived individual patient data (IPD). Reconstructed individual time-to-event data were analyzed in a multivariable Cox frailty model with adjustments for age, sex, type of AF, duration of AF history, and study variable (frailty term in the frailty Cox model). Results In total, 53 studies were included in the meta-analysis, encompassing 4950 patients. There were no differences in major short-term outcomes (mortality or stroke) between isolated thoracoscopic and hybrid thoracoscopic ablation. A total of 18 studies reported KM curves for long-term freedom from ATA, comprising 2038 patients. Adjusted analysis revealed that hybrid ablation was significantly associated with greater freedom from ATA (Adjusted Hazard Ratio [aHR]=0.59, 95%CI: 0.43-0.83, p<0.001) compared to isolated thoracoscopic ablation. Additionally, older age (aHR=1.07, 95%CI: 1.03-1.12, p=0.002) and a higher percentage of male patients (aHR=1.02, 95% CI: 1.01-1.03, p<0.001) were significantly associated with lower long-term freedom from ATA recurrence. Conclusion Hybrid thoracoscopic AF-ablation is associated with a greater long-term freedom from ATA when compared to isolated thoracoscopic ablation, without differences in complications.","PeriodicalId":11720,"journal":{"name":"EP Europace","volume":"95 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Short- and long-term outcomes in thoracoscopic versus hybrid thoracoscopic ablation in patients with atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and reconstructed individual patient data meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Luca Aerts, Michal J Kawczynski, Elham Bidar, Justin Luermans, Marisevi Chaldoupi, Mark La Meir, Mariusz Kowaleski, Jos G Maessen, Samuel Heuts, Bart Maesen\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/europace/euae232\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background and aims Both isolated thoracoscopic and hybrid thoracoscopic atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation techniques have demonstrated favorable outcomes in the management of patients with (long-standing) persistent AF, as compared to catheter ablation. However, it is currently unknown whether there is a difference in short- and long-term outcomes when comparing these two minimally invasive surgical AF ablation procedures. Therefore, a systematic review and meta-analysis were performed to investigate these two techniques, with a specific emphasis on long-term freedom from atrial tachyarrhythmias (ATA) Methods A systematic search through PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library databases was performed. All studies reporting on short-term outcomes were included in the meta-analysis. A pooled analysis of long-term freedom from ATA was performed based on Kaplan-Meier (KM) curve-derived individual patient data (IPD). Reconstructed individual time-to-event data were analyzed in a multivariable Cox frailty model with adjustments for age, sex, type of AF, duration of AF history, and study variable (frailty term in the frailty Cox model). Results In total, 53 studies were included in the meta-analysis, encompassing 4950 patients. There were no differences in major short-term outcomes (mortality or stroke) between isolated thoracoscopic and hybrid thoracoscopic ablation. A total of 18 studies reported KM curves for long-term freedom from ATA, comprising 2038 patients. Adjusted analysis revealed that hybrid ablation was significantly associated with greater freedom from ATA (Adjusted Hazard Ratio [aHR]=0.59, 95%CI: 0.43-0.83, p<0.001) compared to isolated thoracoscopic ablation. Additionally, older age (aHR=1.07, 95%CI: 1.03-1.12, p=0.002) and a higher percentage of male patients (aHR=1.02, 95% CI: 1.01-1.03, p<0.001) were significantly associated with lower long-term freedom from ATA recurrence. Conclusion Hybrid thoracoscopic AF-ablation is associated with a greater long-term freedom from ATA when compared to isolated thoracoscopic ablation, without differences in complications.\",\"PeriodicalId\":11720,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"EP Europace\",\"volume\":\"95 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"EP Europace\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/europace/euae232\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EP Europace","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/europace/euae232","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景和目的 与导管消融术相比,孤立胸腔镜和混合胸腔镜心房颤动(房颤)消融技术在治疗(长期)持续性房颤患者方面都取得了良好的疗效。然而,目前尚不清楚这两种微创手术房颤消融术的短期和长期疗效是否存在差异。因此,我们对这两种技术进行了系统性回顾和荟萃分析,特别强调了长期免于房性快速性心律失常(ATA)的情况。所有报告短期结果的研究都纳入了荟萃分析。根据 Kaplan-Meier (KM) 曲线得出的单个患者数据 (IPD) 对长期免于 ATA 进行了汇总分析。在多变量 Cox 衰弱模型中分析了重建的个体事件时间数据,并对年龄、性别、房颤类型、房颤病史持续时间和研究变量(衰弱 Cox 模型中的衰弱项)进行了调整。结果 本次荟萃分析共纳入 53 项研究,涵盖 4950 名患者。孤立胸腔镜消融术和混合胸腔镜消融术在主要短期结果(死亡率或中风)方面没有差异。共有18项研究报告了长期免于ATA的KM曲线,其中包括2038名患者。调整后的分析显示,与孤立胸腔镜消融术相比,混合消融术与更大的 ATA 自由度显著相关(调整后危险比 [aHR]=0.59, 95%CI: 0.43-0.83,p<0.001)。此外,年龄越大(aHR=1.07,95%CI:1.03-1.12,p=0.002)、男性患者比例越高(aHR=1.02,95%CI:1.01-1.03,p<0.001),ATA 长期复发率越低。结论 与孤立的胸腔镜消融术相比,混合胸腔镜房颤消融术与更高的 ATA 长期免复发率相关,但并发症方面无差异。
Short- and long-term outcomes in thoracoscopic versus hybrid thoracoscopic ablation in patients with atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and reconstructed individual patient data meta-analysis.
Background and aims Both isolated thoracoscopic and hybrid thoracoscopic atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation techniques have demonstrated favorable outcomes in the management of patients with (long-standing) persistent AF, as compared to catheter ablation. However, it is currently unknown whether there is a difference in short- and long-term outcomes when comparing these two minimally invasive surgical AF ablation procedures. Therefore, a systematic review and meta-analysis were performed to investigate these two techniques, with a specific emphasis on long-term freedom from atrial tachyarrhythmias (ATA) Methods A systematic search through PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library databases was performed. All studies reporting on short-term outcomes were included in the meta-analysis. A pooled analysis of long-term freedom from ATA was performed based on Kaplan-Meier (KM) curve-derived individual patient data (IPD). Reconstructed individual time-to-event data were analyzed in a multivariable Cox frailty model with adjustments for age, sex, type of AF, duration of AF history, and study variable (frailty term in the frailty Cox model). Results In total, 53 studies were included in the meta-analysis, encompassing 4950 patients. There were no differences in major short-term outcomes (mortality or stroke) between isolated thoracoscopic and hybrid thoracoscopic ablation. A total of 18 studies reported KM curves for long-term freedom from ATA, comprising 2038 patients. Adjusted analysis revealed that hybrid ablation was significantly associated with greater freedom from ATA (Adjusted Hazard Ratio [aHR]=0.59, 95%CI: 0.43-0.83, p<0.001) compared to isolated thoracoscopic ablation. Additionally, older age (aHR=1.07, 95%CI: 1.03-1.12, p=0.002) and a higher percentage of male patients (aHR=1.02, 95% CI: 1.01-1.03, p<0.001) were significantly associated with lower long-term freedom from ATA recurrence. Conclusion Hybrid thoracoscopic AF-ablation is associated with a greater long-term freedom from ATA when compared to isolated thoracoscopic ablation, without differences in complications.