评估合格电子签名的可用性:系统化使用案例和设计范例

Mustafa Cagal, Kemal Bicakci
{"title":"评估合格电子签名的可用性:系统化使用案例和设计范例","authors":"Mustafa Cagal, Kemal Bicakci","doi":"arxiv-2408.14349","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Despite being legally equivalent to handwritten signatures, Qualified\nElectronic Signatures (QES) have not yet achieved significant market success.\nQES offer substantial potential for reducing reliance on paper-based contracts,\nenabling secure digital applications, and standardizing public services.\nHowever, there is limited information on their usability despite the extensive\nrange of use cases. To address this gap, we systematize QES use cases and\ncategorize the system designs implemented to support these use cases,\nemphasizing the necessity to evaluate their respective strengths and weaknesses\nthrough usability studies. Additionally, we present findings from cognitive\nwalkthroughs conducted on use cases across four different QES systems. We\nanticipate that this work will serve as a foundation for a significant\nexpansion of research into the usability of Qualified Electronic Signatures.","PeriodicalId":501310,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - CS - Other Computer Science","volume":"27 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating the Usability of Qualified Electronic Signatures: Systematized Use Cases and Design Paradigms\",\"authors\":\"Mustafa Cagal, Kemal Bicakci\",\"doi\":\"arxiv-2408.14349\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Despite being legally equivalent to handwritten signatures, Qualified\\nElectronic Signatures (QES) have not yet achieved significant market success.\\nQES offer substantial potential for reducing reliance on paper-based contracts,\\nenabling secure digital applications, and standardizing public services.\\nHowever, there is limited information on their usability despite the extensive\\nrange of use cases. To address this gap, we systematize QES use cases and\\ncategorize the system designs implemented to support these use cases,\\nemphasizing the necessity to evaluate their respective strengths and weaknesses\\nthrough usability studies. Additionally, we present findings from cognitive\\nwalkthroughs conducted on use cases across four different QES systems. We\\nanticipate that this work will serve as a foundation for a significant\\nexpansion of research into the usability of Qualified Electronic Signatures.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501310,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"arXiv - CS - Other Computer Science\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"arXiv - CS - Other Computer Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/arxiv-2408.14349\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - CS - Other Computer Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2408.14349","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

尽管合格电子签名(QES)在法律上等同于手写签名,但它尚未在市场上取得重大成功。QES 在减少对纸质合同的依赖、实现安全数字应用和公共服务标准化方面具有巨大潜力。为了弥补这一不足,我们对 QES 用例进行了系统化,并对为支持这些用例而实施的系统设计进行了分类,强调有必要通过可用性研究来评估它们各自的优缺点。此外,我们还介绍了对四种不同的 QES 系统的用例进行认知测试的结果。我们预计,这项工作将为大幅扩展合格电子签名的可用性研究奠定基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluating the Usability of Qualified Electronic Signatures: Systematized Use Cases and Design Paradigms
Despite being legally equivalent to handwritten signatures, Qualified Electronic Signatures (QES) have not yet achieved significant market success. QES offer substantial potential for reducing reliance on paper-based contracts, enabling secure digital applications, and standardizing public services. However, there is limited information on their usability despite the extensive range of use cases. To address this gap, we systematize QES use cases and categorize the system designs implemented to support these use cases, emphasizing the necessity to evaluate their respective strengths and weaknesses through usability studies. Additionally, we present findings from cognitive walkthroughs conducted on use cases across four different QES systems. We anticipate that this work will serve as a foundation for a significant expansion of research into the usability of Qualified Electronic Signatures.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信