Fang Wang, PengCheng Xue, ShunYi Wang, YunHuai Liu
{"title":"遗产保护对城市碳排放影响的研究","authors":"Fang Wang, PengCheng Xue, ShunYi Wang, YunHuai Liu","doi":"10.1007/s11431-023-2593-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>A major goal of current international urban development and construction is to lower carbon emissions. Synergies exist between the preservation of historic cities and the development of low-carbon cities; however, the relationship between preservation of historic cities and carbon emissions remains unclear. This study focuses on the cities in the “Yellow-Canal-Yangtze” watershed community, which includes the Yellow River Basin, Yangtze River Basin, and the Grand Canal region, and aims to verify the differences in CO<sub>2</sub> emissions (CE) between historic and non-historic cities through multiple comparisons after ANOVA. Additionally, Ridge Regression was used to determine the impact and dimensions of the relevant variables associated with the preservation of historic cities on CE. Combined with national development goals, this study predicts changes in the CE of historic city preservation under different scenarios. This study found significant differences between historic and non-historic cities, as the total CE of historic cities is 2.42 times higher than that of non-historic cities. The dimension with the largest difference was the CE related to transportation, with aviation emissions of historic cities reaching 15.22 times higher than that of non-historic cities. Although the preservation of historic cities has led to an overall increase in the CE, there is significant potential for CE reduction in land use, transportation infrastructure, and tourism development related to historic city preservation. In the future, historic cities can contribute to China’s carbon neutrality and the United Nation’s development goals through the creation of larger historical preservation areas, more convenient public transportation, and more vibrant tourism.</p>","PeriodicalId":21612,"journal":{"name":"Science China Technological Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A study on the impact of heritage protection on urban carbon emissions\",\"authors\":\"Fang Wang, PengCheng Xue, ShunYi Wang, YunHuai Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11431-023-2593-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>A major goal of current international urban development and construction is to lower carbon emissions. Synergies exist between the preservation of historic cities and the development of low-carbon cities; however, the relationship between preservation of historic cities and carbon emissions remains unclear. This study focuses on the cities in the “Yellow-Canal-Yangtze” watershed community, which includes the Yellow River Basin, Yangtze River Basin, and the Grand Canal region, and aims to verify the differences in CO<sub>2</sub> emissions (CE) between historic and non-historic cities through multiple comparisons after ANOVA. Additionally, Ridge Regression was used to determine the impact and dimensions of the relevant variables associated with the preservation of historic cities on CE. Combined with national development goals, this study predicts changes in the CE of historic city preservation under different scenarios. This study found significant differences between historic and non-historic cities, as the total CE of historic cities is 2.42 times higher than that of non-historic cities. The dimension with the largest difference was the CE related to transportation, with aviation emissions of historic cities reaching 15.22 times higher than that of non-historic cities. Although the preservation of historic cities has led to an overall increase in the CE, there is significant potential for CE reduction in land use, transportation infrastructure, and tourism development related to historic city preservation. In the future, historic cities can contribute to China’s carbon neutrality and the United Nation’s development goals through the creation of larger historical preservation areas, more convenient public transportation, and more vibrant tourism.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21612,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Science China Technological Sciences\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Science China Technological Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-023-2593-4\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Science China Technological Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-023-2593-4","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
当前国际城市发展和建设的一个主要目标是降低碳排放。历史名城保护与低碳城市发展之间存在协同效应,但历史名城保护与碳排放之间的关系尚不明确。本研究以 "黄-运-扬 "流域群落(包括黄河流域、长江流域和大运河地区)中的城市为研究对象,旨在通过方差分析后的多重比较,验证历史名城与非历史名城之间二氧化碳排放量(CE)的差异。此外,还采用岭回归法确定历史名城保护相关变量对 CE 的影响和维度。结合国家发展目标,本研究预测了不同情况下历史名城保护的 CE 变化。研究发现,历史名城与非历史名城之间存在显著差异,历史名城的总 CE 是非历史名城的 2.42 倍。差异最大的是与交通相关的 CE,历史名城的航空排放量是非历史名城的 15.22 倍。虽然历史名城的保护导致了 CE 的整体增加,但与历史名城保护相关的土地利用、交通基础设施和旅游开发在减少 CE 方面仍有巨大潜力。未来,历史名城可以通过创建更大的历史保护区、更便捷的公共交通和更有活力的旅游业,为中国的碳中和和联合国的发展目标做出贡献。
A study on the impact of heritage protection on urban carbon emissions
A major goal of current international urban development and construction is to lower carbon emissions. Synergies exist between the preservation of historic cities and the development of low-carbon cities; however, the relationship between preservation of historic cities and carbon emissions remains unclear. This study focuses on the cities in the “Yellow-Canal-Yangtze” watershed community, which includes the Yellow River Basin, Yangtze River Basin, and the Grand Canal region, and aims to verify the differences in CO2 emissions (CE) between historic and non-historic cities through multiple comparisons after ANOVA. Additionally, Ridge Regression was used to determine the impact and dimensions of the relevant variables associated with the preservation of historic cities on CE. Combined with national development goals, this study predicts changes in the CE of historic city preservation under different scenarios. This study found significant differences between historic and non-historic cities, as the total CE of historic cities is 2.42 times higher than that of non-historic cities. The dimension with the largest difference was the CE related to transportation, with aviation emissions of historic cities reaching 15.22 times higher than that of non-historic cities. Although the preservation of historic cities has led to an overall increase in the CE, there is significant potential for CE reduction in land use, transportation infrastructure, and tourism development related to historic city preservation. In the future, historic cities can contribute to China’s carbon neutrality and the United Nation’s development goals through the creation of larger historical preservation areas, more convenient public transportation, and more vibrant tourism.
期刊介绍:
Science China Technological Sciences, an academic journal cosponsored by the Chinese Academy of Sciences and the National Natural Science Foundation of China, and published by Science China Press, is committed to publishing high-quality, original results in both basic and applied research.
Science China Technological Sciences is published in both print and electronic forms. It is indexed by Science Citation Index.
Categories of articles:
Reviews summarize representative results and achievements in a particular topic or an area, comment on the current state of research, and advise on the research directions. The author’s own opinion and related discussion is requested.
Research papers report on important original results in all areas of technological sciences.
Brief reports present short reports in a timely manner of the latest important results.