不同教育体制下当代数学教学能力的维度和不变性

IF 1.9 3区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Pongprapan Pongsophon
{"title":"不同教育体制下当代数学教学能力的维度和不变性","authors":"Pongprapan Pongsophon","doi":"10.1007/s10763-024-10502-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study investigates Contemporary Mathematical Instruction Competence (CMIC) using the PISA 2022 dataset. The research aims to identify the underlying dimensions of CMIC and assess their consistency across different cultural contexts. Variables were selected from teacher surveys in PISA 2022, focusing on mathematical reasoning, cognitive competencies, ICT use, and teaching goals. Data manipulation, cleaning, and factor analysis were performed in R. Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) and Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) were conducted to validate the construct. EFA results indicated a well-defined two-factor structure: Technological and Collaborative Competence (TCC) and Cognitive and Pedagogical Competence (CPC). CFA confirmed this structure, with fit indices showing an excellent model fit (CFI = 0.984, TLI = 0.976, RMSEA = 0.046). Cross-cultural validation demonstrated the robustness of the CMIC model across nine countries: Australia, Brazil, Colombia, Kosovo, Korea, Malaysia, Panama, United Arab Emirates, and the United States. Partial scalar invariance was achieved, indicating acceptable model fit. These findings highlight the importance of integrating technological and cognitive competencies in mathematics instruction and suggest that CMIC is a relevant construct across diverse educational settings. Future research should explore further cross-cultural validations and the impact of educational policies on CMIC development.</p>","PeriodicalId":14267,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education","volume":"28 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dimensionality and Invariance of Contemporary Mathematical Instruction Competence across Educational Systems\",\"authors\":\"Pongprapan Pongsophon\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10763-024-10502-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>This study investigates Contemporary Mathematical Instruction Competence (CMIC) using the PISA 2022 dataset. The research aims to identify the underlying dimensions of CMIC and assess their consistency across different cultural contexts. Variables were selected from teacher surveys in PISA 2022, focusing on mathematical reasoning, cognitive competencies, ICT use, and teaching goals. Data manipulation, cleaning, and factor analysis were performed in R. Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) and Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) were conducted to validate the construct. EFA results indicated a well-defined two-factor structure: Technological and Collaborative Competence (TCC) and Cognitive and Pedagogical Competence (CPC). CFA confirmed this structure, with fit indices showing an excellent model fit (CFI = 0.984, TLI = 0.976, RMSEA = 0.046). Cross-cultural validation demonstrated the robustness of the CMIC model across nine countries: Australia, Brazil, Colombia, Kosovo, Korea, Malaysia, Panama, United Arab Emirates, and the United States. Partial scalar invariance was achieved, indicating acceptable model fit. These findings highlight the importance of integrating technological and cognitive competencies in mathematics instruction and suggest that CMIC is a relevant construct across diverse educational settings. Future research should explore further cross-cultural validations and the impact of educational policies on CMIC development.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14267,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education\",\"volume\":\"28 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-024-10502-1\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-024-10502-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究利用 PISA 2022 数据集对当代数学教学能力(CMIC)进行了调查。研究旨在确定 CMIC 的基本维度,并评估其在不同文化背景下的一致性。变量选自 PISA 2022 的教师调查,重点关注数学推理、认知能力、信息和通信技术的使用以及教学目标。数据处理、清理和因子分析均在 R 语言中进行,并通过探索性因子分析(EFA)和确证性因子分析(CFA)来验证建构。EFA 结果表明存在一个定义明确的双因素结构:技术与协作能力(TCC)和认知与教学能力(CPC)。CFA 证实了这一结构,拟合指数显示模型拟合度极佳(CFI = 0.984,TLI = 0.976,RMSEA = 0.046)。跨文化验证证明了 CMIC 模型在九个国家的稳健性:澳大利亚、巴西、哥伦比亚、科索沃、韩国、马来西亚、巴拿马、阿拉伯联合酋长国和美国。实现了部分标度不变性,表明模型的拟合度可以接受。这些研究结果凸显了在数学教学中整合技术和认知能力的重要性,并表明 CMIC 是一个跨越不同教育环境的相关建构。未来的研究应进一步探索跨文化验证以及教育政策对 CMIC 发展的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Dimensionality and Invariance of Contemporary Mathematical Instruction Competence across Educational Systems

Dimensionality and Invariance of Contemporary Mathematical Instruction Competence across Educational Systems

This study investigates Contemporary Mathematical Instruction Competence (CMIC) using the PISA 2022 dataset. The research aims to identify the underlying dimensions of CMIC and assess their consistency across different cultural contexts. Variables were selected from teacher surveys in PISA 2022, focusing on mathematical reasoning, cognitive competencies, ICT use, and teaching goals. Data manipulation, cleaning, and factor analysis were performed in R. Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) and Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) were conducted to validate the construct. EFA results indicated a well-defined two-factor structure: Technological and Collaborative Competence (TCC) and Cognitive and Pedagogical Competence (CPC). CFA confirmed this structure, with fit indices showing an excellent model fit (CFI = 0.984, TLI = 0.976, RMSEA = 0.046). Cross-cultural validation demonstrated the robustness of the CMIC model across nine countries: Australia, Brazil, Colombia, Kosovo, Korea, Malaysia, Panama, United Arab Emirates, and the United States. Partial scalar invariance was achieved, indicating acceptable model fit. These findings highlight the importance of integrating technological and cognitive competencies in mathematics instruction and suggest that CMIC is a relevant construct across diverse educational settings. Future research should explore further cross-cultural validations and the impact of educational policies on CMIC development.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
9.10%
发文量
87
期刊介绍: The objective of this journal is to publish original, fully peer-reviewed articles on a variety of topics and research methods in both science and mathematics education. The journal welcomes articles that address common issues in mathematics and science education and cross-curricular dimensions more widely. Specific attention will be paid to manuscripts written by authors whose native language is not English and the editors have made arrangements for support in re-writing where appropriate. Contemporary educators highlight the importance of viewing knowledge as context-oriented and not limited to one domain. This concurs with current curriculum reforms worldwide for interdisciplinary and integrated curricula. Modern educational practice also focuses on the use of new technology in assisting instruction which may be easily implemented into such an integrated curriculum. The journal welcomes studies that explore science and mathematics education from different cultural perspectives.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信