在脑卒中患者上肢神经康复过程中提高脑机接口性能的特定主题会话到会话迁移学习策略

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q4 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Ruben I. Carino-Escobar, Luis A. Franceschi-Jimenez, Paul Carrillo-Mora, Jessica Cantillo-Negrete
{"title":"在脑卒中患者上肢神经康复过程中提高脑机接口性能的特定主题会话到会话迁移学习策略","authors":"Ruben I. Carino-Escobar, Luis A. Franceschi-Jimenez, Paul Carrillo-Mora, Jessica Cantillo-Negrete","doi":"10.1007/s40846-024-00891-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Purpose</h3><p>To assess if transfer learning strategies can improve stroke patients’ ability to control a Brain-computer interface (BCI) based on motor intention across an upper extremity neurorehabilitation intervention.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Methods</h3><p>Three subject-specific session-to-session training strategies were retrospectively assessed in the present study, using information acquired during a BCI intervention in 12 stroke patients. One strategy used data from the previous therapy session (previous session), another used data from all previous sessions (accumulative) and another initially used previous session’s data and was updated with data acquired during the current session (instantaneous).</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>Classification accuracy was significantly higher with the instantaneous strategy (median = 76.4%, IQR = [68.7%, 81.5%]) compared to the obtained with the accumulative (71.67%, [65.1%, 78.5%]) and previous session (69.2%, [59%, 77.4%]) strategies. Median classification accuracies across sessions were also higher with the instantaneous strategy in each BCI intervention session.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusion</h3><p>The instantaneous strategy could allow stroke patients to achieve a competitive level of BCI performance during a motor intention BCI intervention without reducing effective therapy time or requiring data from other patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":50133,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical and Biological Engineering","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Subject-Specific Session-to-Session Transfer Learning Strategies for Increasing Brain-Computer Interface Performance during Upper Extremity Neurorehabilitation in Stroke\",\"authors\":\"Ruben I. Carino-Escobar, Luis A. Franceschi-Jimenez, Paul Carrillo-Mora, Jessica Cantillo-Negrete\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s40846-024-00891-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Purpose</h3><p>To assess if transfer learning strategies can improve stroke patients’ ability to control a Brain-computer interface (BCI) based on motor intention across an upper extremity neurorehabilitation intervention.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Methods</h3><p>Three subject-specific session-to-session training strategies were retrospectively assessed in the present study, using information acquired during a BCI intervention in 12 stroke patients. One strategy used data from the previous therapy session (previous session), another used data from all previous sessions (accumulative) and another initially used previous session’s data and was updated with data acquired during the current session (instantaneous).</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Results</h3><p>Classification accuracy was significantly higher with the instantaneous strategy (median = 76.4%, IQR = [68.7%, 81.5%]) compared to the obtained with the accumulative (71.67%, [65.1%, 78.5%]) and previous session (69.2%, [59%, 77.4%]) strategies. Median classification accuracies across sessions were also higher with the instantaneous strategy in each BCI intervention session.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Conclusion</h3><p>The instantaneous strategy could allow stroke patients to achieve a competitive level of BCI performance during a motor intention BCI intervention without reducing effective therapy time or requiring data from other patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50133,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Medical and Biological Engineering\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Medical and Biological Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40846-024-00891-7\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical and Biological Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40846-024-00891-7","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的评估迁移学习策略能否提高中风患者在上肢神经康复干预过程中根据运动意向控制脑机接口(BCI)的能力。方法在本研究中,利用在对 12 名中风患者进行 BCI 干预期间获得的信息,对三种针对特定对象的会话到会话训练策略进行了回顾性评估。结果与累积策略(71.67%,[65.1%,78.5%])和上一疗程策略(69.2%,[59%,77.4%])相比,瞬时策略的分类准确率明显更高(中位数 = 76.4%,IQR = [68.7%,81.5%])。结论瞬时策略可以让脑卒中患者在运动意向BCI干预期间达到具有竞争力的BCI性能水平,而不会减少有效治疗时间或需要其他患者的数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Subject-Specific Session-to-Session Transfer Learning Strategies for Increasing Brain-Computer Interface Performance during Upper Extremity Neurorehabilitation in Stroke

Subject-Specific Session-to-Session Transfer Learning Strategies for Increasing Brain-Computer Interface Performance during Upper Extremity Neurorehabilitation in Stroke

Purpose

To assess if transfer learning strategies can improve stroke patients’ ability to control a Brain-computer interface (BCI) based on motor intention across an upper extremity neurorehabilitation intervention.

Methods

Three subject-specific session-to-session training strategies were retrospectively assessed in the present study, using information acquired during a BCI intervention in 12 stroke patients. One strategy used data from the previous therapy session (previous session), another used data from all previous sessions (accumulative) and another initially used previous session’s data and was updated with data acquired during the current session (instantaneous).

Results

Classification accuracy was significantly higher with the instantaneous strategy (median = 76.4%, IQR = [68.7%, 81.5%]) compared to the obtained with the accumulative (71.67%, [65.1%, 78.5%]) and previous session (69.2%, [59%, 77.4%]) strategies. Median classification accuracies across sessions were also higher with the instantaneous strategy in each BCI intervention session.

Conclusion

The instantaneous strategy could allow stroke patients to achieve a competitive level of BCI performance during a motor intention BCI intervention without reducing effective therapy time or requiring data from other patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
5.00%
发文量
81
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The purpose of Journal of Medical and Biological Engineering, JMBE, is committed to encouraging and providing the standard of biomedical engineering. The journal is devoted to publishing papers related to clinical engineering, biomedical signals, medical imaging, bio-informatics, tissue engineering, and so on. Other than the above articles, any contributions regarding hot issues and technological developments that help reach the purpose are also included.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信