超越(记录)簿:比较幼儿加速度计非磨损检测技术

Elyse Letts, Sarah M da Silva, Natascja Di Cristofaro, Sara King-Dowling, Joyce Obeid
{"title":"超越(记录)簿:比较幼儿加速度计非磨损检测技术","authors":"Elyse Letts, Sarah M da Silva, Natascja Di Cristofaro, Sara King-Dowling, Joyce Obeid","doi":"10.1101/2024.09.04.24312946","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<strong>Background</strong> Accelerometers are increasingly used to measure physical activity and sedentary time in toddlers. Data cleaning or wear time validation can impact outcomes of interest, particularly in young children who spend less time awake. However, no study has systematically compared wear time validation strategies in toddlers. As such, the objective of this study is to compare different fully-automated methods of distinguishing wear and non-wear time (counts and raw data algorithms) to the semi-automated (counts with logbooks) criterion method in toddlers.","PeriodicalId":501071,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv - Epidemiology","volume":"59 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Beyond the (log)book: Comparing accelerometer non-wear detection techniques in toddlers\",\"authors\":\"Elyse Letts, Sarah M da Silva, Natascja Di Cristofaro, Sara King-Dowling, Joyce Obeid\",\"doi\":\"10.1101/2024.09.04.24312946\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<strong>Background</strong> Accelerometers are increasingly used to measure physical activity and sedentary time in toddlers. Data cleaning or wear time validation can impact outcomes of interest, particularly in young children who spend less time awake. However, no study has systematically compared wear time validation strategies in toddlers. As such, the objective of this study is to compare different fully-automated methods of distinguishing wear and non-wear time (counts and raw data algorithms) to the semi-automated (counts with logbooks) criterion method in toddlers.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501071,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"medRxiv - Epidemiology\",\"volume\":\"59 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"medRxiv - Epidemiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.09.04.24312946\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv - Epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.09.04.24312946","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景 加速计越来越多地用于测量幼儿的体力活动和久坐时间。数据清理或佩戴时间验证会影响相关结果,尤其是对清醒时间较短的幼儿。然而,还没有研究系统地比较过幼儿的佩戴时间验证策略。因此,本研究的目的是比较不同的全自动方法(计数和原始数据算法)与半自动方法(计数和日志)在幼儿中区分磨损和非磨损时间的标准方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Beyond the (log)book: Comparing accelerometer non-wear detection techniques in toddlers
Background Accelerometers are increasingly used to measure physical activity and sedentary time in toddlers. Data cleaning or wear time validation can impact outcomes of interest, particularly in young children who spend less time awake. However, no study has systematically compared wear time validation strategies in toddlers. As such, the objective of this study is to compare different fully-automated methods of distinguishing wear and non-wear time (counts and raw data algorithms) to the semi-automated (counts with logbooks) criterion method in toddlers.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信