利用 TOPSIS 方法中权重标准重要性的战略敏感性选择最佳原油沥青烯控制化学添加剂

IF 5.9 3区 工程技术 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Syed Imran Ali, Shaine Mohammadali Lalji, Liping Zhang, Nusrat Husain, Agha Yasir Ali, Ashraf Yahya, Muneeb Burney, Tariq Jamil, Zeeshan Ahmad Arfeen
{"title":"利用 TOPSIS 方法中权重标准重要性的战略敏感性选择最佳原油沥青烯控制化学添加剂","authors":"Syed Imran Ali, Shaine Mohammadali Lalji, Liping Zhang, Nusrat Husain, Agha Yasir Ali, Ashraf Yahya, Muneeb Burney, Tariq Jamil, Zeeshan Ahmad Arfeen","doi":"10.1016/j.jiec.2024.08.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The main aim of this work is to determine performance ranking of asphaltene controlling chemical additives using Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) method. The performance of four chemicals namely; Cocamide Diethanolamide (CDEA), Dodecyl Benzene Sulphonic Acid (DBSA), Salicylic Acid, and Toluene were evaluated on crude oil of Pakistani origin. The performance of chemical additives was evaluated before and after the initiation of asphaltene precipitation as chemical performance during pre-treatment and post-treatment stage respectively. TOPSIS method was used to incorporate different parameter of experiment as criteria and further the weight of criteria importance were altered to yield rankings of chemicals under different scenarios. Three cases were developed to implement TOPSIS method. For case – 1 and Case – 2, generally, DBSA found to be the best additive while for case – 3 Salicylic acid and Toluene was proved to be rank 1 additive. The alteration of weight importance of criteria affects the chemical additive ranking. This research work highlighted the importance of decision making process for the selection of chemical additives considering the desired specific role of chemical additive to be used for the prevention and mitigation of asphaltene deposition in crude oil.","PeriodicalId":363,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Selection of best apshaltene controlling chemical additive for crude oil using strategic sensitivity of weight criteria importance in TOPSIS method\",\"authors\":\"Syed Imran Ali, Shaine Mohammadali Lalji, Liping Zhang, Nusrat Husain, Agha Yasir Ali, Ashraf Yahya, Muneeb Burney, Tariq Jamil, Zeeshan Ahmad Arfeen\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jiec.2024.08.005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The main aim of this work is to determine performance ranking of asphaltene controlling chemical additives using Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) method. The performance of four chemicals namely; Cocamide Diethanolamide (CDEA), Dodecyl Benzene Sulphonic Acid (DBSA), Salicylic Acid, and Toluene were evaluated on crude oil of Pakistani origin. The performance of chemical additives was evaluated before and after the initiation of asphaltene precipitation as chemical performance during pre-treatment and post-treatment stage respectively. TOPSIS method was used to incorporate different parameter of experiment as criteria and further the weight of criteria importance were altered to yield rankings of chemicals under different scenarios. Three cases were developed to implement TOPSIS method. For case – 1 and Case – 2, generally, DBSA found to be the best additive while for case – 3 Salicylic acid and Toluene was proved to be rank 1 additive. The alteration of weight importance of criteria affects the chemical additive ranking. This research work highlighted the importance of decision making process for the selection of chemical additives considering the desired specific role of chemical additive to be used for the prevention and mitigation of asphaltene deposition in crude oil.\",\"PeriodicalId\":363,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiec.2024.08.005\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiec.2024.08.005","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这项工作的主要目的是利用与理想解相似的优选顺序技术(TOPSIS)确定沥青质控制化学添加剂的性能等级。在巴基斯坦原油中对四种化学品(即椰油酰胺二乙醇酰胺(CDEA)、十二烷基苯磺酸(DBSA)、水杨酸和甲苯)的性能进行了评估。在沥青烯沉淀开始之前和之后,分别对化学添加剂在预处理和后处理阶段的化学性能进行了评估。采用 TOPSIS 方法将不同的实验参数作为标准,并进一步改变标准重要性的权重,以得出不同情况下化学品的排名。为实施 TOPSIS 方法,开发了三种情况。在案例 1 和案例 2 中,DBSA 被认为是最佳添加剂,而在案例 3 中,水杨酸和甲苯被证明是排名第一的添加剂。标准权重的改变会影响化学添加剂的排名。这项研究工作强调了选择化学添加剂决策过程的重要性,考虑到了化学添加剂在防止和减轻原油中沥青质沉积方面的预期具体作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Selection of best apshaltene controlling chemical additive for crude oil using strategic sensitivity of weight criteria importance in TOPSIS method
The main aim of this work is to determine performance ranking of asphaltene controlling chemical additives using Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) method. The performance of four chemicals namely; Cocamide Diethanolamide (CDEA), Dodecyl Benzene Sulphonic Acid (DBSA), Salicylic Acid, and Toluene were evaluated on crude oil of Pakistani origin. The performance of chemical additives was evaluated before and after the initiation of asphaltene precipitation as chemical performance during pre-treatment and post-treatment stage respectively. TOPSIS method was used to incorporate different parameter of experiment as criteria and further the weight of criteria importance were altered to yield rankings of chemicals under different scenarios. Three cases were developed to implement TOPSIS method. For case – 1 and Case – 2, generally, DBSA found to be the best additive while for case – 3 Salicylic acid and Toluene was proved to be rank 1 additive. The alteration of weight importance of criteria affects the chemical additive ranking. This research work highlighted the importance of decision making process for the selection of chemical additives considering the desired specific role of chemical additive to be used for the prevention and mitigation of asphaltene deposition in crude oil.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.40
自引率
6.60%
发文量
639
审稿时长
29 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry is published monthly in English by the Korean Society of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry. JIEC brings together multidisciplinary interests in one journal and is to disseminate information on all aspects of research and development in industrial and engineering chemistry. Contributions in the form of research articles, short communications, notes and reviews are considered for publication. The editors welcome original contributions that have not been and are not to be published elsewhere. Instruction to authors and a manuscript submissions form are printed at the end of each issue. Bulk reprints of individual articles can be ordered. This publication is partially supported by Korea Research Foundation and the Korean Federation of Science and Technology Societies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信