SARS-CoV-2 的废水监测:两种浓度方法的比较

Viruses Pub Date : 2024-08-31 DOI:10.3390/v16091398
Christina Diamanti, Lambros Nousis, Petros Bozidis, Michalis Koureas, Maria Kyritsi, George Markozannes, Nikolaos Simantiris, Eirini Panteli, Anastasia Koutsolioutsou, Konstantinos Tsilidis, Christos Hadjichristodoulou, Alexandra Koutsotoli, Eirini Christaki, Dimitrios Alivertis, Aristides Bartzokas, Konstantina Gartzonika, Chrysostomos Dovas, Evangelia Ntzani
{"title":"SARS-CoV-2 的废水监测:两种浓度方法的比较","authors":"Christina Diamanti, Lambros Nousis, Petros Bozidis, Michalis Koureas, Maria Kyritsi, George Markozannes, Nikolaos Simantiris, Eirini Panteli, Anastasia Koutsolioutsou, Konstantinos Tsilidis, Christos Hadjichristodoulou, Alexandra Koutsotoli, Eirini Christaki, Dimitrios Alivertis, Aristides Bartzokas, Konstantina Gartzonika, Chrysostomos Dovas, Evangelia Ntzani","doi":"10.3390/v16091398","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Wastewater surveillance is crucial for the epidemiological monitoring of SARS-CoV-2. Various concentration techniques, such as skimmed milk flocculation (SMF) and polyethylene glycol (PEG) precipitation, are employed to isolate the virus effectively. This study aims to compare these two methods and determine the one with the superior recovery rates. From February to December 2021, 24-h wastewater samples were collected from the Ioannina Wastewater Treatment Plant’s inlet and processed using both techniques. Subsequent viral genome isolation and a real-time RT-qPCR detection of SARS-CoV-2 were performed. The quantitative analysis demonstrated a higher detection sensitivity with a PEG-based concentration than SMF. Moreover, when the samples were positive by both methods, PEG consistently yielded higher viral loads. These findings underscore the need for further research into concentration methodologies and the development of precise protocols to enhance epidemiological surveillance through wastewater analysis.","PeriodicalId":501326,"journal":{"name":"Viruses","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Wastewater Surveillance of SARS-CoV-2: A Comparison of Two Concentration Methods\",\"authors\":\"Christina Diamanti, Lambros Nousis, Petros Bozidis, Michalis Koureas, Maria Kyritsi, George Markozannes, Nikolaos Simantiris, Eirini Panteli, Anastasia Koutsolioutsou, Konstantinos Tsilidis, Christos Hadjichristodoulou, Alexandra Koutsotoli, Eirini Christaki, Dimitrios Alivertis, Aristides Bartzokas, Konstantina Gartzonika, Chrysostomos Dovas, Evangelia Ntzani\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/v16091398\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Wastewater surveillance is crucial for the epidemiological monitoring of SARS-CoV-2. Various concentration techniques, such as skimmed milk flocculation (SMF) and polyethylene glycol (PEG) precipitation, are employed to isolate the virus effectively. This study aims to compare these two methods and determine the one with the superior recovery rates. From February to December 2021, 24-h wastewater samples were collected from the Ioannina Wastewater Treatment Plant’s inlet and processed using both techniques. Subsequent viral genome isolation and a real-time RT-qPCR detection of SARS-CoV-2 were performed. The quantitative analysis demonstrated a higher detection sensitivity with a PEG-based concentration than SMF. Moreover, when the samples were positive by both methods, PEG consistently yielded higher viral loads. These findings underscore the need for further research into concentration methodologies and the development of precise protocols to enhance epidemiological surveillance through wastewater analysis.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501326,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Viruses\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Viruses\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/v16091398\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Viruses","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/v16091398","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

废水监测对 SARS-CoV-2 的流行病学监测至关重要。为了有效地分离病毒,人们采用了各种浓缩技术,如脱脂奶絮凝法(SMF)和聚乙二醇沉淀法(PEG)。本研究旨在对这两种方法进行比较,以确定哪种方法的回收率更高。2021 年 2 月至 12 月,我们从约阿尼纳污水处理厂的进水口采集了 24 小时废水样本,并采用这两种技术进行处理。随后进行了病毒基因组分离和 SARS-CoV-2 的实时 RT-qPCR 检测。定量分析结果表明,与 SMF 相比,基于 PEG 的浓度具有更高的检测灵敏度。此外,当两种方法检测的样本均呈阳性时,PEG 的病毒载量始终较高。这些发现强调了进一步研究浓度方法和制定精确方案的必要性,以便通过废水分析加强流行病学监测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Wastewater Surveillance of SARS-CoV-2: A Comparison of Two Concentration Methods
Wastewater surveillance is crucial for the epidemiological monitoring of SARS-CoV-2. Various concentration techniques, such as skimmed milk flocculation (SMF) and polyethylene glycol (PEG) precipitation, are employed to isolate the virus effectively. This study aims to compare these two methods and determine the one with the superior recovery rates. From February to December 2021, 24-h wastewater samples were collected from the Ioannina Wastewater Treatment Plant’s inlet and processed using both techniques. Subsequent viral genome isolation and a real-time RT-qPCR detection of SARS-CoV-2 were performed. The quantitative analysis demonstrated a higher detection sensitivity with a PEG-based concentration than SMF. Moreover, when the samples were positive by both methods, PEG consistently yielded higher viral loads. These findings underscore the need for further research into concentration methodologies and the development of precise protocols to enhance epidemiological surveillance through wastewater analysis.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信