澳大利亚社区 2 型糖尿病患者代谢功能障碍相关性脂肪肝护理路径:障碍与考虑因素

IF 2 3区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Lucy Gracen, Melanie Aikebuse, Babak Sarraf, Steven M McPhail, Anthony W Russell, James O’Beirne, Katharine M Irvine, Suzanne Williams, Patricia C Valery, Elizabeth E Powell
{"title":"澳大利亚社区 2 型糖尿病患者代谢功能障碍相关性脂肪肝护理路径:障碍与考虑因素","authors":"Lucy Gracen, Melanie Aikebuse, Babak Sarraf, Steven M McPhail, Anthony W Russell, James O’Beirne, Katharine M Irvine, Suzanne Williams, Patricia C Valery, Elizabeth E Powell","doi":"10.2147/ppa.s468705","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<strong>Background:</strong> Although clinical guidelines endorse screening for metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) with advanced fibrosis in people with type 2 diabetes (T2D), the feasibility of and barriers and considerations relevant to implementing this approach in the community remain unclear.<br/><strong>Methods:</strong> Sequential adults with T2D attending selected community clinics during 2021– 2023 were invited to receive a “liver health check” (n=543). A further 95 participants were referred directly from their general practitioner (GP) or self-referred to the study. A total of 302 participants underwent a point of care assessment of hepatic steatosis and stiffness (FibroScan) and were advised to see their GP to discuss the results. “Template” letters containing key results, their interpretation and advice about management of cardiometabolic risk, patient follow-up and referral criteria, were sent to participants’ GPs.<br/><strong>Results:</strong> Referral to a tertiary liver clinic was advised in GP letters for 45 (15%) participants with an increased risk of clinically significant fibrosis (liver stiffness measurement ≥ 8), 15 participants with ‘red flags’ (eg splenomegaly, thrombocytopenia) and 2 with unsuccessful FibroScan examinations. A referral from GPs to the liver clinic was received for 27 (44%) of these 62 participants. Approximately 90% of GPs rated the “template” letters favourably on a Likert rating scale.<br/><strong>Conclusion:</strong> The low rate of participation in the “liver health check” and liver clinic referral reflects a real-world scenario and may stem from societal under-recognition and engagement with MASLD, competing health priorities or under-appreciation of the link between liver fibrosis severity and mortality risk. Further studies need to address strategies to enhance participation in liver health assessments and determine their impact on liver-related morbidity/mortality and overall survival.<br/><br/>","PeriodicalId":19972,"journal":{"name":"Patient preference and adherence","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An Australian Community-Based Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease Care Pathway for People with Type 2 Diabetes: Barriers and Considerations\",\"authors\":\"Lucy Gracen, Melanie Aikebuse, Babak Sarraf, Steven M McPhail, Anthony W Russell, James O’Beirne, Katharine M Irvine, Suzanne Williams, Patricia C Valery, Elizabeth E Powell\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/ppa.s468705\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<strong>Background:</strong> Although clinical guidelines endorse screening for metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) with advanced fibrosis in people with type 2 diabetes (T2D), the feasibility of and barriers and considerations relevant to implementing this approach in the community remain unclear.<br/><strong>Methods:</strong> Sequential adults with T2D attending selected community clinics during 2021– 2023 were invited to receive a “liver health check” (n=543). A further 95 participants were referred directly from their general practitioner (GP) or self-referred to the study. A total of 302 participants underwent a point of care assessment of hepatic steatosis and stiffness (FibroScan) and were advised to see their GP to discuss the results. “Template” letters containing key results, their interpretation and advice about management of cardiometabolic risk, patient follow-up and referral criteria, were sent to participants’ GPs.<br/><strong>Results:</strong> Referral to a tertiary liver clinic was advised in GP letters for 45 (15%) participants with an increased risk of clinically significant fibrosis (liver stiffness measurement ≥ 8), 15 participants with ‘red flags’ (eg splenomegaly, thrombocytopenia) and 2 with unsuccessful FibroScan examinations. A referral from GPs to the liver clinic was received for 27 (44%) of these 62 participants. Approximately 90% of GPs rated the “template” letters favourably on a Likert rating scale.<br/><strong>Conclusion:</strong> The low rate of participation in the “liver health check” and liver clinic referral reflects a real-world scenario and may stem from societal under-recognition and engagement with MASLD, competing health priorities or under-appreciation of the link between liver fibrosis severity and mortality risk. Further studies need to address strategies to enhance participation in liver health assessments and determine their impact on liver-related morbidity/mortality and overall survival.<br/><br/>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19972,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Patient preference and adherence\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Patient preference and adherence\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/ppa.s468705\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Patient preference and adherence","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/ppa.s468705","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:尽管临床指南认可对2型糖尿病(T2D)患者进行伴有晚期纤维化的代谢功能障碍相关性脂肪性肝病(MASLD)筛查,但在社区实施这种方法的可行性、障碍和注意事项仍不清楚:方法:2021-2023年期间,在选定社区诊所就诊的T2D成人患者被邀请接受 "肝脏健康检查"(543人)。另有95名参与者由其全科医生(GP)直接转介或自我转介至本研究。共有 302 名参与者接受了肝脂肪变性和肝硬变(纤维扫描)的护理点评估,并被建议去看全科医生以讨论结果。向参与者的全科医生发送了 "模板 "信件,其中包含主要结果、对结果的解释以及有关心脏代谢风险的管理、患者随访和转诊标准的建议:结果:全科医生信中建议将45名(15%)临床显著纤维化风险增加的参与者(肝脏硬度测量值≥8)、15名出现 "红旗"(如脾脏肿大、血小板减少)的参与者和2名纤维扫描检查不成功的参与者转诊至三级肝脏诊所。在这 62 名参与者中,有 27 人(44%)由全科医生转介到肝病诊所。约 90% 的全科医生对 "模板 "信件给予了好评:参与 "肝脏健康检查 "和肝脏门诊转诊的比例较低,这反映了现实世界中的情况,可能是由于社会对MASLD的认识和参与不足、健康优先事项相互竞争或对肝纤维化严重程度与死亡风险之间的联系认识不足。进一步的研究需要探讨加强参与肝脏健康评估的策略,并确定其对肝脏相关发病率/死亡率和总生存率的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An Australian Community-Based Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease Care Pathway for People with Type 2 Diabetes: Barriers and Considerations
Background: Although clinical guidelines endorse screening for metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) with advanced fibrosis in people with type 2 diabetes (T2D), the feasibility of and barriers and considerations relevant to implementing this approach in the community remain unclear.
Methods: Sequential adults with T2D attending selected community clinics during 2021– 2023 were invited to receive a “liver health check” (n=543). A further 95 participants were referred directly from their general practitioner (GP) or self-referred to the study. A total of 302 participants underwent a point of care assessment of hepatic steatosis and stiffness (FibroScan) and were advised to see their GP to discuss the results. “Template” letters containing key results, their interpretation and advice about management of cardiometabolic risk, patient follow-up and referral criteria, were sent to participants’ GPs.
Results: Referral to a tertiary liver clinic was advised in GP letters for 45 (15%) participants with an increased risk of clinically significant fibrosis (liver stiffness measurement ≥ 8), 15 participants with ‘red flags’ (eg splenomegaly, thrombocytopenia) and 2 with unsuccessful FibroScan examinations. A referral from GPs to the liver clinic was received for 27 (44%) of these 62 participants. Approximately 90% of GPs rated the “template” letters favourably on a Likert rating scale.
Conclusion: The low rate of participation in the “liver health check” and liver clinic referral reflects a real-world scenario and may stem from societal under-recognition and engagement with MASLD, competing health priorities or under-appreciation of the link between liver fibrosis severity and mortality risk. Further studies need to address strategies to enhance participation in liver health assessments and determine their impact on liver-related morbidity/mortality and overall survival.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Patient preference and adherence
Patient preference and adherence MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
4.50%
发文量
354
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Patient Preference and Adherence is an international, peer reviewed, open access journal that focuses on the growing importance of patient preference and adherence throughout the therapeutic continuum. The journal is characterized by the rapid reporting of reviews, original research, modeling and clinical studies across all therapeutic areas. Patient satisfaction, acceptability, quality of life, compliance, persistence and their role in developing new therapeutic modalities and compounds to optimize clinical outcomes for existing disease states are major areas of interest for the journal. As of 1st April 2019, Patient Preference and Adherence will no longer consider meta-analyses for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信