激光活化灌溉对 Guttaflow 生物胶片可回收性的影响(体外研究)

IF 2.5 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Maram Obeid, Mohamed El Sayed Zaghloul, Tariq Yehia Abdelrahman
{"title":"激光活化灌溉对 Guttaflow 生物胶片可回收性的影响(体外研究)","authors":"Maram Obeid, Mohamed El Sayed Zaghloul, Tariq Yehia Abdelrahman","doi":"10.1038/s41405-024-00254-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Background</h3><p>This study aimed to evaluate the efficiency of diode LASER activated irrigation in the removal of GuttaFlow Bioseal root canal filling material during retreatment.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Materials and subjects</h3><p>Root canals of forty-five single-rooted human mandibular premolar teeth were prepared with ProTaper Universal rotary system and obturated with lateral condensation obturation technique using Gutta Percha and Roeko GuttaFlow Bioseal root canal sealer. All specimens were retreated with ProTaper Universal Retreatment System files then divided to three different groups according to the technique of activation of irrigation. Samples were sectioned, and the residual filling remnants were captured using digital camera attached to microscope. Data was collected by three different interpreters, to eliminate the subjectivity of the process, using the ImageJ Software. The mean value of the data was obtained and evaluated statistically. The significance level was set at <i>P</i> ≤ 0.05.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>The remaining filling materials in the canals irrigated with ultrasonic activation (6.17 ± 1.42 at coronal level, 10.93 ± 1.91at middle level, and 14.58 ± 2.23 at apical level) were less than these irrigated with LASER activation (15.87 ± 3.78 at coronal level, 21.28 ± 4.44 at middle level, and 27.06 ± 2.68 at apical level). Maximum amount of remaining filling materials was present in the canals irrigated with passive side-vented syringe (23.07 ± 3.22 at coronal level, 38.09 ± 7.27 at middle level, and 34.24 ± 9.77 at apical level).</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusion</h3><p>The activation of irrigation techniques used were incapable of complete removal of filling material at root canal walls.</p>","PeriodicalId":36997,"journal":{"name":"BDJ Open","volume":"13 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of LASER activated irrigation on the retrievability of Guttaflow bioseal (in-vitro study)\",\"authors\":\"Maram Obeid, Mohamed El Sayed Zaghloul, Tariq Yehia Abdelrahman\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41405-024-00254-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Background</h3><p>This study aimed to evaluate the efficiency of diode LASER activated irrigation in the removal of GuttaFlow Bioseal root canal filling material during retreatment.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Materials and subjects</h3><p>Root canals of forty-five single-rooted human mandibular premolar teeth were prepared with ProTaper Universal rotary system and obturated with lateral condensation obturation technique using Gutta Percha and Roeko GuttaFlow Bioseal root canal sealer. All specimens were retreated with ProTaper Universal Retreatment System files then divided to three different groups according to the technique of activation of irrigation. Samples were sectioned, and the residual filling remnants were captured using digital camera attached to microscope. Data was collected by three different interpreters, to eliminate the subjectivity of the process, using the ImageJ Software. The mean value of the data was obtained and evaluated statistically. The significance level was set at <i>P</i> ≤ 0.05.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Results</h3><p>The remaining filling materials in the canals irrigated with ultrasonic activation (6.17 ± 1.42 at coronal level, 10.93 ± 1.91at middle level, and 14.58 ± 2.23 at apical level) were less than these irrigated with LASER activation (15.87 ± 3.78 at coronal level, 21.28 ± 4.44 at middle level, and 27.06 ± 2.68 at apical level). Maximum amount of remaining filling materials was present in the canals irrigated with passive side-vented syringe (23.07 ± 3.22 at coronal level, 38.09 ± 7.27 at middle level, and 34.24 ± 9.77 at apical level).</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Conclusion</h3><p>The activation of irrigation techniques used were incapable of complete removal of filling material at root canal walls.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36997,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BDJ Open\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BDJ Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41405-024-00254-z\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BDJ Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41405-024-00254-z","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

材料和受试者用 ProTaper 通用旋转系统对 45 颗单根人类下颌前磨牙的根管进行预备,并用 Gutta Percha 和 Roeko GuttaFlow Bioseal 根管封闭剂采用侧向冷凝封闭技术进行封闭。使用 ProTaper 通用再治疗系统锉对所有样本进行再治疗,然后根据冲洗激活技术将样本分为三组。对样本进行切片,并使用连接到显微镜上的数码相机拍摄残余填充物。数据由三位不同的解释者使用 ImageJ 软件收集,以消除过程中的主观性。获得数据的平均值并进行统计评估。结果超声波激活灌洗的牙槽中剩余的填充材料(冠水平为 6.17 ± 1.42,中水平为 10.93 ± 1.91,根尖水平为 14.58 ± 2.23)少于激光激活灌洗的牙槽中(冠水平为 15.87 ± 3.78,中水平为 21.28 ± 4.44,根尖水平为 27.06 ± 2.68)。使用被动式侧排气注射器灌洗的根管中残留的充填材料最多(冠水平为 23.07 ± 3.22,中水平为 38.09 ± 7.27,根尖水平为 34.24 ± 9.77)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Impact of LASER activated irrigation on the retrievability of Guttaflow bioseal (in-vitro study)

Impact of LASER activated irrigation on the retrievability of Guttaflow bioseal (in-vitro study)

Background

This study aimed to evaluate the efficiency of diode LASER activated irrigation in the removal of GuttaFlow Bioseal root canal filling material during retreatment.

Materials and subjects

Root canals of forty-five single-rooted human mandibular premolar teeth were prepared with ProTaper Universal rotary system and obturated with lateral condensation obturation technique using Gutta Percha and Roeko GuttaFlow Bioseal root canal sealer. All specimens were retreated with ProTaper Universal Retreatment System files then divided to three different groups according to the technique of activation of irrigation. Samples were sectioned, and the residual filling remnants were captured using digital camera attached to microscope. Data was collected by three different interpreters, to eliminate the subjectivity of the process, using the ImageJ Software. The mean value of the data was obtained and evaluated statistically. The significance level was set at P ≤ 0.05.

Results

The remaining filling materials in the canals irrigated with ultrasonic activation (6.17 ± 1.42 at coronal level, 10.93 ± 1.91at middle level, and 14.58 ± 2.23 at apical level) were less than these irrigated with LASER activation (15.87 ± 3.78 at coronal level, 21.28 ± 4.44 at middle level, and 27.06 ± 2.68 at apical level). Maximum amount of remaining filling materials was present in the canals irrigated with passive side-vented syringe (23.07 ± 3.22 at coronal level, 38.09 ± 7.27 at middle level, and 34.24 ± 9.77 at apical level).

Conclusion

The activation of irrigation techniques used were incapable of complete removal of filling material at root canal walls.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BDJ Open
BDJ Open Dentistry-Dentistry (all)
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
3.30%
发文量
34
审稿时长
30 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信