基于效用的生物识别样本质量测量性能评估

IF 2.4 4区 计算机科学
Olaf Henniger, Biying Fu, Alexander Kurz
{"title":"基于效用的生物识别样本质量测量性能评估","authors":"Olaf Henniger, Biying Fu, Alexander Kurz","doi":"10.1186/s13640-024-00644-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The quality score of a biometric sample is intended to predict the sample’s degree of utility for biometric recognition. Different authors proposed different definitions for utility. A harmonized definition of utility would be useful to facilitate the comparison of biometric sample quality assessment algorithms. In this article, we compare different definitions of utility and apply them to both face image and fingerprint image data sets containing multiple samples per biometric instance and covering a wide range of potential quality issues. The results differ only slightly. We show that discarding samples with low utility scores results in rapidly declining false non-match rates. The obtained utility scores can be used as target labels for training biometric sample quality assessment algorithms and as baseline when summarizing utility-prediction performance in a single plot or even in a single figure of merit.</p>","PeriodicalId":49322,"journal":{"name":"Eurasip Journal on Image and Video Processing","volume":"25 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Utility-based performance evaluation of biometric sample quality measures\",\"authors\":\"Olaf Henniger, Biying Fu, Alexander Kurz\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13640-024-00644-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The quality score of a biometric sample is intended to predict the sample’s degree of utility for biometric recognition. Different authors proposed different definitions for utility. A harmonized definition of utility would be useful to facilitate the comparison of biometric sample quality assessment algorithms. In this article, we compare different definitions of utility and apply them to both face image and fingerprint image data sets containing multiple samples per biometric instance and covering a wide range of potential quality issues. The results differ only slightly. We show that discarding samples with low utility scores results in rapidly declining false non-match rates. The obtained utility scores can be used as target labels for training biometric sample quality assessment algorithms and as baseline when summarizing utility-prediction performance in a single plot or even in a single figure of merit.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49322,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Eurasip Journal on Image and Video Processing\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Eurasip Journal on Image and Video Processing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13640-024-00644-1\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Eurasip Journal on Image and Video Processing","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13640-024-00644-1","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

生物识别样本的质量得分旨在预测样本在生物识别中的实用程度。不同的作者提出了不同的实用性定义。一个统一的实用性定义将有助于生物识别样本质量评估算法的比较。在本文中,我们比较了不同的效用定义,并将其应用于人脸图像和指纹图像数据集,这些数据集包含每个生物识别实例的多个样本,并涵盖各种潜在的质量问题。结果仅略有不同。我们发现,舍弃效用分数低的样本会导致错误非匹配率迅速下降。所获得的效用分数可用作训练生物识别样本质量评估算法的目标标签,也可用作在单幅图甚至单个优点图中总结效用预测性能的基线。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Utility-based performance evaluation of biometric sample quality measures

Utility-based performance evaluation of biometric sample quality measures

The quality score of a biometric sample is intended to predict the sample’s degree of utility for biometric recognition. Different authors proposed different definitions for utility. A harmonized definition of utility would be useful to facilitate the comparison of biometric sample quality assessment algorithms. In this article, we compare different definitions of utility and apply them to both face image and fingerprint image data sets containing multiple samples per biometric instance and covering a wide range of potential quality issues. The results differ only slightly. We show that discarding samples with low utility scores results in rapidly declining false non-match rates. The obtained utility scores can be used as target labels for training biometric sample quality assessment algorithms and as baseline when summarizing utility-prediction performance in a single plot or even in a single figure of merit.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Eurasip Journal on Image and Video Processing
Eurasip Journal on Image and Video Processing Engineering-Electrical and Electronic Engineering
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
审稿时长
6.8 months
期刊介绍: EURASIP Journal on Image and Video Processing is intended for researchers from both academia and industry, who are active in the multidisciplinary field of image and video processing. The scope of the journal covers all theoretical and practical aspects of the domain, from basic research to development of application.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信