{"title":"基于效用的生物识别样本质量测量性能评估","authors":"Olaf Henniger, Biying Fu, Alexander Kurz","doi":"10.1186/s13640-024-00644-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The quality score of a biometric sample is intended to predict the sample’s degree of utility for biometric recognition. Different authors proposed different definitions for utility. A harmonized definition of utility would be useful to facilitate the comparison of biometric sample quality assessment algorithms. In this article, we compare different definitions of utility and apply them to both face image and fingerprint image data sets containing multiple samples per biometric instance and covering a wide range of potential quality issues. The results differ only slightly. We show that discarding samples with low utility scores results in rapidly declining false non-match rates. The obtained utility scores can be used as target labels for training biometric sample quality assessment algorithms and as baseline when summarizing utility-prediction performance in a single plot or even in a single figure of merit.</p>","PeriodicalId":49322,"journal":{"name":"Eurasip Journal on Image and Video Processing","volume":"25 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Utility-based performance evaluation of biometric sample quality measures\",\"authors\":\"Olaf Henniger, Biying Fu, Alexander Kurz\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13640-024-00644-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The quality score of a biometric sample is intended to predict the sample’s degree of utility for biometric recognition. Different authors proposed different definitions for utility. A harmonized definition of utility would be useful to facilitate the comparison of biometric sample quality assessment algorithms. In this article, we compare different definitions of utility and apply them to both face image and fingerprint image data sets containing multiple samples per biometric instance and covering a wide range of potential quality issues. The results differ only slightly. We show that discarding samples with low utility scores results in rapidly declining false non-match rates. The obtained utility scores can be used as target labels for training biometric sample quality assessment algorithms and as baseline when summarizing utility-prediction performance in a single plot or even in a single figure of merit.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49322,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Eurasip Journal on Image and Video Processing\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Eurasip Journal on Image and Video Processing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13640-024-00644-1\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Eurasip Journal on Image and Video Processing","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13640-024-00644-1","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Utility-based performance evaluation of biometric sample quality measures
The quality score of a biometric sample is intended to predict the sample’s degree of utility for biometric recognition. Different authors proposed different definitions for utility. A harmonized definition of utility would be useful to facilitate the comparison of biometric sample quality assessment algorithms. In this article, we compare different definitions of utility and apply them to both face image and fingerprint image data sets containing multiple samples per biometric instance and covering a wide range of potential quality issues. The results differ only slightly. We show that discarding samples with low utility scores results in rapidly declining false non-match rates. The obtained utility scores can be used as target labels for training biometric sample quality assessment algorithms and as baseline when summarizing utility-prediction performance in a single plot or even in a single figure of merit.
期刊介绍:
EURASIP Journal on Image and Video Processing is intended for researchers from both academia and industry, who are active in the multidisciplinary field of image and video processing. The scope of the journal covers all theoretical and practical aspects of the domain, from basic research to development of application.