关于企业调查中商业环境认知稳定性的实验

IF 1 4区 经济学 Q3 ECONOMICS
Asif M. Islam, Jorge Rodriguez Meza
{"title":"关于企业调查中商业环境认知稳定性的实验","authors":"Asif M. Islam, Jorge Rodriguez Meza","doi":"10.1111/ecot.12434","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Perception‐based survey questions have been widely employed to evaluate the business environment. In the World Bank Enterprise Surveys, such questions involve rating an element of the business environment at the end of each section of the survey instrument. They often elicit responses inconsistent with similar questions based on the firm's experience over a specific timeframe. In this study, an experiment is analysed that randomizes the placement order of the perception‐based questions either at the end of a section or at the beginning of the survey. Significant question‐order effects are uncovered for perceptions of corruption (9%–13% point) and business licencing and permits (7%–8% point) but not the other elements after accounting for a variety of factors; there are no questions‐order effects for experience‐based questions. The study recommends that analyses in these two areas validate perception‐based questions with corresponding experience‐based questions. This adds to a larger literature that emphasizes the importance of data quality and its far‐reaching economic benefits especially in guiding policy.","PeriodicalId":40265,"journal":{"name":"Economics of Transition and Institutional Change","volume":"98 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An experiment on the stability of business environment perceptions in a firm survey\",\"authors\":\"Asif M. Islam, Jorge Rodriguez Meza\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ecot.12434\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Perception‐based survey questions have been widely employed to evaluate the business environment. In the World Bank Enterprise Surveys, such questions involve rating an element of the business environment at the end of each section of the survey instrument. They often elicit responses inconsistent with similar questions based on the firm's experience over a specific timeframe. In this study, an experiment is analysed that randomizes the placement order of the perception‐based questions either at the end of a section or at the beginning of the survey. Significant question‐order effects are uncovered for perceptions of corruption (9%–13% point) and business licencing and permits (7%–8% point) but not the other elements after accounting for a variety of factors; there are no questions‐order effects for experience‐based questions. The study recommends that analyses in these two areas validate perception‐based questions with corresponding experience‐based questions. This adds to a larger literature that emphasizes the importance of data quality and its far‐reaching economic benefits especially in guiding policy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":40265,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Economics of Transition and Institutional Change\",\"volume\":\"98 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Economics of Transition and Institutional Change\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/ecot.12434\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economics of Transition and Institutional Change","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ecot.12434","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

基于感知的调查问题已被广泛用于评估商业环境。在世界银行企业调查中,这类问题涉及在调查工具每个部分的末尾对商业环境的一个要素进行评分。根据企业在特定时间段内的经验,这些问题往往会引出与类似问题不一致的回答。在本研究中,我们对一项实验进行了分析,该实验随机调整了基于感知的问题的排列顺序,既可以将其放在某一部分的末尾,也可以将其放在调查的开头。在考虑了各种因素后,发现对腐败的看法(9%-13% 分)和对商业执照和许可证的看法(7%-8% 分)有显著的问题顺序效应,但对其他要素则没有;对基于经验的问题则没有问题顺序效应。研究建议在这两个领域进行分析,用相应的基于经验的问题来验证基于感知的问题。更多文献强调了数据质量的重要性及其深远的经济效益,尤其是在指导政策方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An experiment on the stability of business environment perceptions in a firm survey
Perception‐based survey questions have been widely employed to evaluate the business environment. In the World Bank Enterprise Surveys, such questions involve rating an element of the business environment at the end of each section of the survey instrument. They often elicit responses inconsistent with similar questions based on the firm's experience over a specific timeframe. In this study, an experiment is analysed that randomizes the placement order of the perception‐based questions either at the end of a section or at the beginning of the survey. Significant question‐order effects are uncovered for perceptions of corruption (9%–13% point) and business licencing and permits (7%–8% point) but not the other elements after accounting for a variety of factors; there are no questions‐order effects for experience‐based questions. The study recommends that analyses in these two areas validate perception‐based questions with corresponding experience‐based questions. This adds to a larger literature that emphasizes the importance of data quality and its far‐reaching economic benefits especially in guiding policy.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
11.10%
发文量
32
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信