J. Ulpiano Vázquez-Martínez, Javier Morales-Mediano, Antonio L. Leal-Rodríguez, Carla Pennano-Villanueva
{"title":"驾驭风暴:管理者的决策如何塑造危机中的公司","authors":"J. Ulpiano Vázquez-Martínez, Javier Morales-Mediano, Antonio L. Leal-Rodríguez, Carla Pennano-Villanueva","doi":"10.1007/s11846-024-00801-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This research aims to examine how managers responded and behaved in the highly chaotic environment generated by the COVID-19 crisis. Understanding their response is important because each decision taken impacted differently and significantly on their companies’ performance. The first part of the study uses topic modeling to interprets text from 113 interviews with executives published in general media. The second part analyzes responses from 518 managers across 15 countries using PLS-SEM. The survey was conducted during the most severe stage of the pandemic (2020), ensuring real-time opinions from managers rather than relying on recollections. The study’s main finding reveals that managers made strategic/operational and financial decisions, which helped companies adapt and survive in this new environment. However, they had a negative effect on firm performance. These findings delineate significant theoretical implications for managerial decision-making amidst chaotic contexts, as well as guiding practitioners in facing future crises.</p>","PeriodicalId":20992,"journal":{"name":"Review of Managerial Science","volume":"18 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Navigating the storm: how managers’ decisions shape companies in crisis\",\"authors\":\"J. Ulpiano Vázquez-Martínez, Javier Morales-Mediano, Antonio L. Leal-Rodríguez, Carla Pennano-Villanueva\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11846-024-00801-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>This research aims to examine how managers responded and behaved in the highly chaotic environment generated by the COVID-19 crisis. Understanding their response is important because each decision taken impacted differently and significantly on their companies’ performance. The first part of the study uses topic modeling to interprets text from 113 interviews with executives published in general media. The second part analyzes responses from 518 managers across 15 countries using PLS-SEM. The survey was conducted during the most severe stage of the pandemic (2020), ensuring real-time opinions from managers rather than relying on recollections. The study’s main finding reveals that managers made strategic/operational and financial decisions, which helped companies adapt and survive in this new environment. However, they had a negative effect on firm performance. These findings delineate significant theoretical implications for managerial decision-making amidst chaotic contexts, as well as guiding practitioners in facing future crises.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20992,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Review of Managerial Science\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Review of Managerial Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-024-00801-w\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Review of Managerial Science","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-024-00801-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
Navigating the storm: how managers’ decisions shape companies in crisis
This research aims to examine how managers responded and behaved in the highly chaotic environment generated by the COVID-19 crisis. Understanding their response is important because each decision taken impacted differently and significantly on their companies’ performance. The first part of the study uses topic modeling to interprets text from 113 interviews with executives published in general media. The second part analyzes responses from 518 managers across 15 countries using PLS-SEM. The survey was conducted during the most severe stage of the pandemic (2020), ensuring real-time opinions from managers rather than relying on recollections. The study’s main finding reveals that managers made strategic/operational and financial decisions, which helped companies adapt and survive in this new environment. However, they had a negative effect on firm performance. These findings delineate significant theoretical implications for managerial decision-making amidst chaotic contexts, as well as guiding practitioners in facing future crises.
期刊介绍:
Review of Managerial Science (RMS) provides a forum for innovative research from all scientific areas of business administration. The journal publishes original research of high quality and is open to various methodological approaches (analytical modeling, empirical research, experimental work, methodological reasoning etc.). The scope of RMS encompasses – but is not limited to – accounting, auditing, banking, business strategy, corporate governance, entrepreneurship, financial structure and capital markets, health economics, human resources management, information systems, innovation management, insurance, marketing, organization, production and logistics, risk management and taxation. RMS also encourages the submission of papers combining ideas and/or approaches from different areas in an innovative way. Review papers presenting the state of the art of a research area and pointing out new directions for further research are also welcome. The scientific standards of RMS are guaranteed by a rigorous, double-blind peer review process with ad hoc referees and the journal´s internationally composed editorial board.