内窥镜辅助传统手术与传统手术治疗鼻窦恶性黑色素瘤的疗效分析

Xuezhong Dai,Xia Er,Yang Zhou,Liming Cui,Liping Li
{"title":"内窥镜辅助传统手术与传统手术治疗鼻窦恶性黑色素瘤的疗效分析","authors":"Xuezhong Dai,Xia Er,Yang Zhou,Liming Cui,Liping Li","doi":"10.1177/01455613241272644","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Object: To analyze the effect of traditional surgery and endoscope-assisted traditional surgery on patients with sinonasal malignant melanoma (SMM), and to explore the effective treatment of SMM. Methods: The clinicopathological data and surgical methods of 47 patients with SMM, diagnosed in the Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery at the Third People's Hospital of Yunnan Province from October 2000 to June 2020, were retrospectively analyzed. Among them, 26 cases were treated with traditional surgery, and 21 cases were treated with endoscope-assisted traditional surgery. The 3 and 5 year local recurrence and survival rates were monitored and compared. Results: The 3 year local recurrence rate was compared between the 2 groups: χ2 = 5.4558, P = .020 (P < .05), the endoscope-assisted traditional surgery group had a lower 3 year local recurrence rate. The 3 year survival rate was compared between the 2 groups: χ2 = 1.0231, P = .312 (P > .05), the difference in 3 year survival was not significant between the 2 groups. The 5 year local recurrence rate was compared between the 2 groups: χ2 = 4.4052, P = .036 (P < .05), the endoscope-assisted traditional surgery group had a lower 5 year local recurrence rate. The 5 year survival rate was compared between the 2 groups: χ2 = 4.3085, P = .038 (P < .05), the endoscope-assisted traditional surgery group had a higher 5 year survival rate. Therefore, there were significant differences in the local recurrence rates at 3 and 5 years, as well as the 5 year survival rate, between endoscope-assisted traditional surgery and traditional surgery in the treatment of SMM. Conclusion: Endoscope-assisted traditional surgery can remove local lesions of SMM more completely, reduce the local recurrence rate, and improve the 5 year survival rate of patients.","PeriodicalId":93984,"journal":{"name":"Ear, nose, & throat journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy Analysis of Endoscopic-Assisted Traditional Surgery and Traditional Surgery for Sinonasal Malignant Melanoma.\",\"authors\":\"Xuezhong Dai,Xia Er,Yang Zhou,Liming Cui,Liping Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/01455613241272644\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Object: To analyze the effect of traditional surgery and endoscope-assisted traditional surgery on patients with sinonasal malignant melanoma (SMM), and to explore the effective treatment of SMM. Methods: The clinicopathological data and surgical methods of 47 patients with SMM, diagnosed in the Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery at the Third People's Hospital of Yunnan Province from October 2000 to June 2020, were retrospectively analyzed. Among them, 26 cases were treated with traditional surgery, and 21 cases were treated with endoscope-assisted traditional surgery. The 3 and 5 year local recurrence and survival rates were monitored and compared. Results: The 3 year local recurrence rate was compared between the 2 groups: χ2 = 5.4558, P = .020 (P < .05), the endoscope-assisted traditional surgery group had a lower 3 year local recurrence rate. The 3 year survival rate was compared between the 2 groups: χ2 = 1.0231, P = .312 (P > .05), the difference in 3 year survival was not significant between the 2 groups. The 5 year local recurrence rate was compared between the 2 groups: χ2 = 4.4052, P = .036 (P < .05), the endoscope-assisted traditional surgery group had a lower 5 year local recurrence rate. The 5 year survival rate was compared between the 2 groups: χ2 = 4.3085, P = .038 (P < .05), the endoscope-assisted traditional surgery group had a higher 5 year survival rate. Therefore, there were significant differences in the local recurrence rates at 3 and 5 years, as well as the 5 year survival rate, between endoscope-assisted traditional surgery and traditional surgery in the treatment of SMM. Conclusion: Endoscope-assisted traditional surgery can remove local lesions of SMM more completely, reduce the local recurrence rate, and improve the 5 year survival rate of patients.\",\"PeriodicalId\":93984,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ear, nose, & throat journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ear, nose, & throat journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"0\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/01455613241272644\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ear, nose, & throat journal","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/01455613241272644","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究目的分析传统手术和内窥镜辅助传统手术对鼻窦恶性黑色素瘤(SMM)患者的治疗效果,探讨SMM的有效治疗方法。方法回顾性分析2000年10月至2020年6月在云南省第三人民医院耳鼻咽喉头颈外科确诊的47例SMM患者的临床病理资料和手术方法。其中,26 例采用传统手术治疗,21 例采用内窥镜辅助传统手术治疗。对3年和5年的局部复发率和生存率进行了监测和比较。结果显示两组 3 年局部复发率比较:χ2 = 5.4558,P = .020 (P < .05),内镜辅助传统手术组 3 年局部复发率较低。两组 3 年生存率比较:χ2 = 1.0231,P = .312 (P > .05),两组 3 年生存率差异无显著性。两组 5 年局部复发率比较:χ2 = 4.4052,P = .036 (P < .05),内镜辅助传统手术组 5 年局部复发率较低。两组患者的 5 年生存率比较:χ2 = 4.3085,P = .038(P < .05),内镜辅助传统手术组的 5 年生存率更高。因此,内镜辅助传统手术与传统手术治疗 SMM 的 3 年和 5 年局部复发率以及 5 年生存率存在显著差异。结论内镜辅助传统手术能更彻底地切除SMM的局部病灶,降低局部复发率,提高患者的5年生存率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Efficacy Analysis of Endoscopic-Assisted Traditional Surgery and Traditional Surgery for Sinonasal Malignant Melanoma.
Object: To analyze the effect of traditional surgery and endoscope-assisted traditional surgery on patients with sinonasal malignant melanoma (SMM), and to explore the effective treatment of SMM. Methods: The clinicopathological data and surgical methods of 47 patients with SMM, diagnosed in the Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery at the Third People's Hospital of Yunnan Province from October 2000 to June 2020, were retrospectively analyzed. Among them, 26 cases were treated with traditional surgery, and 21 cases were treated with endoscope-assisted traditional surgery. The 3 and 5 year local recurrence and survival rates were monitored and compared. Results: The 3 year local recurrence rate was compared between the 2 groups: χ2 = 5.4558, P = .020 (P < .05), the endoscope-assisted traditional surgery group had a lower 3 year local recurrence rate. The 3 year survival rate was compared between the 2 groups: χ2 = 1.0231, P = .312 (P > .05), the difference in 3 year survival was not significant between the 2 groups. The 5 year local recurrence rate was compared between the 2 groups: χ2 = 4.4052, P = .036 (P < .05), the endoscope-assisted traditional surgery group had a lower 5 year local recurrence rate. The 5 year survival rate was compared between the 2 groups: χ2 = 4.3085, P = .038 (P < .05), the endoscope-assisted traditional surgery group had a higher 5 year survival rate. Therefore, there were significant differences in the local recurrence rates at 3 and 5 years, as well as the 5 year survival rate, between endoscope-assisted traditional surgery and traditional surgery in the treatment of SMM. Conclusion: Endoscope-assisted traditional surgery can remove local lesions of SMM more completely, reduce the local recurrence rate, and improve the 5 year survival rate of patients.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信