田纳西州推杆果岭根区的有机物和养分含量

IF 2 3区 农林科学 Q2 AGRONOMY
Maureen M. Kahiu, Micah S. Woods, Jordan C. Booth, Brandon J. Horvath, James T. Brosnan
{"title":"田纳西州推杆果岭根区的有机物和养分含量","authors":"Maureen M. Kahiu,&nbsp;Micah S. Woods,&nbsp;Jordan C. Booth,&nbsp;Brandon J. Horvath,&nbsp;James T. Brosnan","doi":"10.1002/agj2.21675","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Organic matter and soil nutrient accumulation within putting green root zones affects surface quality and performance. Research was conducted to explore differences in organic matter and nutrient content within creeping bentgrass (CBG; <i>Agrostis stolonifera</i> L.) and ultradwarf bermudagrass [UDBG; <i>C. dactylon</i> (L.) Pers. × <i>C. transvaalensis</i> Burtt-Davy] putting greens. Sampling was conducted from January 30 to February 23, 2023, on 22 putting greens (11 CBG and 11 UDBG) in Tennessee. Forty cores (1.91-cm diameter by 10-cm depth) were randomly collected from each putting green and analyzed for total organic material (TOM; undisturbed cores) by profile depth (0–2 cm, 2–4 cm, and 4–6 cm), TOM throughout a 10-cm core, soil organic matter (SOM; passed through sieve with 2 mm openings) throughout a 10-cm core, and nutrient content. All organic matter measurements were determined via loss-on-ignition (LOI) testing, whereas nutrient content was determined by Mehlich-3 extraction. LOI testing at 440°C resulted in greater TOM values than 360°C; however, values from both temperatures were closely related (<i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.99). TOM values from UDBG greens were greater than those recorded on CBG at all profile depths. Greens established via no-till conversion contained more TOM than those planted in a constructed sand-matrix root zone. While TOM and SOM were associated (<i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.62), removing verdure for SOM assessments reduced the amount of organic material in each sample by 38% and increased variability. Nutrient contents were lower than sufficiency level of available nutrients benchmarks but exceeded minimum levels for sustainable nutrition.</p>","PeriodicalId":7522,"journal":{"name":"Agronomy Journal","volume":"116 6","pages":"2862-2871"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/agj2.21675","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Organic matter and nutrient content within putting green root zones in Tennessee\",\"authors\":\"Maureen M. Kahiu,&nbsp;Micah S. Woods,&nbsp;Jordan C. Booth,&nbsp;Brandon J. Horvath,&nbsp;James T. Brosnan\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/agj2.21675\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Organic matter and soil nutrient accumulation within putting green root zones affects surface quality and performance. Research was conducted to explore differences in organic matter and nutrient content within creeping bentgrass (CBG; <i>Agrostis stolonifera</i> L.) and ultradwarf bermudagrass [UDBG; <i>C. dactylon</i> (L.) Pers. × <i>C. transvaalensis</i> Burtt-Davy] putting greens. Sampling was conducted from January 30 to February 23, 2023, on 22 putting greens (11 CBG and 11 UDBG) in Tennessee. Forty cores (1.91-cm diameter by 10-cm depth) were randomly collected from each putting green and analyzed for total organic material (TOM; undisturbed cores) by profile depth (0–2 cm, 2–4 cm, and 4–6 cm), TOM throughout a 10-cm core, soil organic matter (SOM; passed through sieve with 2 mm openings) throughout a 10-cm core, and nutrient content. All organic matter measurements were determined via loss-on-ignition (LOI) testing, whereas nutrient content was determined by Mehlich-3 extraction. LOI testing at 440°C resulted in greater TOM values than 360°C; however, values from both temperatures were closely related (<i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.99). TOM values from UDBG greens were greater than those recorded on CBG at all profile depths. Greens established via no-till conversion contained more TOM than those planted in a constructed sand-matrix root zone. While TOM and SOM were associated (<i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.62), removing verdure for SOM assessments reduced the amount of organic material in each sample by 38% and increased variability. Nutrient contents were lower than sufficiency level of available nutrients benchmarks but exceeded minimum levels for sustainable nutrition.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7522,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Agronomy Journal\",\"volume\":\"116 6\",\"pages\":\"2862-2871\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/agj2.21675\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Agronomy Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/agj2.21675\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRONOMY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agronomy Journal","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/agj2.21675","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

推杆果岭根区的有机物和土壤养分积累会影响表面质量和性能。研究旨在探索匍匐翦股颖(CBG;Agrostis stolonifera L.)和超矮百慕大草[UDBG;C. dactylon (L.) Pers. × C. transvaalensis Burtt-Davy]果岭内有机质和养分含量的差异。采样工作于 2023 年 1 月 30 日至 2 月 23 日在田纳西州的 22 个果岭上进行(11 个 CBG 和 11 个 UDBG)。在每个果岭上随机采集了 40 个岩芯(直径 1.91 厘米,深度 10 厘米),并按剖面深度(0-2 厘米、2-4 厘米和 4-6 厘米)分析了总有机物(TOM;未扰动岩芯)、整个 10 厘米岩芯的总有机物、整个 10 厘米岩芯的土壤有机质(SOM;通过开口为 2 毫米的筛子)以及养分含量。所有有机质测量值都是通过点火损失(LOI)测试确定的,而养分含量则是通过 Mehlich-3 萃取法确定的。440°C 的 LOI 测试得出的 TOM 值要高于 360°C;不过,两种温度下的 TOM 值关系密切(R2 = 0.99)。在所有剖面深度上,UDBG 油菜的 TOM 值都大于 CBG 油菜的 TOM 值。通过免耕法种植的果岭比在沙基质根区种植的果岭含有更多的 TOM。虽然 TOM 与 SOM 相关(R2 = 0.62),但在 SOM 评估中去除绿化带会使每个样本中的有机物含量减少 38%,并增加变异性。养分含量低于可用养分的充足水平基准,但超过了可持续营养的最低水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Organic matter and nutrient content within putting green root zones in Tennessee

Organic matter and nutrient content within putting green root zones in Tennessee

Organic matter and soil nutrient accumulation within putting green root zones affects surface quality and performance. Research was conducted to explore differences in organic matter and nutrient content within creeping bentgrass (CBG; Agrostis stolonifera L.) and ultradwarf bermudagrass [UDBG; C. dactylon (L.) Pers. × C. transvaalensis Burtt-Davy] putting greens. Sampling was conducted from January 30 to February 23, 2023, on 22 putting greens (11 CBG and 11 UDBG) in Tennessee. Forty cores (1.91-cm diameter by 10-cm depth) were randomly collected from each putting green and analyzed for total organic material (TOM; undisturbed cores) by profile depth (0–2 cm, 2–4 cm, and 4–6 cm), TOM throughout a 10-cm core, soil organic matter (SOM; passed through sieve with 2 mm openings) throughout a 10-cm core, and nutrient content. All organic matter measurements were determined via loss-on-ignition (LOI) testing, whereas nutrient content was determined by Mehlich-3 extraction. LOI testing at 440°C resulted in greater TOM values than 360°C; however, values from both temperatures were closely related (R2 = 0.99). TOM values from UDBG greens were greater than those recorded on CBG at all profile depths. Greens established via no-till conversion contained more TOM than those planted in a constructed sand-matrix root zone. While TOM and SOM were associated (R2 = 0.62), removing verdure for SOM assessments reduced the amount of organic material in each sample by 38% and increased variability. Nutrient contents were lower than sufficiency level of available nutrients benchmarks but exceeded minimum levels for sustainable nutrition.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Agronomy Journal
Agronomy Journal 农林科学-农艺学
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
9.50%
发文量
265
审稿时长
4.8 months
期刊介绍: After critical review and approval by the editorial board, AJ publishes articles reporting research findings in soil–plant relationships; crop science; soil science; biometry; crop, soil, pasture, and range management; crop, forage, and pasture production and utilization; turfgrass; agroclimatology; agronomic models; integrated pest management; integrated agricultural systems; and various aspects of entomology, weed science, animal science, plant pathology, and agricultural economics as applied to production agriculture. Notes are published about apparatus, observations, and experimental techniques. Observations usually are limited to studies and reports of unrepeatable phenomena or other unique circumstances. Review and interpretation papers are also published, subject to standard review. Contributions to the Forum section deal with current agronomic issues and questions in brief, thought-provoking form. Such papers are reviewed by the editor in consultation with the editorial board.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信