(p,n) 反应的不确定性量化

IF 3.1 2区 物理与天体物理 Q1 Physics and Astronomy
A. J. Smith, C. Hebborn, F. M. Nunes, R. G. T. Zegers
{"title":"(p,n) 反应的不确定性量化","authors":"A. J. Smith, C. Hebborn, F. M. Nunes, R. G. T. Zegers","doi":"10.1103/physrevc.110.034602","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Charge-exchange reactions are versatile probes for nuclear structure. In particular, when populating isobaric analog states, these reactions are used to study isovector nuclear densities and neutron skins. The quality of the information extracted from charge-exchange data depends on the accuracy of the reaction models and their inputs; this work addresses these two points. First, we quantify the uncertainties due to effective nucleon-nucleus interactions by propagating the parameter posterior distributions of the recent global optical model KDUQ [C. D. Pruitt, J. E. Escher, and R. Rahman, <span>Phys. Rev. C</span> <b>107</b>, 014602 (2023)] to <math xmlns=\"http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML\"><mrow><mo>(</mo><mi>p</mi><mo>,</mo><mi>n</mi><mo>)</mo></mrow></math> reaction observables populating the isobaric analog state, at beam energies in the range of 25–160 MeV. Our analysis, focusing on <math xmlns=\"http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML\"><mmultiscripts><mi>Ca</mi><mprescripts></mprescripts><none></none><mn>48</mn></mmultiscripts></math>, shows that the total parametric uncertainties on the cross sections are around 60–100%. The source of this uncertainty is mainly the transition operator as the uncertainties from the distorted waves alone are less than about 15%. Second, we perform a comparison between two- and three-body models that both describe the dynamics of the reaction within the DWBA. The predictions from these two models are similar and generally agree with the available data, suggesting that one-step DWBA is sufficient to describe the reaction process. Only at a beam energy of 25 MeV are there possible signs that a one-step assumption is not fully correct. This work provides motivation for the quantification of uncertainties associated with the transition operator in three-body model. It also suggests that further constraint of the optical potential parameters is needed for increased model precision.","PeriodicalId":20122,"journal":{"name":"Physical Review C","volume":"33 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Uncertainty quantification in (p,n) reactions\",\"authors\":\"A. J. Smith, C. Hebborn, F. M. Nunes, R. G. T. Zegers\",\"doi\":\"10.1103/physrevc.110.034602\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Charge-exchange reactions are versatile probes for nuclear structure. In particular, when populating isobaric analog states, these reactions are used to study isovector nuclear densities and neutron skins. The quality of the information extracted from charge-exchange data depends on the accuracy of the reaction models and their inputs; this work addresses these two points. First, we quantify the uncertainties due to effective nucleon-nucleus interactions by propagating the parameter posterior distributions of the recent global optical model KDUQ [C. D. Pruitt, J. E. Escher, and R. Rahman, <span>Phys. Rev. C</span> <b>107</b>, 014602 (2023)] to <math xmlns=\\\"http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML\\\"><mrow><mo>(</mo><mi>p</mi><mo>,</mo><mi>n</mi><mo>)</mo></mrow></math> reaction observables populating the isobaric analog state, at beam energies in the range of 25–160 MeV. Our analysis, focusing on <math xmlns=\\\"http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML\\\"><mmultiscripts><mi>Ca</mi><mprescripts></mprescripts><none></none><mn>48</mn></mmultiscripts></math>, shows that the total parametric uncertainties on the cross sections are around 60–100%. The source of this uncertainty is mainly the transition operator as the uncertainties from the distorted waves alone are less than about 15%. Second, we perform a comparison between two- and three-body models that both describe the dynamics of the reaction within the DWBA. The predictions from these two models are similar and generally agree with the available data, suggesting that one-step DWBA is sufficient to describe the reaction process. Only at a beam energy of 25 MeV are there possible signs that a one-step assumption is not fully correct. This work provides motivation for the quantification of uncertainties associated with the transition operator in three-body model. It also suggests that further constraint of the optical potential parameters is needed for increased model precision.\",\"PeriodicalId\":20122,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Physical Review C\",\"volume\":\"33 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Physical Review C\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"101\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevc.110.034602\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"物理与天体物理\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Physics and Astronomy\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physical Review C","FirstCategoryId":"101","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevc.110.034602","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Physics and Astronomy","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

电荷交换反应是核结构的多功能探针。特别是在填充等压类似态时,这些反应可用于研究等向核密度和中子皮。从电荷交换数据中提取的信息的质量取决于反应模型及其输入的准确性;这项工作涉及这两点。首先,我们通过传播近期全球光学模型 KDUQ [C. D. Pruitt, J. E. Escher, and R. Rahman, Phys. Rev. C 107, 014602 (2023)]的参数后验分布,量化了有效核子-核相互作用引起的不确定性,并在 25-160 兆电子伏特的光束能量范围内,将(p,n)反应观测值填充到等压模拟态。我们以 Ca48 为重点进行的分析表明,横截面的总参数不确定性约为 60-100%。这种不确定性的来源主要是转换算子,因为仅来自扭曲波的不确定性就小于约 15%。其次,我们对描述 DWBA 内反应动力学的二体和三体模型进行了比较。这两种模型的预测结果相似,与现有数据基本吻合,表明一步 DWBA 足以描述反应过程。只有在束流能量为 25 MeV 时,才可能出现单步假设不完全正确的迹象。这项工作为量化与三体模型中转变算子相关的不确定性提供了动力。它还表明,要提高模型的精确度,还需要进一步限制光学势参数。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Uncertainty quantification in (p,n) reactions

Uncertainty quantification in (p,n) reactions
Charge-exchange reactions are versatile probes for nuclear structure. In particular, when populating isobaric analog states, these reactions are used to study isovector nuclear densities and neutron skins. The quality of the information extracted from charge-exchange data depends on the accuracy of the reaction models and their inputs; this work addresses these two points. First, we quantify the uncertainties due to effective nucleon-nucleus interactions by propagating the parameter posterior distributions of the recent global optical model KDUQ [C. D. Pruitt, J. E. Escher, and R. Rahman, Phys. Rev. C 107, 014602 (2023)] to (p,n) reaction observables populating the isobaric analog state, at beam energies in the range of 25–160 MeV. Our analysis, focusing on Ca48, shows that the total parametric uncertainties on the cross sections are around 60–100%. The source of this uncertainty is mainly the transition operator as the uncertainties from the distorted waves alone are less than about 15%. Second, we perform a comparison between two- and three-body models that both describe the dynamics of the reaction within the DWBA. The predictions from these two models are similar and generally agree with the available data, suggesting that one-step DWBA is sufficient to describe the reaction process. Only at a beam energy of 25 MeV are there possible signs that a one-step assumption is not fully correct. This work provides motivation for the quantification of uncertainties associated with the transition operator in three-body model. It also suggests that further constraint of the optical potential parameters is needed for increased model precision.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Physical Review C
Physical Review C 物理-物理:核物理
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
35.50%
发文量
0
审稿时长
1-2 weeks
期刊介绍: Physical Review C (PRC) is a leading journal in theoretical and experimental nuclear physics, publishing more than two-thirds of the research literature in the field. PRC covers experimental and theoretical results in all aspects of nuclear physics, including: Nucleon-nucleon interaction, few-body systems Nuclear structure Nuclear reactions Relativistic nuclear collisions Hadronic physics and QCD Electroweak interaction, symmetries Nuclear astrophysics
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信