我们可以不加压吗?骨水泥加压对股骨颈骨折患者髋关节半关节成形术后死亡率和翻修的影响:一项队列比较研究。

IF 1.6 3区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Muhamed M Farhan-Alanie,Alastair Stephens,Hamza Umar,Ali Ridha,Mateen Arastu,Michael Blankstein
{"title":"我们可以不加压吗?骨水泥加压对股骨颈骨折患者髋关节半关节成形术后死亡率和翻修的影响:一项队列比较研究。","authors":"Muhamed M Farhan-Alanie,Alastair Stephens,Hamza Umar,Ali Ridha,Mateen Arastu,Michael Blankstein","doi":"10.1097/bot.0000000000002914","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVES\r\nThis study aimed to compare 30-day post-operative mortality, and revision for aseptic femoral component loosening and all-causes following hip hemiarthroplasty performed with or without pressurisation of the bone cement in neck of femur fracture patients.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nDesign: Retrospective cohort study.\r\n\r\nSETTING\r\nLevel I trauma center.\r\n\r\nPATIENT SELECTION CRITERIA\r\nPatients ≥60 years with OTA/AO 31B who underwent a cemented hip hemiarthroplasty from 10th December 2007 (database inception) to 15th November 2023 (search date) were reviewed.Outcome Measures and Comparisons: Comparisons were made between patients who underwent hip hemiarthroplasty with versus without pressurisation of the bone cement for outcomes 30-day post-operative mortality, revision for aseptic femoral component loosening, and revision for all-causes.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\n406 procedures among 402 patients, and 722 procedures among 713 patients were performed with and without pressurisation of the bone cement respectively. Mean ages were 83.1 and 84.3 years (p=0.018), with 72.2% and 68.6% (p=0.205) females in the pressurised and non-pressurised cement patient groups respectively. There were no differences in 30-day post-operative mortality (7.2% versus 8.2%; HR 0.89, 95%CI 0.46-1.73, p=0.727). There were no differences in all-cause revision (HR 1.04, 95%CI 0.27-4.04, p=0.953). No revisions were performed for aseptic loosening. Survival at 10 years post-operatively was 15.3% (95%CI 11.46-19.64) and 12.6% (95%CI 7.67-18.82) among patients who underwent hemiarthroplasty with and without bone cement pressurisation respectively.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSIONS\r\nThere were no differences in 30-day post-operative mortality among patients who underwent hemiarthroplasty with, compared to, without bone cement pressurisation. Bone cement pressurisation did not confer any advantages for revision outcomes which may be attributed in part to patients' high mortality rate and low survival beyond 10 years post-operatively.\r\n\r\nLEVEL OF EVIDENCE\r\nLevel III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.","PeriodicalId":16644,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma","volume":"42 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Shall We Not Pressurise It? Effects of Bone Cement Pressurisation on Mortality and Revision Following Hip Hemiarthroplasty for Neck of Femur Fracture Patients: A Comparative Cohort Study.\",\"authors\":\"Muhamed M Farhan-Alanie,Alastair Stephens,Hamza Umar,Ali Ridha,Mateen Arastu,Michael Blankstein\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/bot.0000000000002914\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"OBJECTIVES\\r\\nThis study aimed to compare 30-day post-operative mortality, and revision for aseptic femoral component loosening and all-causes following hip hemiarthroplasty performed with or without pressurisation of the bone cement in neck of femur fracture patients.\\r\\n\\r\\nMETHODS\\r\\nDesign: Retrospective cohort study.\\r\\n\\r\\nSETTING\\r\\nLevel I trauma center.\\r\\n\\r\\nPATIENT SELECTION CRITERIA\\r\\nPatients ≥60 years with OTA/AO 31B who underwent a cemented hip hemiarthroplasty from 10th December 2007 (database inception) to 15th November 2023 (search date) were reviewed.Outcome Measures and Comparisons: Comparisons were made between patients who underwent hip hemiarthroplasty with versus without pressurisation of the bone cement for outcomes 30-day post-operative mortality, revision for aseptic femoral component loosening, and revision for all-causes.\\r\\n\\r\\nRESULTS\\r\\n406 procedures among 402 patients, and 722 procedures among 713 patients were performed with and without pressurisation of the bone cement respectively. Mean ages were 83.1 and 84.3 years (p=0.018), with 72.2% and 68.6% (p=0.205) females in the pressurised and non-pressurised cement patient groups respectively. There were no differences in 30-day post-operative mortality (7.2% versus 8.2%; HR 0.89, 95%CI 0.46-1.73, p=0.727). There were no differences in all-cause revision (HR 1.04, 95%CI 0.27-4.04, p=0.953). No revisions were performed for aseptic loosening. Survival at 10 years post-operatively was 15.3% (95%CI 11.46-19.64) and 12.6% (95%CI 7.67-18.82) among patients who underwent hemiarthroplasty with and without bone cement pressurisation respectively.\\r\\n\\r\\nCONCLUSIONS\\r\\nThere were no differences in 30-day post-operative mortality among patients who underwent hemiarthroplasty with, compared to, without bone cement pressurisation. Bone cement pressurisation did not confer any advantages for revision outcomes which may be attributed in part to patients' high mortality rate and low survival beyond 10 years post-operatively.\\r\\n\\r\\nLEVEL OF EVIDENCE\\r\\nLevel III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.\",\"PeriodicalId\":16644,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma\",\"volume\":\"42 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/bot.0000000000002914\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/bot.0000000000002914","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在比较股骨颈骨折患者在骨水泥加压或不加压的情况下进行髋关节半关节置换术后 30 天的死亡率、无菌性股骨组件松动的翻修率以及各种原因的死亡率:患者选择标准:2007年12月10日(数据库开始日期)至2023年11月15日(搜索日期)期间,年龄≥60岁、患有OTA/AO 31B、接受骨水泥髋关节半置换术的患者:结果402名患者中的406例手术和713名患者中的722例手术分别采用了骨水泥加压和未采用骨水泥加压。加压骨水泥组和非加压骨水泥组患者的平均年龄分别为83.1岁和84.3岁(P=0.018),女性比例分别为72.2%和68.6%(P=0.205)。术后30天死亡率没有差异(7.2%对8.2%;HR 0.89,95%CI 0.46-1.73,p=0.727)。全因翻修率没有差异(HR 1.04,95%CI 0.27-4.04,P=0.953)。没有因无菌性松动而进行翻修。接受和未接受骨水泥加压半关节成形术的患者术后10年的存活率分别为15.3%(95%CI 11.46-19.64)和12.6%(95%CI 7.67-18.82)。骨水泥加压对翻修结果没有任何好处,部分原因可能是患者死亡率高,术后10年后存活率低。有关证据等级的完整描述,请参阅 "作者须知"。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Shall We Not Pressurise It? Effects of Bone Cement Pressurisation on Mortality and Revision Following Hip Hemiarthroplasty for Neck of Femur Fracture Patients: A Comparative Cohort Study.
OBJECTIVES This study aimed to compare 30-day post-operative mortality, and revision for aseptic femoral component loosening and all-causes following hip hemiarthroplasty performed with or without pressurisation of the bone cement in neck of femur fracture patients. METHODS Design: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING Level I trauma center. PATIENT SELECTION CRITERIA Patients ≥60 years with OTA/AO 31B who underwent a cemented hip hemiarthroplasty from 10th December 2007 (database inception) to 15th November 2023 (search date) were reviewed.Outcome Measures and Comparisons: Comparisons were made between patients who underwent hip hemiarthroplasty with versus without pressurisation of the bone cement for outcomes 30-day post-operative mortality, revision for aseptic femoral component loosening, and revision for all-causes. RESULTS 406 procedures among 402 patients, and 722 procedures among 713 patients were performed with and without pressurisation of the bone cement respectively. Mean ages were 83.1 and 84.3 years (p=0.018), with 72.2% and 68.6% (p=0.205) females in the pressurised and non-pressurised cement patient groups respectively. There were no differences in 30-day post-operative mortality (7.2% versus 8.2%; HR 0.89, 95%CI 0.46-1.73, p=0.727). There were no differences in all-cause revision (HR 1.04, 95%CI 0.27-4.04, p=0.953). No revisions were performed for aseptic loosening. Survival at 10 years post-operatively was 15.3% (95%CI 11.46-19.64) and 12.6% (95%CI 7.67-18.82) among patients who underwent hemiarthroplasty with and without bone cement pressurisation respectively. CONCLUSIONS There were no differences in 30-day post-operative mortality among patients who underwent hemiarthroplasty with, compared to, without bone cement pressurisation. Bone cement pressurisation did not confer any advantages for revision outcomes which may be attributed in part to patients' high mortality rate and low survival beyond 10 years post-operatively. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma
Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma 医学-运动科学
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
8.70%
发文量
396
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma is devoted exclusively to the diagnosis and management of hard and soft tissue trauma, including injuries to bone, muscle, ligament, and tendons, as well as spinal cord injuries. Under the guidance of a distinguished international board of editors, the journal provides the most current information on diagnostic techniques, new and improved surgical instruments and procedures, surgical implants and prosthetic devices, bioplastics and biometals; and physical therapy and rehabilitation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信