我应该与你比较吗？评估财政部长

IF 0.5 Q4 PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION

Administration Pub Date : 2024-08-14 DOI:10.2478/admin-2024-0016

Stephen Moore, John Considine

{"title":"我应该与你比较吗？评估财政部长","authors":"Stephen Moore, John Considine","doi":"10.2478/admin-2024-0016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Over the past century, the methods used to evaluate Finance Ministers have evolved from the close scrutiny of individual biographies to the statistical analysis of aggregated data. This paper explores this evolution within the framework of economic theory and applies the results in an Irish context. It concludes that while statistical methods can provide some support for certain hypotheses, they are not yet advanced enough to entirely replace the traditional political economy approach.","PeriodicalId":41890,"journal":{"name":"Administration","volume":"57 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"‘Shall I compare thee?’ Evaluating Finance Ministers\",\"authors\":\"Stephen Moore, John Considine\",\"doi\":\"10.2478/admin-2024-0016\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Over the past century, the methods used to evaluate Finance Ministers have evolved from the close scrutiny of individual biographies to the statistical analysis of aggregated data. This paper explores this evolution within the framework of economic theory and applies the results in an Irish context. It concludes that while statistical methods can provide some support for certain hypotheses, they are not yet advanced enough to entirely replace the traditional political economy approach.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41890,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Administration\",\"volume\":\"57 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Administration\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2478/admin-2024-0016\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Administration","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/admin-2024-0016","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

在过去的一个世纪中，用于评价财政部长的方法已经从仔细研究个人履历发展到对综合数据进行统计分析。本文在经济理论框架内探讨了这一演变，并将结果应用于爱尔兰的情况。本文的结论是，虽然统计方法可以为某些假设提供一些支持，但其先进性还不足以完全取代传统的政治经济学方法。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

‘Shall I compare thee?’ Evaluating Finance Ministers

Over the past century, the methods used to evaluate Finance Ministers have evolved from the close scrutiny of individual biographies to the statistical analysis of aggregated data. This paper explores this evolution within the framework of economic theory and applies the results in an Irish context. It concludes that while statistical methods can provide some support for certain hypotheses, they are not yet advanced enough to entirely replace the traditional political economy approach.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Administration PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION-

CiteScore

0.70

自引率

20.00%

发文量

审稿时长

30 weeks

期刊介绍： Administration is the peer-reviewed journal of the Institute of Public Administration of Ireland. It has been published quarterly since 1953. As the principal journal concerned with Irish public administration and its development, it seeks to combine original scholarship on public administration from a variety of disciplines with the insights and experiences of practitioners. In addition to research articles, which are double blind peer reviewed, the journal welcomes comments on articles, opinion pieces, letters, notices, reports and reviews.