影响太阳耀斑多分类预报模型性能的主要因素分析

IF 1.8 4区 物理与天体物理 Q3 ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS
Changtian Xiang, Yanfang Zheng, Xuebao Li, Jinfang Wei, Pengchao Yan, Yingzhen Si, Xusheng Huang, Liang Dong, Shuainan Yan, Hengrui Lou, Hongwei Ye, Xuefeng Li, Shunhuang Zhang, Yexin Pan, Huiwen Wu
{"title":"影响太阳耀斑多分类预报模型性能的主要因素分析","authors":"Changtian Xiang,&nbsp;Yanfang Zheng,&nbsp;Xuebao Li,&nbsp;Jinfang Wei,&nbsp;Pengchao Yan,&nbsp;Yingzhen Si,&nbsp;Xusheng Huang,&nbsp;Liang Dong,&nbsp;Shuainan Yan,&nbsp;Hengrui Lou,&nbsp;Hongwei Ye,&nbsp;Xuefeng Li,&nbsp;Shunhuang Zhang,&nbsp;Yexin Pan,&nbsp;Huiwen Wu","doi":"10.1007/s10509-024-04356-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Efficient forecasting of solar flares is of significant importance for better risk prevention. Currently, there is relatively rare research on multi/four-classification of flares, and the influence of the number of time steps and data feature dimensions on the prediction performance of multi-class models has not been considered. In this study, we utilize the Space-weather HMI Active Region Patch (SHARP) data to develop two categories of models for multiclass flare prediction within 24 hr, including direct output four-classification models and four-classification models using a cascading scheme. The former encompasses Random Forest (RF) model, Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) model, and Bidirectional LSTM (BLSTM) model, while the latter includes BLSTM Cascade (BLSTM-C) model and BLSTM Cascade with Attention Mechanism (BLSTM-C-A) model. These two categories of models are employed to contrast the impact of different numbers of time steps and the predictive performance in solar flare multi/four-classification. Additionally, we conduct, for the first time, feature importance analysis for multi/four-classification solar flare prediction using deep learning models. The main results are as follows: (1) As the number of time steps increases, the True Skill Statistic (TSS) scores of the four deep learning models improve, showing an overall upward trend in predictive performance. The models achieve their optimal performance when the number of time steps reaches 120. (2) Among the direct output four-class models, deep learning models (LSTM and BLSTM) outperform traditional machine learning model (RF). In both multi-class and binary-class predictions using deep learning, the BLSTM-C model performs better than other deep learning models (LSTM, BLSTM, and BLSTM-C-A). (3) In the feature importance analysis, the top-ranked important features include SAVNCPP and R_VALUE, while the least important features include SHRGT45 and MEANPOT.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8644,"journal":{"name":"Astrophysics and Space Science","volume":"369 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analysis of the main factors affecting the performance of multi-classification forecast model for solar flares\",\"authors\":\"Changtian Xiang,&nbsp;Yanfang Zheng,&nbsp;Xuebao Li,&nbsp;Jinfang Wei,&nbsp;Pengchao Yan,&nbsp;Yingzhen Si,&nbsp;Xusheng Huang,&nbsp;Liang Dong,&nbsp;Shuainan Yan,&nbsp;Hengrui Lou,&nbsp;Hongwei Ye,&nbsp;Xuefeng Li,&nbsp;Shunhuang Zhang,&nbsp;Yexin Pan,&nbsp;Huiwen Wu\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10509-024-04356-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Efficient forecasting of solar flares is of significant importance for better risk prevention. Currently, there is relatively rare research on multi/four-classification of flares, and the influence of the number of time steps and data feature dimensions on the prediction performance of multi-class models has not been considered. In this study, we utilize the Space-weather HMI Active Region Patch (SHARP) data to develop two categories of models for multiclass flare prediction within 24 hr, including direct output four-classification models and four-classification models using a cascading scheme. The former encompasses Random Forest (RF) model, Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) model, and Bidirectional LSTM (BLSTM) model, while the latter includes BLSTM Cascade (BLSTM-C) model and BLSTM Cascade with Attention Mechanism (BLSTM-C-A) model. These two categories of models are employed to contrast the impact of different numbers of time steps and the predictive performance in solar flare multi/four-classification. Additionally, we conduct, for the first time, feature importance analysis for multi/four-classification solar flare prediction using deep learning models. The main results are as follows: (1) As the number of time steps increases, the True Skill Statistic (TSS) scores of the four deep learning models improve, showing an overall upward trend in predictive performance. The models achieve their optimal performance when the number of time steps reaches 120. (2) Among the direct output four-class models, deep learning models (LSTM and BLSTM) outperform traditional machine learning model (RF). In both multi-class and binary-class predictions using deep learning, the BLSTM-C model performs better than other deep learning models (LSTM, BLSTM, and BLSTM-C-A). (3) In the feature importance analysis, the top-ranked important features include SAVNCPP and R_VALUE, while the least important features include SHRGT45 and MEANPOT.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8644,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Astrophysics and Space Science\",\"volume\":\"369 8\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Astrophysics and Space Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"101\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10509-024-04356-w\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"物理与天体物理\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Astrophysics and Space Science","FirstCategoryId":"101","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10509-024-04356-w","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

高效预报太阳耀斑对更好地预防风险具有重要意义。目前,关于耀斑多级/四级分类的研究相对较少,也没有考虑时间步数和数据特征维度对多级模型预测性能的影响。在本研究中,我们利用空间-天气人机界面活动区域斑块(SHARP)数据开发了两类模型,用于 24 小时内多分类耀斑预测,包括直接输出四分类模型和采用级联方案的四分类模型。前者包括随机森林(RF)模型、长短期记忆(LSTM)模型和双向 LSTM(BLSTM)模型,后者包括 BLSTM 级联(BLSTM-C)模型和具有注意机制的 BLSTM 级联(BLSTM-C-A)模型。我们采用这两类模型来对比不同时间步数对太阳耀斑多/四分类预测性能的影响。此外,我们还首次利用深度学习模型对太阳耀斑多/四分类预测进行了特征重要性分析。主要结果如下(1) 随着时间步数的增加,四个深度学习模型的真实技能统计(TSS)得分都有所提高,预测性能总体呈上升趋势。当时间步数达到 120 步时,模型达到最佳性能。(2) 在直接输出的四类模型中,深度学习模型(LSTM 和 BLSTM)优于传统机器学习模型(RF)。在使用深度学习进行多类和二元类预测时,BLSTM-C 模型的表现优于其他深度学习模型(LSTM、BLSTM 和 BLSTM-C-A)。(3) 在特征重要性分析中,排名靠前的重要特征包括 SAVNCPP 和 R_VALUE,而最不重要的特征包括 SHRGT45 和 MEANPOT。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Analysis of the main factors affecting the performance of multi-classification forecast model for solar flares

Analysis of the main factors affecting the performance of multi-classification forecast model for solar flares

Efficient forecasting of solar flares is of significant importance for better risk prevention. Currently, there is relatively rare research on multi/four-classification of flares, and the influence of the number of time steps and data feature dimensions on the prediction performance of multi-class models has not been considered. In this study, we utilize the Space-weather HMI Active Region Patch (SHARP) data to develop two categories of models for multiclass flare prediction within 24 hr, including direct output four-classification models and four-classification models using a cascading scheme. The former encompasses Random Forest (RF) model, Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) model, and Bidirectional LSTM (BLSTM) model, while the latter includes BLSTM Cascade (BLSTM-C) model and BLSTM Cascade with Attention Mechanism (BLSTM-C-A) model. These two categories of models are employed to contrast the impact of different numbers of time steps and the predictive performance in solar flare multi/four-classification. Additionally, we conduct, for the first time, feature importance analysis for multi/four-classification solar flare prediction using deep learning models. The main results are as follows: (1) As the number of time steps increases, the True Skill Statistic (TSS) scores of the four deep learning models improve, showing an overall upward trend in predictive performance. The models achieve their optimal performance when the number of time steps reaches 120. (2) Among the direct output four-class models, deep learning models (LSTM and BLSTM) outperform traditional machine learning model (RF). In both multi-class and binary-class predictions using deep learning, the BLSTM-C model performs better than other deep learning models (LSTM, BLSTM, and BLSTM-C-A). (3) In the feature importance analysis, the top-ranked important features include SAVNCPP and R_VALUE, while the least important features include SHRGT45 and MEANPOT.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Astrophysics and Space Science
Astrophysics and Space Science 地学天文-天文与天体物理
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
5.30%
发文量
106
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Astrophysics and Space Science publishes original contributions and invited reviews covering the entire range of astronomy, astrophysics, astrophysical cosmology, planetary and space science and the astrophysical aspects of astrobiology. This includes both observational and theoretical research, the techniques of astronomical instrumentation and data analysis and astronomical space instrumentation. We particularly welcome papers in the general fields of high-energy astrophysics, astrophysical and astrochemical studies of the interstellar medium including star formation, planetary astrophysics, the formation and evolution of galaxies and the evolution of large scale structure in the Universe. Papers in mathematical physics or in general relativity which do not establish clear astrophysical applications will no longer be considered. The journal also publishes topically selected special issues in research fields of particular scientific interest. These consist of both invited reviews and original research papers. Conference proceedings will not be considered. All papers published in the journal are subject to thorough and strict peer-reviewing. Astrophysics and Space Science features short publication times after acceptance and colour printing free of charge.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信