融合 DIBR 和三参考点理论的概率犹豫模糊多标准群体决策方法

IF 3.6 3区 计算机科学 Q2 AUTOMATION & CONTROL SYSTEMS
Feng Zhu, Yumin Liu, Jingjing Sun, Jichao Xu, Ning Wang
{"title":"融合 DIBR 和三参考点理论的概率犹豫模糊多标准群体决策方法","authors":"Feng Zhu, Yumin Liu, Jingjing Sun, Jichao Xu, Ning Wang","doi":"10.1007/s40815-024-01728-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>As an effective tool to show the fuzziness of qualitative information, the probabilistic hesitant fuzzy set (PHFS) can utilize a group of membership degrees with a clear probability distribution to show the opinions of decision-maker (DM). Given this merit, many probabilistic hesitant fuzzy multi-criteria group decision-making (PHF-MCGDM) methods have been designed. However, most of the existing PHF-MCGDM methods have some limitations, including the difficulty of reflecting DMs’ ambiguous and hesitant preferences for criteria weights and the inability to comprehensively show the impacts of DMs’ irrational behaviors. To address these limitations, this paper develops a novel PHF-MCGDM method that integrates the defining interrelationships between ranked criteria (DIBR) approach and tri-reference point (TRP) theory. First, the PHF-DIBR approach is constructed to determine criteria weights by fully expressing DMs’ ambiguous and hesitant preferences for the importance of criteria. Second, the novel probabilistic hesitant fuzzy correlation coefficient (NPHFCC) is developed for deriving the weights of DMs, which remedies the flaws of the existing correlation coefficients (CC). Moreover, TRP theory is used to describe the psychological behavior effects of DMs and derive the order of alternatives. Finally, the applicability of the proposed method is validated by the case about office flooring material selection, while the sensitivity and comparison analyses are also conducted to further prove its advantages and effectiveness.</p>","PeriodicalId":14056,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Fuzzy Systems","volume":"105 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Probabilistic Hesitant Fuzzy Multi-criteria Group Decision-Making Method Integrated DIBR and Tri-reference Point Theory\",\"authors\":\"Feng Zhu, Yumin Liu, Jingjing Sun, Jichao Xu, Ning Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s40815-024-01728-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>As an effective tool to show the fuzziness of qualitative information, the probabilistic hesitant fuzzy set (PHFS) can utilize a group of membership degrees with a clear probability distribution to show the opinions of decision-maker (DM). Given this merit, many probabilistic hesitant fuzzy multi-criteria group decision-making (PHF-MCGDM) methods have been designed. However, most of the existing PHF-MCGDM methods have some limitations, including the difficulty of reflecting DMs’ ambiguous and hesitant preferences for criteria weights and the inability to comprehensively show the impacts of DMs’ irrational behaviors. To address these limitations, this paper develops a novel PHF-MCGDM method that integrates the defining interrelationships between ranked criteria (DIBR) approach and tri-reference point (TRP) theory. First, the PHF-DIBR approach is constructed to determine criteria weights by fully expressing DMs’ ambiguous and hesitant preferences for the importance of criteria. Second, the novel probabilistic hesitant fuzzy correlation coefficient (NPHFCC) is developed for deriving the weights of DMs, which remedies the flaws of the existing correlation coefficients (CC). Moreover, TRP theory is used to describe the psychological behavior effects of DMs and derive the order of alternatives. Finally, the applicability of the proposed method is validated by the case about office flooring material selection, while the sensitivity and comparison analyses are also conducted to further prove its advantages and effectiveness.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14056,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Fuzzy Systems\",\"volume\":\"105 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Fuzzy Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40815-024-01728-w\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"AUTOMATION & CONTROL SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Fuzzy Systems","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40815-024-01728-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AUTOMATION & CONTROL SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

作为显示定性信息模糊性的有效工具,概率犹豫模糊集(PHFS)可以利用一组具有明确概率分布的成员度来显示决策者(DM)的意见。鉴于这一优点,人们设计了许多概率犹豫模糊多标准群体决策(PHF-MCGDM)方法。然而,现有的 PHF-MCGDM 方法大多存在一些局限性,包括难以反映 DM 对标准权重的模糊和犹豫偏好,以及无法全面展示 DM 非理性行为的影响。针对这些局限性,本文开发了一种新型的 PHF-MCGDM 方法,该方法整合了排序标准间相互关系定义(DIBR)方法和三参考点(TRP)理论。首先,PHF-DIBR 方法通过充分表达 DM 对标准重要性的模糊和犹豫偏好来确定标准权重。其次,开发了用于推导 DM 权重的新型概率犹豫模糊相关系数(NPHFCC),弥补了现有相关系数(CC)的缺陷。此外,还利用 TRP 理论来描述 DM 的心理行为效应,并推导出备选方案的顺序。最后,通过办公室地板材料选择案例验证了所提方法的适用性,并进行了敏感性分析和比较分析,以进一步证明其优势和有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

A Probabilistic Hesitant Fuzzy Multi-criteria Group Decision-Making Method Integrated DIBR and Tri-reference Point Theory

A Probabilistic Hesitant Fuzzy Multi-criteria Group Decision-Making Method Integrated DIBR and Tri-reference Point Theory

As an effective tool to show the fuzziness of qualitative information, the probabilistic hesitant fuzzy set (PHFS) can utilize a group of membership degrees with a clear probability distribution to show the opinions of decision-maker (DM). Given this merit, many probabilistic hesitant fuzzy multi-criteria group decision-making (PHF-MCGDM) methods have been designed. However, most of the existing PHF-MCGDM methods have some limitations, including the difficulty of reflecting DMs’ ambiguous and hesitant preferences for criteria weights and the inability to comprehensively show the impacts of DMs’ irrational behaviors. To address these limitations, this paper develops a novel PHF-MCGDM method that integrates the defining interrelationships between ranked criteria (DIBR) approach and tri-reference point (TRP) theory. First, the PHF-DIBR approach is constructed to determine criteria weights by fully expressing DMs’ ambiguous and hesitant preferences for the importance of criteria. Second, the novel probabilistic hesitant fuzzy correlation coefficient (NPHFCC) is developed for deriving the weights of DMs, which remedies the flaws of the existing correlation coefficients (CC). Moreover, TRP theory is used to describe the psychological behavior effects of DMs and derive the order of alternatives. Finally, the applicability of the proposed method is validated by the case about office flooring material selection, while the sensitivity and comparison analyses are also conducted to further prove its advantages and effectiveness.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Fuzzy Systems
International Journal of Fuzzy Systems 工程技术-计算机:人工智能
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
9.30%
发文量
188
审稿时长
16 months
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Fuzzy Systems (IJFS) is an official journal of Taiwan Fuzzy Systems Association (TFSA) and is published semi-quarterly. IJFS will consider high quality papers that deal with the theory, design, and application of fuzzy systems, soft computing systems, grey systems, and extension theory systems ranging from hardware to software. Survey and expository submissions are also welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信