多布斯裁决后各州堕胎法的输卵管绝育率

JAMA Pub Date : 2024-09-11 DOI:10.1001/jama.2024.16862
Xiao Xu, Ling Chen, Vrunda B. Desai, Cary P. Gross, Craig Evan Pollack, Peter E. Schwartz, Jason D. Wright
{"title":"多布斯裁决后各州堕胎法的输卵管绝育率","authors":"Xiao Xu, Ling Chen, Vrunda B. Desai, Cary P. Gross, Craig Evan Pollack, Peter E. Schwartz, Jason D. Wright","doi":"10.1001/jama.2024.16862","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study examines whether the use of sterilization procedures changed after the <jats:italic>Dobbs</jats:italic> ruling by restrictiveness of state abortion laws.","PeriodicalId":518009,"journal":{"name":"JAMA","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Tubal Sterilization Rates by State Abortion Laws After the Dobbs Decision\",\"authors\":\"Xiao Xu, Ling Chen, Vrunda B. Desai, Cary P. Gross, Craig Evan Pollack, Peter E. Schwartz, Jason D. Wright\",\"doi\":\"10.1001/jama.2024.16862\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study examines whether the use of sterilization procedures changed after the <jats:italic>Dobbs</jats:italic> ruling by restrictiveness of state abortion laws.\",\"PeriodicalId\":518009,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JAMA\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JAMA\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2024.16862\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2024.16862","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究探讨了多布斯案裁决后,各州堕胎法的限制性是否改变了绝育手术的使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Tubal Sterilization Rates by State Abortion Laws After the Dobbs Decision
This study examines whether the use of sterilization procedures changed after the Dobbs ruling by restrictiveness of state abortion laws.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信