阿根廷有偿家政工作中持续存在的非正规性

IF 2.8 4区管理学 Q1 ECONOMICS

International Labour Review Pub Date : 2024-09-11 DOI:10.1111/ilr.12435

Francisca PEREYRA, Lorena POBLETE

{"title":"阿根廷有偿家政工作中持续存在的非正规性","authors":"Francisca PEREYRA, Lorena POBLETE","doi":"10.1111/ilr.12435","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Informality is a historical feature of paid domestic labour in Latin America. The case of Argentina is of particular interest, as it showcases a substantial reform of the regulatory framework in combination with innovative mechanisms for its implementation. Using mixed-methods analysis, this article examines some of the reasons that may explain the apparent stagnation in the rate of formalization in recent years (at around 25 per cent) and the persistent arbitrariness with which labour rights that are theoretically guaranteed by formality are granted in practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":47216,"journal":{"name":"International Labour Review","volume":"163 3","pages":"435-454"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The persistence of informality in paid domestic work in Argentina\",\"authors\":\"Francisca PEREYRA, Lorena POBLETE\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ilr.12435\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Informality is a historical feature of paid domestic labour in Latin America. The case of Argentina is of particular interest, as it showcases a substantial reform of the regulatory framework in combination with innovative mechanisms for its implementation. Using mixed-methods analysis, this article examines some of the reasons that may explain the apparent stagnation in the rate of formalization in recent years (at around 25 per cent) and the persistent arbitrariness with which labour rights that are theoretically guaranteed by formality are granted in practice.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47216,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Labour Review\",\"volume\":\"163 3\",\"pages\":\"435-454\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Labour Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ilr.12435\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Labour Review","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ilr.12435","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

非正规性是拉丁美洲有偿家政劳动的一个历史特征。阿根廷的案例尤其引人关注，因为它展示了监管框架的实质性改革以及创新的实施机制。本文采用混合方法分析，探讨了近年来正规化率明显停滞不前（约为 25%）的一些原因，以及理论上由正规化保障的劳动权利在实践中长期存在的随意性。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

The persistence of informality in paid domestic work in Argentina

Informality is a historical feature of paid domestic labour in Latin America. The case of Argentina is of particular interest, as it showcases a substantial reform of the regulatory framework in combination with innovative mechanisms for its implementation. Using mixed-methods analysis, this article examines some of the reasons that may explain the apparent stagnation in the rate of formalization in recent years (at around 25 per cent) and the persistent arbitrariness with which labour rights that are theoretically guaranteed by formality are granted in practice.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

International Labour Review Multiple-

CiteScore

4.30

自引率

20.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： The International Labour Review is the world"s leading multidisciplinary journal of labour market institutions and economics. Its aim is to advance academic research and inform policy debate and decision-making in these fields by bringing together the original thinking of lawyers, economists, sociologists, political scientists and industrial relations specialists on a broad range of labour market policy and social protection concerns. The International Labour Review also features concise reports on current developments considered to be of particular interest to those working in these fields and reviews of recent major publications. It is committed to an editorial policy that combines accessibility with rigorous, insightful analysis and the highest scholarly standards.