Lisa Türp, Frank Lehmann, Sebastian Wille, Matthias Kern
{"title":"切割不同类型氧化锆时，不同切割工具和转速对发热量和切割效率的影响","authors":"Lisa Türp, Frank Lehmann, Sebastian Wille, Matthias Kern","doi":"10.1016/j.jmbbm.2024.106715","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>The purpose of this study was to evaluate the temperature generated on the intaglio surface and efficiency when cutting different types of zirconia with different rotary instruments and rotational speeds.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A conventional diamond rotary instrument (Brasseler, grit size 107 μm) and special diamond rotary instrument marketed to cut zirconia (4 ZR, Brasseler, grit size 126 μm) were tested on 3Y-TZP and 4Y-TZP zirconia with a rotation speed of 100,000 rpm and 200,000 rpm. Zirconia specimens were cut under water cooling (110 mL/min) in a custom-made holder attached to a universal testing machine. The temperature was recorded with infrared sensors pointing at the intaglio surface of the zirconia specimens.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A rotation speed of 200,000 rpm resulted in significantly shorter cutting times, but also in significantly higher temperatures at the intaglio surface of the zirconia specimens compared with a rotation speed of 100,000 rpm. Significantly shorter cutting times were observed for the conventional diamond rotary instrument than for the special rotary instrument marketed to cut zirconia. Using the special rotary instrument, significantly longer cutting times were recorded for 3Y-TZP than for 4Y-TZP.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>A conventional diamond rotary instrument was more efficient than a special rotary instrument. However, to avoid high temperatures when cutting zirconia clinically, a rotation speed of 100,000 rpm is recommended.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":380,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials","volume":"160 ","pages":"Article 106715"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1751616124003473/pdfft?md5=78e1619198ee9525b027fbaf138a077f&pid=1-s2.0-S1751616124003473-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Influence of different cutting instruments and rotational speeds on heat generation and cutting efficiency when sectioning different types of zirconia\",\"authors\":\"Lisa Türp, Frank Lehmann, Sebastian Wille, Matthias Kern\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jmbbm.2024.106715\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>The purpose of this study was to evaluate the temperature generated on the intaglio surface and efficiency when cutting different types of zirconia with different rotary instruments and rotational speeds.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A conventional diamond rotary instrument (Brasseler, grit size 107 μm) and special diamond rotary instrument marketed to cut zirconia (4 ZR, Brasseler, grit size 126 μm) were tested on 3Y-TZP and 4Y-TZP zirconia with a rotation speed of 100,000 rpm and 200,000 rpm. Zirconia specimens were cut under water cooling (110 mL/min) in a custom-made holder attached to a universal testing machine. The temperature was recorded with infrared sensors pointing at the intaglio surface of the zirconia specimens.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A rotation speed of 200,000 rpm resulted in significantly shorter cutting times, but also in significantly higher temperatures at the intaglio surface of the zirconia specimens compared with a rotation speed of 100,000 rpm. Significantly shorter cutting times were observed for the conventional diamond rotary instrument than for the special rotary instrument marketed to cut zirconia. Using the special rotary instrument, significantly longer cutting times were recorded for 3Y-TZP than for 4Y-TZP.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>A conventional diamond rotary instrument was more efficient than a special rotary instrument. However, to avoid high temperatures when cutting zirconia clinically, a rotation speed of 100,000 rpm is recommended.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":380,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials\",\"volume\":\"160 \",\"pages\":\"Article 106715\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1751616124003473/pdfft?md5=78e1619198ee9525b027fbaf138a077f&pid=1-s2.0-S1751616124003473-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1751616124003473\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1751616124003473","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Influence of different cutting instruments and rotational speeds on heat generation and cutting efficiency when sectioning different types of zirconia
Purpose
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the temperature generated on the intaglio surface and efficiency when cutting different types of zirconia with different rotary instruments and rotational speeds.
Methods
A conventional diamond rotary instrument (Brasseler, grit size 107 μm) and special diamond rotary instrument marketed to cut zirconia (4 ZR, Brasseler, grit size 126 μm) were tested on 3Y-TZP and 4Y-TZP zirconia with a rotation speed of 100,000 rpm and 200,000 rpm. Zirconia specimens were cut under water cooling (110 mL/min) in a custom-made holder attached to a universal testing machine. The temperature was recorded with infrared sensors pointing at the intaglio surface of the zirconia specimens.
Results
A rotation speed of 200,000 rpm resulted in significantly shorter cutting times, but also in significantly higher temperatures at the intaglio surface of the zirconia specimens compared with a rotation speed of 100,000 rpm. Significantly shorter cutting times were observed for the conventional diamond rotary instrument than for the special rotary instrument marketed to cut zirconia. Using the special rotary instrument, significantly longer cutting times were recorded for 3Y-TZP than for 4Y-TZP.
Conclusions
A conventional diamond rotary instrument was more efficient than a special rotary instrument. However, to avoid high temperatures when cutting zirconia clinically, a rotation speed of 100,000 rpm is recommended.
期刊介绍：
The Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials is concerned with the mechanical deformation, damage and failure under applied forces, of biological material (at the tissue, cellular and molecular levels) and of biomaterials, i.e. those materials which are designed to mimic or replace biological materials.
The primary focus of the journal is the synthesis of materials science, biology, and medical and dental science. Reports of fundamental scientific investigations are welcome, as are articles concerned with the practical application of materials in medical devices. Both experimental and theoretical work is of interest; theoretical papers will normally include comparison of predictions with experimental data, though we recognize that this may not always be appropriate. The journal also publishes technical notes concerned with emerging experimental or theoretical techniques, letters to the editor and, by invitation, review articles and papers describing existing techniques for the benefit of an interdisciplinary readership.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
