基于指数的作物保险在稳定加纳北部小农毛利率方面的潜力

IF 6.1 1区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Opeyemi Obafemi Adelesi , Yean-Uk Kim , Johannes Schuler , Peter Zander , Michael Murithi Njoroge , Lilian Waithaka , Alhassan Lansah Abdulai , Dilys Sefakor MacCarthy , Heidi Webber
{"title":"基于指数的作物保险在稳定加纳北部小农毛利率方面的潜力","authors":"Opeyemi Obafemi Adelesi ,&nbsp;Yean-Uk Kim ,&nbsp;Johannes Schuler ,&nbsp;Peter Zander ,&nbsp;Michael Murithi Njoroge ,&nbsp;Lilian Waithaka ,&nbsp;Alhassan Lansah Abdulai ,&nbsp;Dilys Sefakor MacCarthy ,&nbsp;Heidi Webber","doi":"10.1016/j.agsy.2024.104130","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Context</h3><p>Smallholder farmers in semi-arid West Africa face challenges such as weather variability, soil infertility, and inadequate market infrastructure, hindering their adoption of improved farming practices. Economic risks associated with uncertain weather, production and market conditions often result in measures such as selling assets and withdrawing children from school, resulting in long-term impoverishment. To break these poverty traps, there is a need for affordable and sustainable risk management approaches at the farm level. Proposed strategies include risk reduction through stress-resistant crop varieties and diversification, additional investments transfer options like crop insurance and contract farming. Despite experimentation with insurance products in sub-Saharan Africa, low adoption persists due to many factors including high premiums, imperfect indices, and cognitive factors.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>The objective of this study is to assess the probability of two different index-based insurance products to stabilize smallholder farmers' income and limit asset losses in Northern Ghana using an integrated bio-economic modelling approach.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>We adapted an existing integrated bio-economic model comprising a process-based crop model, farm simulation model, and annual optimization model by including insurance contracts to assess their impacts on farmers' income and assets. We collaborated with an insurance service provider in sub–Saharan Africa to design and compare two weather index-based insurance contracts—one covering seeding costs and another addressing full input costs. Additionally, we considered the impact of management adaptations, such as replanting after crop establishment failure.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The result from the study suggests that except for the most resource constrained, farmers would be better off purchasing seed insurance and replanting in the event of weather shocks, stabilizing their incomes and reducing the sale of their assets. These insurance options are less expensive than full weather index insurance for the resource-constrained farmers considering that extreme weather conditions do not occur regularly.</p></div><div><h3>Significance</h3><p>This study is significant for smallholder farmers in semi-arid West Africa, who are faced with economic and environmental challenges, challenging efforts to improve livelihoods. Focusing on Northern Ghana, the research assesses the viability of two index-based insurance products using an integrated bio-economic modelling approach. By presenting the probability of outcomes for income and farm assets, particularly through seed insurance incentivizing replanting after extreme weather shocks, the study offers a cost-effective solution for resource-constrained farmers. The results suggest the potential for weather-index insurance contracts to help smallholder farmers avoid bankruptcy or fall into poverty traps, especially after shock years.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7730,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural Systems","volume":"221 ","pages":"Article 104130"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308521X24002804/pdfft?md5=248527fe3051ed49b41eae0ba4a2475f&pid=1-s2.0-S0308521X24002804-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The potential for index-based crop insurance to stabilize smallholder farmers' gross margins in Northern Ghana\",\"authors\":\"Opeyemi Obafemi Adelesi ,&nbsp;Yean-Uk Kim ,&nbsp;Johannes Schuler ,&nbsp;Peter Zander ,&nbsp;Michael Murithi Njoroge ,&nbsp;Lilian Waithaka ,&nbsp;Alhassan Lansah Abdulai ,&nbsp;Dilys Sefakor MacCarthy ,&nbsp;Heidi Webber\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.agsy.2024.104130\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Context</h3><p>Smallholder farmers in semi-arid West Africa face challenges such as weather variability, soil infertility, and inadequate market infrastructure, hindering their adoption of improved farming practices. Economic risks associated with uncertain weather, production and market conditions often result in measures such as selling assets and withdrawing children from school, resulting in long-term impoverishment. To break these poverty traps, there is a need for affordable and sustainable risk management approaches at the farm level. Proposed strategies include risk reduction through stress-resistant crop varieties and diversification, additional investments transfer options like crop insurance and contract farming. Despite experimentation with insurance products in sub-Saharan Africa, low adoption persists due to many factors including high premiums, imperfect indices, and cognitive factors.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>The objective of this study is to assess the probability of two different index-based insurance products to stabilize smallholder farmers' income and limit asset losses in Northern Ghana using an integrated bio-economic modelling approach.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>We adapted an existing integrated bio-economic model comprising a process-based crop model, farm simulation model, and annual optimization model by including insurance contracts to assess their impacts on farmers' income and assets. We collaborated with an insurance service provider in sub–Saharan Africa to design and compare two weather index-based insurance contracts—one covering seeding costs and another addressing full input costs. Additionally, we considered the impact of management adaptations, such as replanting after crop establishment failure.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The result from the study suggests that except for the most resource constrained, farmers would be better off purchasing seed insurance and replanting in the event of weather shocks, stabilizing their incomes and reducing the sale of their assets. These insurance options are less expensive than full weather index insurance for the resource-constrained farmers considering that extreme weather conditions do not occur regularly.</p></div><div><h3>Significance</h3><p>This study is significant for smallholder farmers in semi-arid West Africa, who are faced with economic and environmental challenges, challenging efforts to improve livelihoods. Focusing on Northern Ghana, the research assesses the viability of two index-based insurance products using an integrated bio-economic modelling approach. By presenting the probability of outcomes for income and farm assets, particularly through seed insurance incentivizing replanting after extreme weather shocks, the study offers a cost-effective solution for resource-constrained farmers. The results suggest the potential for weather-index insurance contracts to help smallholder farmers avoid bankruptcy or fall into poverty traps, especially after shock years.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7730,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Agricultural Systems\",\"volume\":\"221 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104130\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308521X24002804/pdfft?md5=248527fe3051ed49b41eae0ba4a2475f&pid=1-s2.0-S0308521X24002804-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Agricultural Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308521X24002804\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agricultural Systems","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308521X24002804","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景西非半干旱地区的小农面临着天气多变、土壤贫瘠和市场基础设施不足等挑战,阻碍了他们采用改良耕作方法。与不确定的天气、生产和市场条件相关的经济风险往往导致出售资产和子女退学等措施,造成长期贫困。为了打破这些贫困陷阱,需要在农场一级采取负担得起的、可持续的风险管理方法。拟议的战略包括通过抗逆作物品种和多样化来降低风险,以及作物保险和订单农业等额外投资转移方案。尽管撒哈拉以南非洲地区对保险产品进行了尝试,但由于保费高昂、指数不完善和认知因素等诸多因素,保险产品的采用率一直很低。方法我们对现有的综合生物经济模型(包括基于过程的作物模型、农场模拟模型和年度优化模型)进行了调整,将保险合同纳入其中,以评估其对农民收入和资产的影响。我们与撒哈拉以南非洲的一家保险服务提供商合作,设计并比较了两份基于天气指数的保险合同,一份涉及播种成本,另一份涉及全部投入成本。此外,我们还考虑了管理适应措施的影响,如作物歉收后重新播种。研究结果表明,除了资源最紧张的农户外,其他农户最好购买种子保险,并在遇到天气冲击时重新播种,以稳定收入并减少资产出售。考虑到极端天气情况并不经常发生,对于资源有限的农民来说,这些保险方案比全面天气指数保险的成本更低。 研究意义 本研究对西非半干旱地区的小农意义重大,他们面临着经济和环境挑战,改善生计的努力面临挑战。研究以加纳北部为重点,采用综合生物经济建模方法评估了两种基于指数的保险产品的可行性。通过介绍收入和农业资产的结果概率,特别是通过种子保险激励极端天气冲击后的重新种植,该研究为资源有限的农民提供了一个具有成本效益的解决方案。研究结果表明,天气指数保险合同具有帮助小农避免破产或陷入贫困陷阱的潜力,尤其是在冲击年之后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

The potential for index-based crop insurance to stabilize smallholder farmers' gross margins in Northern Ghana

The potential for index-based crop insurance to stabilize smallholder farmers' gross margins in Northern Ghana

Context

Smallholder farmers in semi-arid West Africa face challenges such as weather variability, soil infertility, and inadequate market infrastructure, hindering their adoption of improved farming practices. Economic risks associated with uncertain weather, production and market conditions often result in measures such as selling assets and withdrawing children from school, resulting in long-term impoverishment. To break these poverty traps, there is a need for affordable and sustainable risk management approaches at the farm level. Proposed strategies include risk reduction through stress-resistant crop varieties and diversification, additional investments transfer options like crop insurance and contract farming. Despite experimentation with insurance products in sub-Saharan Africa, low adoption persists due to many factors including high premiums, imperfect indices, and cognitive factors.

Objective

The objective of this study is to assess the probability of two different index-based insurance products to stabilize smallholder farmers' income and limit asset losses in Northern Ghana using an integrated bio-economic modelling approach.

Method

We adapted an existing integrated bio-economic model comprising a process-based crop model, farm simulation model, and annual optimization model by including insurance contracts to assess their impacts on farmers' income and assets. We collaborated with an insurance service provider in sub–Saharan Africa to design and compare two weather index-based insurance contracts—one covering seeding costs and another addressing full input costs. Additionally, we considered the impact of management adaptations, such as replanting after crop establishment failure.

Results

The result from the study suggests that except for the most resource constrained, farmers would be better off purchasing seed insurance and replanting in the event of weather shocks, stabilizing their incomes and reducing the sale of their assets. These insurance options are less expensive than full weather index insurance for the resource-constrained farmers considering that extreme weather conditions do not occur regularly.

Significance

This study is significant for smallholder farmers in semi-arid West Africa, who are faced with economic and environmental challenges, challenging efforts to improve livelihoods. Focusing on Northern Ghana, the research assesses the viability of two index-based insurance products using an integrated bio-economic modelling approach. By presenting the probability of outcomes for income and farm assets, particularly through seed insurance incentivizing replanting after extreme weather shocks, the study offers a cost-effective solution for resource-constrained farmers. The results suggest the potential for weather-index insurance contracts to help smallholder farmers avoid bankruptcy or fall into poverty traps, especially after shock years.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Agricultural Systems
Agricultural Systems 农林科学-农业综合
CiteScore
13.30
自引率
7.60%
发文量
174
审稿时长
30 days
期刊介绍: Agricultural Systems is an international journal that deals with interactions - among the components of agricultural systems, among hierarchical levels of agricultural systems, between agricultural and other land use systems, and between agricultural systems and their natural, social and economic environments. The scope includes the development and application of systems analysis methodologies in the following areas: Systems approaches in the sustainable intensification of agriculture; pathways for sustainable intensification; crop-livestock integration; farm-level resource allocation; quantification of benefits and trade-offs at farm to landscape levels; integrative, participatory and dynamic modelling approaches for qualitative and quantitative assessments of agricultural systems and decision making; The interactions between agricultural and non-agricultural landscapes; the multiple services of agricultural systems; food security and the environment; Global change and adaptation science; transformational adaptations as driven by changes in climate, policy, values and attitudes influencing the design of farming systems; Development and application of farming systems design tools and methods for impact, scenario and case study analysis; managing the complexities of dynamic agricultural systems; innovation systems and multi stakeholder arrangements that support or promote change and (or) inform policy decisions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信